UFO Caught During Live ESPN Broadcast On June 4?

Has anyone mentioned the obvious wings flapping yet?

Ref: www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Has anyone mentioned the obvious wings flapping yet?

Ref: www.abovetopsecret.com...

I connected my laptop to my big TV for a better look I can see some flapping that I couldnt see on my laptop.

So its a bird I still appreciate the post OP .

a reply to: anomalie

In my analysis frame by frame in closeup slowmotion
there were not a sign of flapping among the frames
meaning the object presents the same shape without
any change therefore No Flapping, Not a Bird.
I posted the seqience in closeup & slowmotion frame
by frame, check the images. To claim this is a bird
requires graphic evidence to support the claim. Mere
words proves nothing. This object is not a bird., must
be something else.

a reply to: anomalie

In my analysis frame by frame in closeup slowmotion
there were not a sign of flapping among the frames
meaning the object presents the same shape without
any change therefore No Flapping, Not a Bird.
I posted the seqience in closeup & slowmotion frame
by frame, check the images. To claim this is a bird
requires graphic evidence to support the claim. Mere
words proves nothing. This object is not a bird., must
be something else.

a reply to: anomalie

The last photo of the UFO appears to be in front of the rooftop chimney. How is this possible ?

Cheers for the pics


have you ever walked, driven, stood in front of anything?

Its possible, trust me.

Now compare these birds pics with the UFO frame captures from 3.28 mark.

yes

wth????

The birds were flapping and flying behind the chimney and the later object could easily be another bird gliding in front of the chimney.

a reply to: free_spirit


Birds can just glide - seagulls do this a lot.

originally posted by: free_spirit
a reply to: anomalie

In my analysis frame by frame in closeup slowmotion
there were not a sign of flapping among the frames
meaning the object presents the same shape without
any change therefore No Flapping, Not a Bird.
I posted the seqience in closeup & slowmotion frame
by frame, check the images. To claim this is a bird
requires graphic evidence to support the claim. Mere
words proves nothing. This object is not a bird., must
be something else.

I know what youre saying my first few viewings the object appears to be consistent in shape from beginning to end I can't see any evidence of flapping. I done the frame by frame thing and still could'nt see it..its only when I hooked up my laptop to the telly I could see signs of flapping. I can't ignore this fact plus the object appears to be in front of chimney and not behind it indicating the object is actually closer and smaller than it looks in the video. Had they been no signs of flapping and object flew behind the building I would still be questioning it.

Look at these frame captures at mark 3.27 notice the dark edge/light/shadow on the sides of the object classic sign of birds pics; and yes it could be something else other than bird I grant you that but its looking a lot like a bird now.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: anomalie

The last photo of the UFO appears to be in front of the rooftop chimney. How is this possible ?

Cheers for the pics


have you ever walked, driven, stood in front of anything?

Its possible, trust me.

Now compare these birds pics with the UFO frame captures from 3.28 mark.

yes

wth????

The birds were flapping and flying behind the chimney and the later object could easily be another bird gliding in front of the chimney.

Fair comment I never really elaboarted on the 'possible' part. The object appears to be flying behind the building so in the last frame when it appeared to be in front of the chimney that did'nt really make sense to me. I read somewhere (probably on ATS) sometimes under certain conditions foreground objects can appear to be in the background but this isnt the case in this situation.

If its a bird or whatever..I thinks its just the one not two.

.

a reply to: montybd

Good observation. Thanks

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Did anyone notice around the 3:23 mark, something hover from one window to the next before that thing speeds by?

Looked like a bird gliding by (seagull came to mind) on my first watch. I would not have looked further if I saw that live, and I def believe in UFOs. Worth posting though, but too inconclusive to point at UFO even if it was one.

originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Did anyone notice around the 3:23 mark, something hover from one window to the next before that thing speeds by?

Do you mean this at the 3.23 mark ?



If so then its a bird heres the bird on the buliding a couple of seconds before it took flight at 3.21 mark.

hmmm, bird probally

It's a bird. After literally two seconds of watching, it was obvious. You can see the wings flapping.

a reply to: anomalie

Possibly. I thought I saw it hover from the window just to the left, to the window the UFO appears in first. It dips down and then pops back up.

a reply to: fleabit

That's the fastest bird I've ever seen.

originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: fleabit

That's the fastest bird I've ever seen.

Also the world's biggest of all time, a true Guinnes Record if I may say,
capable of being identified at that distance from a tv monitor inside a
tv studio, a super bird indeed.

The most surprising thing is that some people claim to see " Flapping "
wich at these instances result a very common "cliche by default" and
without providing any kind of graphic evidence to prove the shape of
the object changes every frame of the footage then "Flapping" result
a common bluff. It's very easy to bluff anybody can bluff. But to prove
something with evidence that is the real challenge. This is a good case
provided by a good source ESPN, the footage is of a very good resolution
to be analyzed. I did my own analysis and posted here the sequences
in closeup without pixelization. The shape of the object is consistent
in every frame in slowmotion. Measuring the distance according to
the perspective the object is certainly big in size.

This is my personal conclusion at this time, still a unidentified object.
Some people are so anxious to solve the case quickly that they recur
to the bluff. Very easy indeed but not a valid argument, not with an
evidence. And the worst bluff is " An extraterrestial ship from another
world" Let' see who is the one to mention the ET option.

originally posted by: free_spirit

originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: fleabit

That's the fastest bird I've ever seen.

Also the world's biggest of all time, a true Guinnes Record if I may say,
capable of being identified at that distance from a tv monitor inside a
tv studio, a super bird indeed.

The most surprising thing is that some people claim to see " Flapping "
wich at these instances result a very common "cliche by default" and
without providing any kind of graphic evidence to prove the shape of
the object changes every frame of the footage then "Flapping" result
a common bluff. It's very easy to bluff anybody can bluff. But to prove
something with evidence that is the real challenge. This is a good case
provided by a good source ESPN, the footage is of a very good resolution
to be analyzed. I did my own analysis and posted here the sequences
in closeup without pixelization. The shape of the object is consistent
in every frame in slowmotion. Measuring the distance according to
the perspective the object is certainly big in size.

This is my personal conclusion at this time, still a unidentified object.
Some people are so anxious to solve the case quickly that they recur
to the bluff. Very easy indeed but not a valid argument, not with an
evidence. And the worst bluff is " An extraterrestial ship from another
world" Let' see who is the one to mention the ET option.

That wasn't anything flapping on that thing.