It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SlapTheGinkels
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: xuenchen
I'm curious how many ATS'ers left California, for one reason or another, and are glad they did, or at least wouldn't return.
I'm one of them....
I left California and moved to Idaho, best decision I ever made.
Last year (between July 2015 and July 2016) the Census Bureau also identified eight states with population losses, but it has since revised those numbers, taking Mississippi and New York off the list.
According to this year’s state population estimate, Alaska, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, West Virginia and Wyoming all lost population between 2016 and 2017. The states that lost population between 2015 and 2016 were Connecticut, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Vermont, West Virginia and Wyoming.
The last time eight states lost population in one year was between 1986 and 1987, when a collapse in oil prices hit the economies of energy-producing states.
In the latest estimates, Illinois lost the most population (33,703), followed by West Virginia (12,780), Wyoming (5,595), Louisiana (1,824), Alaska (1,727), Mississippi (1,315), Hawaii (1,145) and North Dakota (155). For Hawaii, Louisiana and North Dakota it was the first population drop of the decade so far.
Idaho was the nation’s fastest-growing state between 2016 and 2017, with a population increase of 2.2 percent, to 1.7 million. Following Idaho were Nevada (2 percent), Utah (1.9 percent), Washington (1.7 percent), and Florida and Arizona (1.6 percent).
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: xuenchen
I'm curious how many ATS'ers left California, for one reason or another, and are glad they did, or at least wouldn't return.
I'm one of them....
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: soberbacchus
It's even funnier how, say, your NBC2 link editorializes the idea that increased Republican names on the ballot would be a "crisis."
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: soberbacchus
Yeah, I guess that it does depend on how one reads the headline, I'll give you that.
But for the people of California, I would argue that a crisis was created by all of the millions that the DNC poured into state primaries...and by California switching to such a horrible primary system (which, in a state like California. obviously allows for a massive exclusion of Republicans on the ballot).
Buuuuuut...meh. I haven't moved back there for a reason, so I suppose that it only indirectly affects me.