It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stellasag
Personally, I believe the Bible is real and very valid. How could such a motley bunch of individuals (Moses would have been highly educated whilst living in Egypt, Peter was a fisherman, Daniel became on par with a modern Prime Minister etc) contribute to a book that is overwhelmingly uniform in prose, thought and direction? To me, there seems to just have been one Author.
And that's my two cents!
Originally posted by edsinger
Amuk I do not have the time to get the numbers, but the last figure I saw said the odds of the code being but chance in just the Isaiah one I quoted above were well over 10^80th power, that to an engineer is close to what the Calculus refers to as INFINITY.
I can not put a physical object in your hands that you can hold to prove it to you.............it cant be done and that is ON PURPOSE. It is a faith thing but the signs are there.......
Originally posted by edsinger
THE BEGINNING
If we do exist, there are only two possible explanations as to how our existence came to be. Either we had a beginning or we did not have a beginning. The Bible says, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth" (Genesis 1 :1). The atheist has always maintained that there was no beginning. The idea is that matter has always existed in the form of either matter or energy; and all that has happened is that matter has been changed from form to
form, but it has always been. The Humanist Manifesto says, "Matter is self-existing and not created," and that is a concise statement of the atheist's belief.
The way we decide whether the atheist is correct or not is to see what science has discovered about this question. The picture below on the left represents our part of the cosmos. Each of the disk shaped objects is a galaxy like our Milky Way. All of these galaxies are moving relative to each other. Their movement has a very distinct pattern which causes the distance between the galaxies to get greater with every passing day. If we had three galaxies located at positions A, B. and C in the second diagram below, and if they are located as shown, tomorrow they will be further apart. The triangle they form will be bigger. The day after tomorrow the triangle will be bigger yet. We live in an expanding universe that gets bigger and bigger and bigger with every passing day.
Now let us suppose that we made time run backwards! If we are located at a certain distance today, then yesterday we were closer together. The day before that, we were still closer. Ultimately, where must all the galaxies have been? At a point! At the beginning! At what scientists call a singularity!
THE CAUSE
If we know the creation has a beginning, we are faced with another logical question_was the creation caused or was it not caused? The Bible states, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Not only does the Bible maintain that there was a cause_a creation_but it also tells us what the cause was. It was God. The atheist tells us that "matter is self-existing and not created." If matter had a beginning and yet was uncaused, one must logically maintain that something would have had to come into existence out of nothing. From empty space with no force, no matter, no energy, and no intelligence, matter would have to become existent. Even if this could happen by some strange new process unknown to science today, there is a logical problem.
In order for matter to come out of nothing, all of our scientific laws dealing with the conservation of matter/energy would have to be wrong, invalidating all of chemistry. All of our laws of conservation of angular momentum would have to be wrong, invalidating all of physics. All of our laws of conservation of electric charge would have to be wrong, invalidating all of electronics and demanding that your TV set not work!! Your television set may not work, but that is not the reason! In order to believe matter is uncaused, one has to discard known laws and principles of science. No reasonable person is going to do this simply to maintain a personal atheistic position.
The atheist's assertion that matter is eternal is wrong. The atheist's assertion that the universe is uncaused and selfexisting is also incorrect The Bible's assertion that there was a beginning which was caused is supported strongly by the available scientific evidence
THE DESIGN
If we know that the creation had a beginning and we know that the beginning was caused, there is one last question for us to answer--what was the cause? The Bible tells us that God was the cause. We are further told that the God who did the causing did so with planning and reason and logic. Romans 1:20 tells us that we can know God is
"through the things he has made." The atheist, on the other hand, will try to convince us that we are the product of chance. Julian Huxley once said:
We are as much a product of blind forces as is the falling of a stone to earth or the ebb and flow of the tides. We have just happened, and man was made flesh by a long series of singularly beneficial accidents.
The subject of design has been one that has been explored in many different ways. For most of us, simply looking at our newborn child is enough to rule out chance. Modern-day scientists like Paul Davies and Frederick Hoyle and others are raising elaborate objections to the use of chance in explaining natural phenomena. A principle of modern science has emerged in the 1980s called "the anthropic principle." The basic thrust of the anthropic principle is that chance is simply not a valid mechanism to explain the atom or life. If chance is not valid, we are constrained to reject Huxley's claim and to realize that we are the product of an intelligent God.
this site makes a good rational case imho, but again it must be your own journey the time when you look up and ask why? Then naturally you will ask who?
A PRACTICAL MAN'S PROOF OF GOD
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by Amuk
Originally posted by edsinger
Because God is not bound by the Physics that you and I are.......He is after all the Creator right?
If I understand the idea of the singularity it was not bound by physics either. Everything started with it. Before it there were neither time or space.
Why is that impossible but God is not.
Try explaining without saying because the Bible says so.
Ok an all powerful 'creator' creates the universe yet limits the power 'He' can yield within His creation?
God always was, is, and always will be....................
Humans are not meant to understand that, heck we barely understand creation let alone how it was done.......
Originally posted by Amuk
Originally posted by infinite
What more evidence do you want??
How about evidence the universe is 6000 years old?
Originally posted by babloyi
Haven't read the entire bible either, but God not creating the universe would be a pretty big thing to miss. The first sentence in Genesis is "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth". Generally taken to mean "The Universe".
My evidence against the Bible is pretty simple. If God wrote it (or "inspired" it to be written), WHY is it SO complicated? It is so difficult to understand that Christians have to come up with a new theory every few years just to make it valid. If it was indeed attributed to God, it should be the clearest simplest and most enthralling book ever. God would be the greatest author (or co-author) ever, so the Bible should have been on the Best Seller lists since even before there was a best seller list.
It is no use saying that "you must be filled with the holy spirit to understand it" or "you have to study it many years before understanding it". If it were truly the God inspired story of Jesus, it should be obvious to even the most skeptical person. If the Bible was the word of God, there would be no need for Christians to go through all the trouble of converting people. They would just hand them a bible.
Originally posted by Eyeofhorus
Pirate to pirate.
The bible is formatted to be open to interpretation by the individual, in order to make them decide between good and evil, what behaviors are good and which are bad. Unfortunately this also has the oppisite effect too, people assume that the bible allows certain sins and others are condemned. It is a way to coax the person to put forth effort and find god, by living as jesus did. That's all really.
Don't beilieve in the bible really, it is just heresay to me, but it still is a path to spiritual enlightenment, and that I will not deny.
Originally posted by naughtonbynature
1. The new testment and the old testiment were wrote over a long period groups of years. Yet the new testement fulfilles the old testiment in all ways. No evidence has ever proven that the new testment does not contridict the old testiment.
2. In the bible, varies time Jesus was claimed to be perfect in various books, he also did what the old testement commanded.
There is yet, no evidence shown once that he contridicted the old testement. He lived a perfect life, and it is backed by the old testament.