It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Azureblue
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
Could globalism be a good thing? Could one-world government and New World Order be something we should strive for?
I had a hard time finding exactly what the one-world, globalist, NWO agenda is about, and why we should fear it--or if it even exists. Most of my searches led to shady blogs and annoying youtube vids.
What is really going on?
Nice to have an overview of the landscape...…….and thanks for the heads-up.
If you are genuinely interested in finding out what the NWO agenda is, then read this.
Its 12 pages long and there are over 100 things that D Day said would happen. Only in the last month or so, one more thing got rolled out which was linking health care to employment in the US for the first time.
‘Everything Is In Place And Nobody Can Stop Us Now’ – Dr Day 1969 Lecture
December 27, 2014 by Dalia Mae 27 Comments (Gumshoe News)
This is a transcript of two out of three tapes on the “New World System” recorded in 1988, published at rense.com. They are Dr. Lawrence Dunegan’s recollections of a lecture he attended on March 20, 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society. The speaker was Richard Day, MD. Dunegan first revealed this on the Randy Engels radio show. His son is now creating a website to preserve the tapes.
The following is an abbreviation (boldings by Mary Maxwell):
Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now.
He [Dr Day] indicated that there is much more co-operation between East and West than most people realise.
Most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments don’t really understand how and where decisions are made.
People who really influence decisions are names that for the most part would be familiar to most of us, but he would not
His purpose in telling our group about these changes that were to be brought about was to make it easier for us to adapt to these changes.
One of the statements had to do with change. “People will have to get used to the idea of change, so used to change, that they’ll be expecting change. Nothing will be permanent.” This in the context of a society where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known.
“People are too trusting, they don’t ask the right questions.”1. Everything
“Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system.
Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and pollute the world with our waste.
People won’t be allowed to have babies just because they want to. Some people would be allowed only one, however outstanding people might be selected and allowed to have three.
Contraceptives would be displayed more prominently in drug stores, right up with the cigarettes and chewing gum. Contraceptives would be advertised and also dispensed in the schools in association with sex education!
Sex Education is a tool of world government. Many cities in the United States by this time have already set up school-based clinics, which are primarily contraception, birth control, population control clinics.
Now back in 1969, four years before Roe vs. Wade, he said, “Abortion will no longer be a crime.” “People will be given permission to be homosexual.” Clothing would be more stimulating and provocative. Bras would be thinner and softer allowing more natural movement.
Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be very common. More women will work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable. Travel would be easier, less expensive, for a while, so that people who did have to travel would feel they could get back to their families…. Rather a diabolical approach to this whole thing!
Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no longer useful. They become a burden. Some things that would help people realize that they had lived long enough, e.g., the use of very pale printing ink on forms that are necessary to fill out. Older people wouldn’t be able to read the pale ink as easily and would need to go to younger people for help.
Automobile — there would be more high-speed traffic lanes that older people with their slower reflexes would have trouble dealing with and thus, loses some of their independence.
The cost of medical care would be made burdensomely high. Medical care would be connected very closely with one’s work but also would be made very, very high in cost so that it would simply be unavailable to people beyond a certain time.
The young would become agreeable to helping Mom and Dad along the way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity. Then the example was – there could be a nice, farewell party, a real celebration. Mom and Dad had done a good job. Then after the party’s over they take the ‘demise pill’.
There would be profound changes in the practice of medicine. Overall, it would be much more tightly controlled. “Congress is not going to go along with national health insurance, it is now, abundantly evident. But it’s not necessary, we have other ways to control health care”. Costs would be forced up so that people won’t be able to afford to go without insurance. People pay for it, you’re entitled to it. Your role being responsible for your own care would be diminished.
The insurance company, paying for your care, does not pay that same amount. If you are charged, say, $600 for the use of an operating room, the insurance company does not pay $600; they only pay $300 or $400. You would feel grateful for insurance.
Identification would be needed to get into the building. The security in and around hospitals would be established and gradually increased so that nobody without identification could get in or move around inside the building. Theft of hospital equipment, things like typewriters and microscopes and so forth would be ‘allowed’ and exaggerated; reports of it would be exaggerated so that this would be the excuse needed to establish the need for strict security until people got used to it.
This need for ID would start in small ways: hospitals, some businesses, gradually expand to include everybody in all places!
It was observed that hospitals can be used to confine people and for the treatment of criminals.
Another area of discussion was Religion. He said, “Religion is not necessarily bad. A lot of people seem to need religion, with its mysteries and rituals – so they will have religion. But the major religions of today have to be changed because they are not compatible with the changes to come. The old religions will have to go especially Christianity. Once the Roman Catholic Church is brought down, the rest of Christianity will follow easily. Then a new religion can be accepted for use all over the world.
In order to do this, the Bible will be changed. It will be rewritten to fit the new religion. Gradually, key words will be replaced with new words having various shades of meaning.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha
If you want to live in 3rd world conditions, if you want to end property rights and see all real property including your home confiscated, if you want to live your life in a cement box in a huge block apartment building and if you want to have only one meal a day, soylent green soup and if you want to live a life where the furthest you can travel is the end of the mass transit line..................join up with the Agenda 21 Globalist Elites.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Lab4Us
See this is where things go off tangent. Irishhaf assumed the US would lead in ruling the planet.
You respond to that and start mentioning the constitution.
PS For your assumptions you are reminded this is an international site.
originally posted by: Subrosabelow
The Georgia Guidestones
Points 1 and 2 should concern you with big huge blaring alarm bells.
How does the population get below 500 million without some blatant culling of the human population? Increases in famine? Diseases allowed to run their courses in third world countries? All encompassing world wars?
"Guide Reproduction Wisely?" So, someone out there has the right and power to tell a couple they're not of good enough genetic stock to reproduce? Will people who are deemed unfit be sterilized? Will the inevitable child born with a life affecting issue be put down for the sake of keeping the human genome pure?
If those two things do not scare you, then I really don't know what to say.
A globalist government is giving a few individuals with great power and money the right to rule over you regardless of your interests, culture, morality, regional laws, etc. This is not a good thing in my view. Looking at the chaos happening right now in the EU, do you want those people... the UN... to be able to shut you down and tell you how to live even though they're across the ocean and have zero concept of how you live on a daily basis?
Sorry. I don't want that.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: jinni73
Well, if you're in the UK, maybe you could emigrate to Canada or Australia?