It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judicial Watch Uncovers Hidden Strzok Emails and some Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting Docs

page: 1
39
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+13 more 
posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Nightmare maker Judicial Watch has got some "just released" Strzok/Page emails.

Seems to be some conflicts of timing about Comey and some info about the famous "Tarmac" meeting that had Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch talking about golf and grandkids.

A little different story comes into The.Sunlight when we see the real McCoy.

Judicial Watch Uncovers Hidden Strzok Emails in Latest Production of Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting Docs—Strzok Email Suggests Clinton Investigation Decision Made in April 2016

Judicial Watch today released 16 pages of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documents related to the June 2016 tarmac meeting between former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton showing involvement of the FBI’s former Chief of Counterespionage Peter Strzok.

The FBI originally informed Judicial Watch they could not locate any records related to the tarmac meeting.  However, in a related FOIA lawsuit, the Justice Department located emails in which Justice Department officials communicated with the FBI and wrote that they had communicated with the FBI.  As a result, by letter dated August 10, 2017, the FBI stated, “Upon further review, we subsequently determined potentially responsive documents may exist. As a result, your [FOIA] request has been reopened …” This is the second batch of documents the FBI produced since telling Judicial Watch they had no tarmac-related records.


In a previously unseen email, on July 1, 2016, Strzok forwarded to Bill Priestap, assistant director of FBI counterintelligence, and other FBI officials an article in The New York Times titled then “ Lynch to Remove Herself From Decision Over Clinton Emails, Official Says.” Priestap comments on it, saying: “The meeting in PX is all over CNN TV news this morning …” Strzok replies: “Timing’s not ideal in that it falsely adds to those seeking the ‘this is all choreographed’ narrative. But I don’t think it’s worth changing … later won’t be better.” Priestap responds “Agreed.”



+8 more 
posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 06:50 PM
link   
So the FBI was anti- American, Please President Trump, FIRE them treasonous SOB
edit on 0600000004512018-06-08T18:51:04-05:00510406pm6 by musicismagic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Lynch Lynch!



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: musicismagic
So the FBI was anti- American, Please President Trump, FIRE them treasonous SOB


So Xue can you explain how them not delaying the Comey press conference is some how a "nightmare"? Did you read the actual article you posted or notice how JW gave the answer to their own questions about the emails later in the article?


+13 more 
posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 07:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

So Xue can you explain how them not delaying the Comey press conference is some how a "nightmare"?


You're not tracking well. Xue's phrase as "nightmare maker Judicial Watch" which refers not to any specific disclosure by Judicial Watch, but to their ability to "make nightmares" for those folks who get investigated by Judicial Watch and wind up embarrassed by the revelations.
edit on 6/8/2018 by schuyler because: (no reason given)


+11 more 
posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 07:16 PM
link   
The report discussed in some of the emails says that the FBI allowed no photos/video on the tarmac---even of a journalist. If that's true it just keeps getting stinkier. These bastards gotta go.



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: musicismagic
So the FBI was anti- American, Please President Trump, FIRE them treasonous SOB


So Xue can you explain how them not delaying the Comey press conference is some how a "nightmare"? Did you read the actual article you posted or notice how JW gave the answer to their own questions about the emails later in the article?


"Do not be too hard to suit or you may have to be content with the worst or with nothing at all"

🤧



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 09:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
These bastards gotta go.

I'm gonna agree wholeheartedly.

Everyone keeps talking about how the rank-and-file are mostly good people. Well, how come a few of 'em didn't step up to the plate and slap the cuffs on the ne'er-do-wells?

Time to scrap the whole lot of 'em. And, while they're at it, revoke the pensions of all the retirees to send the point home. n You'd never see that crap happen in a government bureaucracy again.



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: musicismagic
So the FBI was anti- American, Please President Trump, FIRE them treasonous SOB


So Xue can you explain how them not delaying the Comey press conference is some how a "nightmare"? Did you read the actual article you posted or notice how JW gave the answer to their own questions about the emails later in the article?


"Do not be too hard to suit or you may have to be content with the worst or with nothing at all"

🤧


So you dont even understand your own post or dont care enough to explain it or didnt even read it to begin with? How are these emails damaging? The part you quoted and highlighted is them talking about not changing the date of a press conference. How is the damaging and bad?



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: Pyle

So Xue can you explain how them not delaying the Comey press conference is some how a "nightmare"?


You're not tracking well. Xue's phrase as "nightmare maker Judicial Watch" which refers not to any specific disclosure by Judicial Watch, but to their ability to "make nightmares" for those folks who get investigated by Judicial Watch and wind up embarrassed by the revelations.


Which would mean JW exposing this would be a nightmare for people. Its obviously is not So was Xue attempting to slide peoples thought towards assuming this must be something damaging from the outset of the op?



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deplorable

originally posted by: The GUT
These bastards gotta go.

I'm gonna agree wholeheartedly.

Everyone keeps talking about how the rank-and-file are mostly good people. Well, how come a few of 'em didn't step up to the plate and slap the cuffs on the ne'er-do-wells?

Time to scrap the whole lot of 'em. And, while they're at it, revoke the pensions of all the retirees to send the point home. n You'd never see that crap happen in a government bureaucracy again.


I agree, we should revoke the pensions of these people. Unless they come forth and tell the truth about what was going on. Also, maybe we should consider making them pay back money they got already if we find they broke the law while on their job.



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 11:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: Pyle

So Xue can you explain how them not delaying the Comey press conference is some how a "nightmare"?


You're not tracking well. Xue's phrase as "nightmare maker Judicial Watch" which refers not to any specific disclosure by Judicial Watch, but to their ability to "make nightmares" for those folks who get investigated by Judicial Watch and wind up embarrassed by the revelations.


Which would mean JW exposing this would be a nightmare for people. Its obviously is not So was Xue attempting to slide peoples thought towards assuming this must be something damaging from the outset of the op?


Just read it again. Now think back to elementary school English. Does it make more sense now or are you going to continue with the nonsense.



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

Yes, I have read it, otherwise I wouldnt be here talking minutia with Xue and his defenders.



posted on Jun, 8 2018 @ 11:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: musicismagic
So the FBI was anti- American, Please President Trump, FIRE them treasonous SOB


FBI needs a fund raiser event for Chinese Girl Scouts and their Cookie drive.

💮



posted on Jun, 9 2018 @ 12:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: Deplorable

originally posted by: The GUT
These bastards gotta go.

I'm gonna agree wholeheartedly.

Everyone keeps talking about how the rank-and-file are mostly good people. Well, how come a few of 'em didn't step up to the plate and slap the cuffs on the ne'er-do-wells?

Time to scrap the whole lot of 'em. And, while they're at it, revoke the pensions of all the retirees to send the point home. n You'd never see that crap happen in a government bureaucracy again.


I agree, we should revoke the pensions of these people. Unless they come forth and tell the truth about what was going on. Also, maybe we should consider making them pay back money they got already if we find they broke the law while on their job.


"GUILTY UNTIL WE SAY YOU ARE NOT!" Also that thing we guaranteed you get on retirement so you will take a pay downgrade from public sector "GONE BECAUSE "F" YOU!"

BTW we do fine people as well as jail them. We also have forfeiture of assets that we made during fraudulent activities. So we have it covered without your undemocratic methods.



posted on Jun, 9 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: Deplorable

originally posted by: The GUT
These bastards gotta go.

I'm gonna agree wholeheartedly.

Everyone keeps talking about how the rank-and-file are mostly good people. Well, how come a few of 'em didn't step up to the plate and slap the cuffs on the ne'er-do-wells?

Time to scrap the whole lot of 'em. And, while they're at it, revoke the pensions of all the retirees to send the point home. n You'd never see that crap happen in a government bureaucracy again.


I agree, we should revoke the pensions of these people. Unless they come forth and tell the truth about what was going on. Also, maybe we should consider making them pay back money they got already if we find they broke the law while on their job.


"GUILTY UNTIL WE SAY YOU ARE NOT!" Also that thing we guaranteed you get on retirement so you will take a pay downgrade from public sector "GONE BECAUSE "F" YOU!"

BTW we do fine people as well as jail them. We also have forfeiture of assets that we made during fraudulent activities. So we have it covered without your undemocratic methods.



But, the high courts will probably not do anything because those laws govern us, not the people way way up in the government. Most of those people way up also get personal liability insurance as part of their package, it covers anything they do wrong as long as they did not commit a felony, which usually never get charged with, they make a deal.



posted on Jun, 9 2018 @ 12:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: Deplorable

originally posted by: The GUT
These bastards gotta go.

I'm gonna agree wholeheartedly.

Everyone keeps talking about how the rank-and-file are mostly good people. Well, how come a few of 'em didn't step up to the plate and slap the cuffs on the ne'er-do-wells?

Time to scrap the whole lot of 'em. And, while they're at it, revoke the pensions of all the retirees to send the point home. n You'd never see that crap happen in a government bureaucracy again.


I agree, we should revoke the pensions of these people. Unless they come forth and tell the truth about what was going on. Also, maybe we should consider making them pay back money they got already if we find they broke the law while on their job.


"GUILTY UNTIL WE SAY YOU ARE NOT!" Also that thing we guaranteed you get on retirement so you will take a pay downgrade from public sector "GONE BECAUSE "F" YOU!"

BTW we do fine people as well as jail them. We also have forfeiture of assets that we made during fraudulent activities. So we have it covered without your undemocratic methods.



Can you please explain the reason for your strange behavior?



posted on Jun, 9 2018 @ 01:06 AM
link   
Huh, who's this dude?



Interesting..

edition.cnn.com...




edit on 9/6/18 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2018 @ 01:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Wasn't that Comey's boy who went to CNN after Comey was fired? SPYGATE got you fired? Come to CNN to continue your work!! We have 3-letters too!




edit on 9-6-2018 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 9 2018 @ 01:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: c2oden

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: Deplorable

originally posted by: The GUT
These bastards gotta go.

I'm gonna agree wholeheartedly.

Everyone keeps talking about how the rank-and-file are mostly good people. Well, how come a few of 'em didn't step up to the plate and slap the cuffs on the ne'er-do-wells?

Time to scrap the whole lot of 'em. And, while they're at it, revoke the pensions of all the retirees to send the point home. n You'd never see that crap happen in a government bureaucracy again.


I agree, we should revoke the pensions of these people. Unless they come forth and tell the truth about what was going on. Also, maybe we should consider making them pay back money they got already if we find they broke the law while on their job.


"GUILTY UNTIL WE SAY YOU ARE NOT!" Also that thing we guaranteed you get on retirement so you will take a pay downgrade from public sector "GONE BECAUSE "F" YOU!"

BTW we do fine people as well as jail them. We also have forfeiture of assets that we made during fraudulent activities. So we have it covered without your undemocratic methods.



Can you please explain the reason for your strange behavior?


No, because you need to specify what you consider strange behavior. You all so need to go back and read the posts I am talking about and maybe then you will not think the behavior is strange.







 
39
<<   2 >>

log in

join