Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen likely to cooperate as his attorneys leave case, sources say

So they raided a lawyers office and got documents ...lets see ..lawyers represent good ,bad , innocent and guilty clients . The system is such that a good defense lawyer can win for his guilty client in a court case . It happens every day . Some cases are dismissed just on technicalities . There are also statue of limits as to time they can go back . Would it not be a hoot if this lawyer stiffed Trump years ago and this is to get back at him . If so then Silly and Trump can laugh together at the lawyer .

a reply to: Sillyolme

For you

Rudy: Cohen wont be flipping on anyone

There you go, an actual named, on record source with inside knowledge of the whole affair telling it how it is.

Glad I could help

P.s didnt realise this whole thing started with CNN, if I had of known that I wouldnt have bothered responding or taking this thread even slightly seriously

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
a reply to: Sillyolme

For you

Rudy: Cohen wont be flipping on anyone

There you go, an actual named, on record source with inside knowledge of the whole affair telling it how it is.

Glad I could help

P.s didnt realise this whole thing started with CNN, if I had of known that I wouldnt have bothered responding or taking this thread even slightly seriously

It's non-stop disappointment for them. Every time they think "we've got him" it turns out to be false. You'd think they'd learn they're being strung along by now.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
How much info do you think Cohen has?
How many shady deals?
How many payoffs?
How many women?
How awful.Tee hee.

so your concern is how many women Trump #ed?

For clarification, where is the line at? 4 porn stars and 2 playboy models, or is the bar set a bit lower?

Shallow doesn't begin to describe your position here.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
a reply to: Sillyolme

For you

Rudy: Cohen wont be flipping on anyone

There you go, an actual named, on record source with inside knowledge of the whole affair telling it how it is.

Glad I could help

P.s didnt realise this whole thing started with CNN, if I had of known that I wouldnt have bothered responding or taking this thread even slightly seriously

It's non-stop disappointment for them. Every time they think "we've got him" it turns out to be false. You'd think they'd learn they're being strung along by now.

I know, but you gotta give em credit for their enthusiasm and ability to get right back up after reality or logic knock em down.
Its almost endearing in a weird way but then again us Aussies have a soft spot for those fighting unwinnable battles, even if those battles are against common sense

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
a reply to: Sillyolme

For you

Rudy: Cohen wont be flipping on anyone

There you go, an actual named, on record source with inside knowledge of the whole affair telling it how it is.

Glad I could help

P.s didnt realise this whole thing started with CNN, if I had of known that I wouldnt have bothered responding or taking this thread even slightly seriously

It's non-stop disappointment for them. Every time they think "we've got him" it turns out to be false. You'd think they'd learn they're being strung along by now.

I know, but you gotta give em credit for their enthusiasm and ability to get right back up after reality or logic knock em down.
Its almost endearing in a weird way but then again us Aussies have a soft spot for those fighting unwinnable battles, even if those battles are against common sense

It's basically a cult mentality/religion to them at this point. It gives their life meaning, so they can't let it go.

Bless your fight, Silly! Triggering the Red Caps so early in the day, you always have a way to make just enough common sense get through to them that it makes them enraged on a personal level. We should go easy though, it's been a tough day so far already:

www.independent.co.uk...

www.cnn.com...

www.buzzfeed.com...

www.commondreams.org...

originally posted by: crtrvt
Bless your fight, Silly! Triggering the Red Caps so early in the day, you always have a way to make just enough common sense get through to them that it makes them enraged on a personal level. We should go easy though, it's been a tough day so far already:

www.independent.co.uk...

www.cnn.com...

www.buzzfeed.com...

www.commondreams.org...

This is funny considering everything she said was debunked. If that's your idea of "common sense", please tell me you don't drive or operate any kind of machinery.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: crtrvt
Bless your fight, Silly! Triggering the Red Caps so early in the day, you always have a way to make just enough common sense get through to them that it makes them enraged on a personal level. We should go easy though, it's been a tough day so far already:

www.independent.co.uk...

www.cnn.com...

www.buzzfeed.com...

www.commondreams.org...

This is funny considering everything she said was debunked. If that's your idea of "common sense", please tell me you don't drive or operate any kind of machinery.

Oooh! Good one!

a reply to: crtrvt

it makes them enraged on a personal level.

I know. I do it on purpose.


New in the news right now.

www.reuters.com...

The Attorney General of the State Of New York is suing the Trump Foundation for decades of illegal activities.
The hits just keep on coming.

a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

They know words like "he's shaking in his boots."

a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

I wouldn't be happy but I'd sure as hell wouldn't be worried. What they would find out is something my husband could tell them. That I spend thousands of dollars on cosmetics, clothes and shoes in a year.
That I like Chinese restaurants. That we live a little to close to the casinos in Delaware and New Jersey. Lol.
Yeah I have vices. But they're not anything I'm ashamed of.

But why do you keep trying to make this about me?
It's about Donald Trump! Not me.

a reply to: the2ofusr1

This particular lawyer had one client.
well two others.. One he answered a legal question for and one he paid off a woman for. ( a different woman)
Everything else is you know who...
But it doesn't look like too much was actually considered "lawyer stuff" since the special master is letting it in as evidence.
He is most likely going to be indicted very soon. Then I guess we'll see what tune he whistles.

a reply to: the2ofusr1

P.S.

Would it not be a hoot if this lawyer stiffed Trump years ago

Do you not know who Michael Cohen is?
It doesn't sound like it.

a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

Yeah Rudy...
The one who told us trump "funneled" money through his LLC to pay off Stormy Daniels.
That Rudy?

The one who told us that the first lady believes her husband about Stormy Daniels and then the first ladies aide says she's never shared her feelings about anything with him.
That Rudy?

a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

It didn't come from CNN. It came from NBC. My source was politico I believe.

a reply to: face23785

We got him. It's just a question of how many ways now. Lol.

Tomorrow the sifting of the seized material will be completed.
Most is going through.

a reply to: Sillyolme


Did you just bump your own thread 7 times in a row??

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA Classic!!!!

Happy Birthday Mr. President!!



Edit for recount.....9 times in a row!!!! LMFAO Your desperation reeks!!!

a reply to: GuidedKill

Didn't you say you were out?
Can't resist me huh?