-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

a reply to: JadeEmpire

Because there is no actual proofs, just random "connections" that people have contorted to fit their narrative, some having different meaning depending on the person etc

"Q" claims things after they happen, yet, he has been wrong many times he claimed something would happen

This image of our friend, SUBJECT #1 was definitely from behind the stockade, on the "secure" side.



Just to follow up from yesterday.

a reply to: carewemust

Also it should be noted that the batch of E-mails and texts we’ve seen have been between lovers.

It would be much more interesting, in my opinion, to see the messages between Strzok and his fellow field agents and supervisors.

Bias everywhere these days.

Proof everywhere if you are willing to expend the energy/time to look for it.

Thats kind of the whole point of Q

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Did you watch all of the hearing J&C?

If you fast forward to 5:10:00 and listen carefully after RR finishes his answer the chair recognizes the gentleman from Maryland Mr. Raskin. He opens with the comment that "the chairman has said earlier this morning this is something like a novel but he didn't say which one it was. I've been experiencing something like Alice in Wonderland"

Anyone else catch that?

Q1636
Q1638

"The key = therapist."
"Haspel must find & term clas program."

Last month we saw the therapist involved in the Ramsey death meet a demise, along with some others as the Tuscon thing erupted???

Now we see Q point back in the direction of therapists again. Even better, if you are all in in Q liberation then Gina is in fact on the case for C of the C_A demise scenario.

Now for cranky, seeing this ties a few things together again (interesting day). So the Iranian people seem to be taking care of "A" via their own empowering process. And now Q gives the first hint that Gina is going to be let loose on the C. Interesting... A very green... day...

a reply to: JadeEmpire


Congressman Jim Jordan (or Mark Meadows) told Neil Cavuto that his committee recently received a large batch of e-mails from the DOJ, as part of their document production.

They show that Strzok was working with a group of at least 28 individuals inside/outside the government. And, some of the content was "worse" than the text messages between Strzok/Page.

That's why there had to be a 2 hour highly classified Q&A last night, after the regular Strzok closed-session interview.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: JadeEmpire




They show that Strzok was working with a group of at least 28 individuals inside/outside the government. And, some of the content was "worse" than the text messages between Strzok/Page.

That's why there had to be a 2 hour highly classified Q&A last night, after the regular Strzok closed-session interview.

Maybe that was the reason for HAM radios? We still need to get to the bottom of that. Who was she communicating with?

a reply to: queenofswords

Hope you don't mind me speaking up for you TAT but this info is definitely out there. Just not the type of sauce to paste everywhere. Anons have dug it all up so have to check over "there". Not uncommon for social media to list current and former employment...

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: JadeEmpire




They show that Strzok was working with a group of at least 28 individuals inside/outside the government. And, some of the content was "worse" than the text messages between Strzok/Page.

That's why there had to be a 2 hour highly classified Q&A last night, after the regular Strzok closed-session interview.

Maybe that was the reason for HAM radios? We still need to get to the bottom of that. Who was she communicating with?

I've seen a couple of references in this thread to "someone" using ham radios, but that's all I know.

The Congressman was very tight-lipped about who those 28 people were. This was literally a DOJ "dump" to Congress that was being analyzed as he was talking to Cavuto.

originally posted by: JadeEmpire
a reply to: carewemust

Also it should be noted that the batch of E-mails and texts we’ve seen have been between lovers.

It would be much more interesting, in my opinion, to see the messages between Strzok and his fellow field agents and supervisors.

Bias everywhere these days.

They were not lovers. That is the cover. Manufactured storyline.

a reply to: carewemust

Nellie Ohr HAM radio found right here by someone you know.



a reply to: wanderingconfusion

Yes, I did catch this and it might as well have been a neon sign when I heard that.

Rosenstein was obviously nervous.

a reply to: wanderingconfusion

Yes Wand, I heard that too. Was going to pot but got diverted.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: JadeEmpire


Congressman Jim Jordan (or Mark Meadows) told Neil Cavuto that his committee recently received a large batch of e-mails from the DOJ, as part of their document production.

They show that Strzok was working with a group of at least 28 individuals inside/outside the government. And, some of the content was "worse" than the text messages between Strzok/Page.

That's why there had to be a 2 hour highly classified Q&A last night, after the regular Strzok closed-session interview.

28 individuals including Obama?

He did want to see everything.


Permission to treat the DOJ as a hostile witness?

a reply to: carewemust

From memory Bruche Ohr's wife Nellie Ohr (who worked for Fusion GPS) was one of the people we found evidence of getting a Ham radio licence!

ETA - beaten to it by J&C

OMG with this bull# newsroom shooting. LMFAO. As I was just writing that the Fox talking head blonde babe just said: "so strange the timing after they just had a drill". .

Well you know what they say about blondes. *waves to one armed blonde in a tree*

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: c545bc No.1946203 📁 
Jun 28 2018 17:19:24 (EST)

Law enforcement should interview the therapists.
Each shooter has one coincidentally.
Targets?
Relocation within 30 days of each shooting?
New name?
FBI doesn’t know this?
Spooks are hard to find?
Dream to reality.
Q

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Partners or partners?

Sounds like a great question for Rosenstein to redact.

originally posted by: JadeEmpire
a reply to: Rosinitiate

Partners or partners?

Sounds like a great question for Rosenstein to redact.

Have you read any kissy kissy texts. If she was a side dish it doesn't show through in the texts.

Could you imagine the pillow talk?

"Ah STRZOK, yes harder, harder, hit him harder."

From Bob Mendez's Site RE: Letter concerning Assange. Bob


“As the United States is still seeking clarity about the full extent of Russian intervention in our elections and Russian interference in elections across the world, it is imperative that you raise U.S. concerns with President Moreno about Ecuador’s continued support for Mr. Assange at a time when WikiLeaks continues its efforts to undermine democratic processes globally,” concluded the Senators."

NOW:

From The Hill Piece On Assange and Comey...Link

"Not included in the written proffer was an additional offer from Assange: He was willing to discuss technical evidence ruling out certain parties in the controversial leak of Democratic Party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election. The U.S. government believes those emails were hacked by Russia; Assange insists they did not come from Moscow."

Are these dems that stupid? That ill informed? Or are their minds beginning to actually rot? This letter is beyond mystifying on nearly every single level available.

originally posted by: JadeEmpire
a reply to: Rosinitiate

Partners or partners?

Sounds like a great question for Rosenstein to redact.

Ding ding ding.