It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jusvistn
OK... so how many Qsters were lost over the past few days? I haven't really taken the time to do a deep read on most of the posts. Just quickly watching the back and forth regarding to prove or not to prove Q.
Are we getting back into the digging? Or have we lost to the few new debunkers that came in to derail the momentum of the movement? Both sides have valid input and I respect that. There have been numerous times that a Q post can be read and give you an immediate "well, that is so vague it could be anything" Q posts coming out after a news report is not a debunk in my opinion, it is a focus point. Many of the items being pointed at as a debunk are not something that I take to heart. Most of the time I am already aware of what it is they are pointing out as it is something I noticed myself. I respect the information and the person providing it, but I draw my own conclusion. For the debunker saying "look Q posted after the article" doesn't discredit the information, it focuses it. And it has worked in a manner that has gotten both the supporters & the debunkers digging deeper and looking harder at the information.
I, for one, have never much cared about who or what Q is. What I have gravitated to is the collaboration between so many complete strangers, who have come together over a single letter to dig, research, share finding, insights & feelings.
The main message I got from Q from the start was "your president needs you". And he does. He needs the support of the people who believe in him. He needs the votes for those running in the mid-terms that will support him. He needs his supporters to show the world that we are behind him. This doesn't mean we don't hold POTUS' feet to the fire when he does something wrong, but that we support what he is trying to accomplish.
The research skills of all who have participated in this has opened the eyes of many people, both supporters & debunkers. Both sides of that coin can look at things now and see that things are not always what they appear to be, and it is opening more eyes every day.
Regardless of what/who Q is, it has formed the foundation of a movement that has grown large & strong. It has moved "We the People" to engage in critical thinking, personal responsibility for what we read, hear & believe. It has opened many eyes to connections of corruption we might not have looked at otherwise.
Q has motivated us to get out of our comfort zones & begin participating again instead of sitting idly by watching organized crime take over our country & feeling like there is nothing we can do and that we have no voice. Q HAS GIVEN US BACK THAT VOICE.
Q may be an autistic news junkie Larping on the chans.
Q may be AI collecting data about the feelings and beliefs of the population & how we absorb informtion
Q may be an insider close to Trump posting just enough information to give us a laser focus to look at what is really happening.
Why does the answer to who Q is matter?
The information that has been dug into and uncovered is REAL
The people who are participating in the movement is REAL
And the results of mass awareness, motivation & excitement is REAL
GOD Bless & Carry on.....
originally posted by: carewemust
The text below explains why those who argue that everything Q says is true, are flat out wrong.
originally posted by: Skyfloating
Thats too bad. If it doesnt, Im leaving the Planet on the next ship to the Pleiades.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: carewemust
The text below explains why those who argue that everything Q says is true, are flat out wrong.
Right now, after taking all of the Q drops in and judging with what I think is an objective eye, I've got to say that Q followers are in for a let down.
originally posted by: carewemust
Now that you've made that statement for the 12th time, will you find another interest to pursue?
originally posted by: GATruthseeker
If what Ms. Ashcraft is saying is true, can you imagine the reactions???
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Skyfloating
Link to what Ms. Ashcroft is saying?
originally posted by: Skyfloating
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Skyfloating
That's weird. No clue as to what spinal fluid from women is used for on the black market?
If you're into Dark Red Pills, here's a twitter thread on IT.
originally posted by: carewemust
Just something to toss out that's unrelated to Q, who has shown no interest in the U.S. Supreme Court, AFAIK.
Orrin Hatch let slip that Judge Amy Coney Barrett is replacing Anthony Kennedy.
www.foxnews.com...
Would a U.S. Senator know Trump's pick this far (3 days) in advance of the official 9pm Monday announcement? Hatch is pretty old too. He's retiring, with Mitt Romney (likely) replacing him.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: eisegesis
At first, "Q isn't real!"
Next, "Q isn't an insider!"
Now they say, "Q was wrong about x. He's not perfect."
Why those who are veterans of these threads can't/don't ignore the cynics, is fascinating to me.