Originally posted by Dr Sick
As you all kno america is at war with iraq,the thing is,why?President bush GUESSED(had no proof,just thought this up) that saddam had weapons of mass
destruction.Ok,maybe saddam did,we have no proof that he did tho,so bush went and INVADED iraq.
Dr. Sick, suppose for an instant that no weapons of mass destruction ever turn up in Iraq. What would that imply? If no WMD's in Iraq is true, then
Blair and Bush are at the heart of an enormous conspiracy, involving dozens of current and former officials and institutions — including President
Clinton, French, Russian and German leaders and intelligence services, UN inspectors and the UN itself. We know terrorism's goal is to weaken the
enemy in any way possible, even at the expense of oneself, Saddam is perhaps the ultimate terrorist, and it's a good thing he's gone.
We know that Iraq had at least 1.77 tons of low enriched uranium because we have it stored in Tennessee.
The IAEA found five pounds of radioactive uranium oxide (yellowcake) in a shipment of scrap metal at Rotterdam harbor. The metal came from Iraq via a
dealer in Jordan.
In a letter from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei to the UN Security Council. ElBaradei wrote that
commercial satellite imagery revealed “extensive removal of equipment and, in some instances…entire buildings” from Iraqi nuclear facilities.
In October 2003, retired Air Force Lt. Gen. James Clapper, head of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, revealed that vehicle traffic photographed
by U.S. spy satellites indicated that material and documents related to Saddam's forbidden WMD programs had been shipped to Syria before the war.
Sick, old friend, just what do WMD's look like? Did you expect us to find an Iraqi Manhatten Project? Row upon row of bombs with, "Danger - No
Smoking within 50 miles of Atomic Warhead" stenciled on it? Barrels of oozing gooy like substance belived to be chemical in nature because there
was no living thing within 25 miles?
Saddam didn't get much media coverage when he confessed to having WMD's? Dan "Faked Documents" Rather didn't do a 20/20 about it nor did little
miss, "Does this dress make me look fat", Katie Couric.
A report by Charles Duelfer makes very interesting reading for those who really want to know. For those with a closed mind, it will be a waste of
The media continues to insist the Bush administration's case for Iraq's WMD was seriously flawed. And the Left still claims Bush Lied! about Iraq's
possession of WMD. How many finds of chemical weapons and related materials are needed to convince the media and the Left that Iraq possessed them? I
expect the "Three Stoogies Of Media Bias" will be there to televise the newly elected DNC, Howard Dean, when holds a news conference and suggest the
US should now surrender.
I’ll tell you one thing though. I’m sick and tired of hearin’ whiny, skinny liberals braying on like a bunch of jackasses to the moon about what
we’ve been doin’ wrong since we went into IRAQ. Forget all this stuff about W.M.D.'s though. It’s not good for your precious indigestion and
believe me when I tell you that you’re the only ones having any trouble sleeping at night.