-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

a reply to: Trillium

I found the unedited version with the hand.

New Qs

Trump is "Activated"

Snopes is ?????

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

🚬🔫

Good Lord, has this board gone gluten free?

What a mess, new crumbs everywhere...

Posts 1531-1536

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Qpost 1500

Anonymous ID: 33af96 No.1762746 📁
Jun 15 2018 17:18:55 (EST)
7D14855F-3F11-46B0-BEF8-7420BF2EF055.png ⤓

Access Kills.
POTUS in good spirits today.
Morning strolls are refreshing.
2.5 hrs
Q

You know, with just a little shift-a-roo, that third line can read much differently.

Morning strolls are refreshing.

Morning's trolls are refreshing.

Hmmmm...

Anonymous ID: 33af96 No.1762746 📁
Jun 15 2018 17:18:55 (EST)
7D14855F-3F11-46B0-BEF8-7420BF2EF055.png ⤓

Access Kills.
POTUS in good spirits today.
Morning strolls are refreshing.
2.5 hrs
Q

originally posted by: xuenchen
New Qs

Trump is "Activated"

Snopes is ?????

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

🚬🔫

I didn't hear of Snopes until the 2016 election cycle. The first time I read one of their articles, Snopes was strongly debunking the legitimacy of the Hillary/Podesta Wiki-leaked emails. That pretty much ruined whatever credibility Snopes had, didn't it?

Q Post #1533 (and #1532, #1535) from qntmpkts.keybase.pub... - more DECODES (confirmed by #1535!!).

#1533:


DECODE #1
Timestamp to Acronym method gives "R@U". This is telling us in advance that POTUS is going to Retweet "Happy Father's Day" to us 7 minutes later! This is then confirmed by post #1535 showing POTUS retweeted "Happy Father's Day 7 minutes after Q's post:


DECODE #2
This is taken from the minutes difference between #1533 and the previous #1532 = 7. This is the method used to find MARKER posts... though this is not a marker post, the 7 mins diff reinforces that POTUS retweet will be 7 mins after Q's last post!!

Seems a pretty open and shut case on both decodes for a change!!

originally posted by: carewemust

I didn't hear of Snopes until the 2016 election cycle. The first time I read one of their articles, Snopes was strongly debunking the legitimacy of the Hillary/Podesta Wiki-leaked emails. That pretty much ruined whatever credibility Snopes had, didn't it?

George Soros affiliated Snopes (and its fake controlled opposition sites such as yournewswire or neonnettle) is part of a larger effort to control what people perceive as truth in the Internet, a kind of Orwellian Ministry of Truth. The "rationalist/skeptic/debunker/atheist" movement was formed to debunk anything related to the paranormal, to conspiracy theories, to illuminati, to elite-pedo-rings or anything else that helps The Great Awakening of Humanity from their slavery. They inject Billions of Dollars a year, without getting any return on investment in Google Takedown Notices, in Wikipedia editing, in website building (RationalWiki, Skeptics Dictionary), in getting on medical boards (False Memory Syndrome Foundation), infiltrating media (TED Talks, CNN Expert Panels, etc.) in creating shill armies for Reddit, ATS, etc.

They are fairly easy to detect because they are unresponsive to proof, evidence, facts, atrocities and just keep repeating their "its debunked" mantra, mockery and even outright slander and having careers ruined.

originally posted by: Simon_Boudreaux
a reply to: carewemust

I know they have that sentiment towards us mere peasants, but to be that bold about it would make me nervous. If they get that bold it would mean they're confident they can't be stopped. imo anyway.

I didn't start disliking Obama as a person until hearing his advisors describe how they were counting on the "stupidity" of the American public, for being able to push through much of the Obama agenda.

I don't know why so many people think that because they're in a "closed" meeting, there are no cellphones recording.

EXCLUSIVE: Facebook 'fact checker' who will arbitrate on 'fake news' is accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes - and its staff includes an escort-porn star and 'Vice Vixen domme'

Facebook has announced plans to check for 'fake news' using a series of organizations to assess whether stories are true One of them is a website called Snopes.com which claims to be one of the web's 'essential resources' and 'painstaking, scholarly and reliable'

It was founded by husband-and-wife Barbara and David Mikkelson, who used a letterhead claiming they were a non-existent society to start their research

Now they are divorced - with Barbara claiming in legal documents he embezzled $98,000 of company money and spent it on 'himself and prostitutes'

In a lengthy and bitter legal dispute he is claiming to be underpaid and demanding 'industry standard' or at least $360,000 a year The two also dispute what are basic facts of their case - despite Snopes.com saying its 'ownership' is committed to 'accuracy and impartiality'

Snopes.com founder David Mikkelson's new wife Elyssa Young is employed by the website as an administrator

She has worked as an escort and porn actress and despite claims website is non-political ran as a Libertarian for Congress on a 'Dump Bush' platform

Its main 'fact checker' is Kimberly LaCapria, whose blog 'ViceVixen' says she is in touch with her 'domme side' and has posted on Snopes.com while smoking pot

Who else would you want to do your fact checking for you?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
This is then confirmed by post #1535 showing POTUS retweeted "Happy Father's Day 7 minutes after Q's post

the 7 mins diff reinforces that POTUS retweet will be 7 mins after Q's last post!!

Seems a pretty open and shut case on both decodes for a change!!

Trump's actual tweet has a timestamp that says 6:42.

If anything it is a pretty open and shut case for BS.

a reply to: Skyfloating

Any plans for the 21st?

a reply to: LurkNoMore
I prefer to check sources.
Snopes provides them in most cases. But it's like wikipedia, you have to look at those sources with a critical eye.

But stick with a cryptic, anonymous blogger whose pronouncements are highly subject to interpretation. Much more fun.

Anonymous ID: dabe2d No.1790261 📁 NEW
Jun 17 2018 18:56:02 (EST)
>>1790208
Snopes is run by the left, anything but impartial fact checkers. The More they attack Q the stronger WE become….
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 734920 No.1790332 📁 NEW
Jun 17 2018 19:00:48 (EST)
>>1790261
Review lawsuit.
Review GoFundMe plea.
Review financial disclosure.
Review formation date.
Review initial investor(s).
Controlled.
Q

Review Lawsuit--Bardav v Proper Media

Review GoFundMe plea--Snopes NoFundThee

Review financial disclosure--I'm not sure how to find this for a For profit, non-publicly traded business. Anyone?

Review formation date--March 20, 2003

Review initial investor(s)--Again, with no access to the financials...,maybe its burried in the civil case.

Controlled--yes.

originally posted by: eisegesis
a reply to: Skyfloating

Any plans for the 21st?

interesting. pole shift related?

Or could it be because of the Philadelphia experiment?

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: xuenchen

ETA why would they give him a “redacted altered” report when they had to know he would get the original? It doesn’t make sense.

The many times Q has said: "These people are stupid", is to be taken as literally factual.

When you just KNOW that your party's candidate is going WIN, and you have an "insurance policy" , if the 1% chance your candidate loses, should come to pass, you can be as arrogant and crooked, as you want to be.

a reply to: carewemust

my point is they altered it after she lost.