It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama dismisses Pyongyang’s bid to halt nuclear tests

page: 3
21
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus




He “blew it off” because NK set off a hydrogen bomb just 3 months before. 

Quite clearly they had, at the time, no interest in de-nuclearising. 


Well it was only a few months ago that NK were firing missiles over Japan but look what has happened this week.

Lame excuses.





Let’s not forget the bill HR 757 that was introduced not long afterwards that was voted 408-2 in favour of those new sanctions on NK...that’s pretty much every democrat and republican in favour of it. 

The majority of the co-sponsors were Republicans too, 23 of 36 to be exact. 


You mean neocons and neolibs? This is my shocked face:





But hey, you just keep on going with your partisan hate fest. 

 


Partisan hatred? I'm central left at heart but the modern left do not represent my beliefs, at all.

Far from it in fact. All I see in the left wing governments right now is brewing fascism flavoured with a deep conspiracy to destroy the traditional values of the human race. 👀🚬




posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Comparing a missile to a nuclear test is what’s lame.

Se how you’re coming up with excuse after excuse?

That’s the partisan bs I’m talking about, it’s playing right into the OP’s hand.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

And Obama has the IQ of a piss-ant, so I'm not too concerned with his dismissal of anything.

I trust & prefer every dictator, criminal, drug lord and tyrant more-so than Obama & his co-conspirators. At least with Kim/Putin/et al, you know what you're dealing with - unlike these fake liberal usurpers who hide behind decency/norms but are nothing but decent or normal.

Obama = total, unabashed failure as a human being as a President.
edit on 6/14/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   
I’ve got the perfect response.

Obama is better than you.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 10:26 AM
link   
Its all stoogery. Enjoy.



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 11:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: M5xaz

The Democrats supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again

Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.

Educate yourself, or sober up, Bacchus.

Leftists are nothing if not experts at projecting their failings on others, in all topics, diplomacy as well as things as depraved as sexual abuse and deviancy.






Are you really arguing it's the democrats fault NK is now a nuclear power....?


How stupid must you be to supply nuclear reactors to a country known to be pursing at the time ( and now having) nuclear weapons ?



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz
It is the LEFT, Democrats, who supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again


Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.



You lie a lot.



Clinton did negotiate a deal in 1994 to provide two nuclear reactors and provide heavy fuel oil to North Korea in exchange for the country giving up its nuclear weapons program.

That's about where the truth of this image stops. The energy aid costs didn’t approach anywhere near $5 billion, and the reactors were never built.


www.politifact.com...
edit on 14-6-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 14 2018 @ 05:37 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

He didn't pay them, THEIR money was unfrozen and what it got us were inspections.

Now that trump ended the deal irans money stays unfrozen and we get no inspections.

Obama is the reason they got their money back.

Trump is the reason there are no inspections.



posted on Jun, 15 2018 @ 01:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: M5xaz

The Democrats supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again

Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.

Educate yourself, or sober up, Bacchus.

Leftists are nothing if not experts at projecting their failings on others, in all topics, diplomacy as well as things as depraved as sexual abuse and deviancy.






Are you really arguing it's the democrats fault NK is now a nuclear power....?


How stupid must you be to supply nuclear reactors to a country known to be pursing at the time ( and now having) nuclear weapons ?






It's very simple really, both sides of government as in the left and the right both work to the same goals, part of these goals is to grow government at the expense of the people, we are peons to them nothing more nothing less, nth Korea was given access for financial reasons, essentially people lining their pockets....



posted on Jun, 15 2018 @ 11:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
I’ve got the perfect response.

Obama is better than you.


The Obama Culture agrees !!

100% in fact.

😃🚬🔫



posted on Jun, 15 2018 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: M5xaz

The Democrats supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again

Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.

Educate yourself, or sober up, Bacchus.

Leftists are nothing if not experts at projecting their failings on others, in all topics, diplomacy as well as things as depraved as sexual abuse and deviancy.






Are you really arguing it's the democrats fault NK is now a nuclear power....?


How stupid must you be to supply nuclear reactors to a country known to be pursing at the time ( and now having) nuclear weapons ?


How stupid you must be to think people will believe your BS.

NEVER HAPPENED.



posted on Jun, 15 2018 @ 04:05 PM
link   
Amongst all of this irrational exuberance and propaganda-driven partisan finger-pointing, I fear that we are ignoring the sage advice of Ronald Reagan, "Trust, but verify" and embracing Neville Chamberlain's "Peace for our time."

Any student of history can see that we are making the same mistakes of the past. The difference this time is that we are dealing with enough thermonuclear weapons to end the world as we know it in very short order.

-dex



posted on Jun, 16 2018 @ 08:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: M5xaz

The Democrats supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again

Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.

Educate yourself, or sober up, Bacchus.

Leftists are nothing if not experts at projecting their failings on others, in all topics, diplomacy as well as things as depraved as sexual abuse and deviancy.






Are you really arguing it's the democrats fault NK is now a nuclear power....?


How stupid must you be to supply nuclear reactors to a country known to be pursing at the time ( and now having) nuclear weapons ?


How stupid you must be to think people will believe your BS.

NEVER HAPPENED.


While their construction started and remains unfinished, William " Bill the Zipper" Clinton did sign up to supply two nuclear reactors to North Korea.

Did happen.

Deny ignorance



posted on Jun, 16 2018 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: M5xaz

The Democrats supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again

Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.

Educate yourself, or sober up, Bacchus.

Leftists are nothing if not experts at projecting their failings on others, in all topics, diplomacy as well as things as depraved as sexual abuse and deviancy.






Are you really arguing it's the democrats fault NK is now a nuclear power....?


How stupid must you be to supply nuclear reactors to a country known to be pursing at the time ( and now having) nuclear weapons ?


How stupid you must be to think people will believe your BS.

NEVER HAPPENED.


While their construction started and remains unfinished, William " Bill the Zipper" Clinton did sign up to supply two nuclear reactors to North Korea.

Did happen.

Deny ignorance


That's not the lie you told though.

The INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY agreed to help North Korea with Nuclear Power IF they met their agreed upon inspections and disarmament. NK failed, the west never gave them reactors etc.

You lied.


originally posted by: M5xaz


It is the LEFT, Democrats, who supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again




posted on Jun, 16 2018 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: M5xaz

The Democrats supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again

Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.

Educate yourself, or sober up, Bacchus.

Leftists are nothing if not experts at projecting their failings on others, in all topics, diplomacy as well as things as depraved as sexual abuse and deviancy.






Are you really arguing it's the democrats fault NK is now a nuclear power....?


How stupid must you be to supply nuclear reactors to a country known to be pursing at the time ( and now having) nuclear weapons ?


How stupid you must be to think people will believe your BS.

NEVER HAPPENED.


While their construction started and remains unfinished, William " Bill the Zipper" Clinton did sign up to supply two nuclear reactors to North Korea.

Did happen.

Deny ignorance


That's not the lie you told though.

The INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY agreed to help North Korea with Nuclear Power IF they met their agreed upon inspections and disarmament. NK failed, the west never gave them reactors etc.

You lied.


originally posted by: M5xaz


It is the LEFT, Democrats, who supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again



Sorry Honey.
Wrong again and uninformed, as usual

en.wikipedia.org...
"...two light water reactors would be constructed in North Korea by 2003 at a cost of $4 billion..."

"Although the agreement had largely broken down, North Korea did not restart work on the two production size nuclear power plants that were frozen under the agreement. These plants could potentially have produced enough weapons-grade plutonium to produce several nuclear weapons per year."

Providing TWO nuclear plants that could produce A-Bombs is an idiotic idea.

I did not lie.

Not like some posters on ATS who falsely pretend to speak Russian, falsely pretend to be "national journalists", falsely pretend to have "family in Russia", and multiple "sudonim" IDs on ATS

LOLOLOLOL



posted on Jun, 17 2018 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: M5xaz

The Democrats supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again

Instead of building bombs from enriching uranium, NK was supplied the tool to make A bombs with plutonium from spent reactor fuel.

Educate yourself, or sober up, Bacchus.

Leftists are nothing if not experts at projecting their failings on others, in all topics, diplomacy as well as things as depraved as sexual abuse and deviancy.






Are you really arguing it's the democrats fault NK is now a nuclear power....?


How stupid must you be to supply nuclear reactors to a country known to be pursing at the time ( and now having) nuclear weapons ?


How stupid you must be to think people will believe your BS.

NEVER HAPPENED.


While their construction started and remains unfinished, William " Bill the Zipper" Clinton did sign up to supply two nuclear reactors to North Korea.

Did happen.

Deny ignorance


That's not the lie you told though.

The INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY agreed to help North Korea with Nuclear Power IF they met their agreed upon inspections and disarmament. NK failed, the west never gave them reactors etc.

You lied.


originally posted by: M5xaz


It is the LEFT, Democrats, who supplied TWO nuclear reactor to NK under Bill Clinton in the 90s.
What was achieved- ZERO again



Sorry Honey.
Wrong again and uninformed, as usual

en.wikipedia.org...
"...two light water reactors would be constructed in North Korea by 2003 at a cost of $4 billion..."

"Although the agreement had largely broken down, North Korea did not restart work on the two production size nuclear power plants that were frozen under the agreement. These plants could potentially have produced enough weapons-grade plutonium to produce several nuclear weapons per year."

Providing TWO nuclear plants that could produce A-Bombs is an idiotic idea.

I did not lie.

Not like some posters on ATS who falsely pretend to speak Russian, falsely pretend to be "national journalists", falsely pretend to have "family in Russia", and multiple "sudonim" IDs on ATS

LOLOLOLOL


Can't help stupid.

North Korea had two Nuclear Power Plants they were working on capable of creating weapons grade plutonium.

Clinton and the international community offered in an agreement to help them develop LIGHT WATER nuclear power plants.

YOU CAN'T MAKE WEAPONS GRADE PLUTONIUM WITH A LIGTH WATER REACTOR.

Your whole claim is ignorant nonsense.

Clinton did not give them Nuclear reactors, nor did he help them build ANY Nuclear power Plants.

Clinton and the International community offered to help North Korea complete their two nuclear power plants as LIGHT WATER plants that could not make weapons grade plutonium.

Honestly can't tell if you are trying to BS people or have just been propagandized.

Research the deal and history.

Research Light Water Nuclear Reactors and weapons grade plutonium.

Research why enemy states are pushed toward light water reactors.



edit on 17-6-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join