It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

page: 181
158
<< 178  179  180    182  183  184 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

1649
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 317346 No.1973688 📁
Jun 30 2018 14:46:19 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 355946 No.1973567 📁
Jun 30 2018 14:40:09 (EST)
>>1973527
Please do not let No Name off the hook. he is a disgrace to Veterans across this great country and needs to be held accountable.

>>1973567
Think SC vote to confirm (coming).
No Name action.
Every dog has its day.
Enjoy the show.
Q
qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

Suggesting noname might get to dc for the confirmation vote and say "NO" ?

😨😲


Don't know about your suggestion but Isn't Lindsey Graham from SC? I saw that the SC person was not Gowdy. Confirm what? I was never clear about what was being said.

edit on 30-6-2018 by liveandlearn because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: BringMeThanos

Nobody is buying Nike shoes and dressing like space rangers, once that becomes a requirement to fight for what I believe is right I'll beat you to the exit.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

SC = SCOTUS in this case, not South Carolina.
Q saying that Gowdy would not be the nominee.
edit on b000000302018-06-30T18:18:05-05:0006America/ChicagoSat, 30 Jun 2018 18:18:05 -0500600000018 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: liveandlearn

SC = SCOTUS in this case, not South Carolina.
Q saying that Gowdy would not be the nominee.




Supreme Court makes since...just used to seeing SCOTUS

So, I still don't understand the context with not wanting No Name to get off the hook. Maybe it is my literal brain that doesn't allow me to think broader.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: liveandlearn

SC = SCOTUS in this case, not South Carolina.
Q saying that Gowdy would not be the nominee.




Supreme Court makes since...just used to seeing SCOTUS

So, I still don't understand the context with not wanting No Name to get off the hook. Maybe it is my literal brain that doesn't allow me to think broader.


They need his vote maybe?

Where can truth come to light?
We come together to seek truth.
Go ahead and test the validity of this site.
1 time is all it takes.
We have to stick together but there's bad actors.
Go through past posts and see what's happening.
All that matters is getting to the truth.

No Deals.
edit on 30-6-2018 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:38 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn



So, I still don't understand the context with not wanting No Name to get off the hook. Maybe it is my literal brain that doesn't allow me to think broader.

The anon was pleading for Q to hold McCain accountable for crimes he has committed, many think he will be wiggling out, possibly by faking his own death.
That is all that I got out of it.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:39 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

He's going to vote No on the Supreme Court Nominee.

That's my decode.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: xuenchen

1649
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 317346 No.1973688
Jun 30 2018 14:46:19 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 355946 No.1973567
Jun 30 2018 14:40:09 (EST)
>>1973527
Please do not let No Name off the hook. he is a disgrace to Veterans across this great country and needs to be held accountable.

>>1973567
Think SC vote to confirm (coming).
No Name action.
Every dog has its day.
Enjoy the show.
Q
qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

Suggesting noname might get to dc for the confirmation vote and say "NO" ?



Don't know about your suggestion but Isn't Lindsey Graham from SC? I saw that the SC person was not Gowdy. Confirm what? I was never clear about what was being said.


My guess "SC" means "Senate Confirmation".

Confirmation vote for SCOTUS nomination.

📙



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:44 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords


While it may be true Obama does not want to engage directly in Washington politics, including personally protesting Trump’s policies, he is using a political-organizing group he founded to do that for him. 

That nonprofit — Organizing for Action — is not exactly a household name. But it is no less than the organizing and training hub of the anti-Trump resistance. 


It blows my mind that nobody in the media bats an eye at this. Fox News and some conservative outlets included. Never before has a former president gone on the offensive against his successor like this. Where's the integrity?

On one hand, you'd figure the MSM would want to promote this unprecedented smear attempt by Obama. But then you remember that by the MSM acknowledging it, the inevitable question will be raised:"Why does Obama feel the need to protect his legacy?"

Hmmm.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Ironic, isn't it? Those big walls around his compund?

Speaks volumes.


edit on 30-6-2018 by TomLawless because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Rosinitiate

And the timing is everything


edit on 6302018 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:17 PM
link   
a reply to: MetalThunder



Man I love that song but my wife keeps telling me the lyrics are about a stalker. *shrugs*



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Rosinitiate

No. You're thinking of this one:

Now that, is about a stalker.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: Rosinitiate

And the timing is everything



Ask yourself... So many claim to speak for you, are they telling you how to think ? Or forcing you to think for yourselves... Q requires no prerequisite

Listen to your souls, it screams with truth
edit on 6302018 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Yeah you're right, I was misremembering. Two great songs.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Rosinitiate

Mandela effect.
Not your fault.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Rosinitiate

Mandela effect.
Not your fault.


Bwahaha. We'll go with that.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:49 PM
link   
Why haven't any journalists asked the White House about Q?

Why hasn't Assange appeared on the Embassy balcony or at least seen behind windows?

Why is Obama travelling to every other country that Trump is travelling to?

These are only 3 of hundreds of questions the public would like answers to.



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating




These are only 3 of hundreds of questions the public would like answers to.

I don't.

Am I not part of the public?



posted on Jun, 30 2018 @ 07:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Skyfloating




These are only 3 of hundreds of questions the public would like answers to.

I don't.

Am I not part of the public?


Sorry, I should have said "the educated public".



new topics

top topics



 
158
<< 178  179  180    182  183  184 >>

log in

join