It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Supreme Court hands narrow win to baker over gay couple dispute

page: 3
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
I bet the gay community is really butthurt about this,,,,,,,,,oh wait...


I'd say those for separation of church and state.

This decision is wrong.




posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
I bet the gay community is really butthurt about this,,,,,,,,,oh wait...


i bet there is an app for that

yep preparation h will be sent out to all those involved with the butthurtness



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

It's not a government owned business.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

right or wrong how will this effect other cases?

you said it will effect others but the scotus disagrees



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

It wasn't about the cake.

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.


It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Annee

It's not a government owned business.


It affects every citizen.

Now government mandated.

For me it's still about separation of church and state.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee

It wasn't about the cake.

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.


It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.


Have you followed this case from Day 1?

I have.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Annee

It's not a government owned business.


It affects every citizen.

Now government mandated.

For me it's still about separation of church and state.


It doesn't really effect everyone. My wife and I had strawberry shortcake for our wedding.

There are other makers.

You can't control d bags from being d bags. You can only choose to support non d bags.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

What's that have to do with anything?

It's right there in black and white. Read it or don't.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: lakenheath24
Good. And if a muslim baker doesnt want to make a jeezus cake then thats ok too. This was a pub stunt in the 1st place and just wastes court time and money....plus needlessly ruins a persons life. a reply to: howtonhawky



The cake was a genetic cake from their catalog.

This decision is so wrong.


The cake was custom ordered.

Stop it 🚪🚬



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
I bet the gay community is really butthurt about this,,,,,,,,,oh wait...


I'd say those for separation of church and state.

This decision is wrong.


The Colorado Commission discriminated and was unfair.

☣💫



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee

It wasn't about the cake.

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.


It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.


Have you followed this case from Day 1?

I have.


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLL

That is classic case of the universe wasting your time


5 yrs of being wrong and you deserve a medal for your efforts



edit on 4-6-2018 by howtonhawky because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee

It wasn't about the cake.

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.


It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.


Have you followed this case from Day 1?

I have.


And it seems your knowledge ended on Day 1 too.

😳



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Annee

It's not a government owned business.


It affects every citizen.

Now government mandated.

For me it's still about separation of church and state.


It ensures freedom of religion and freedom from religious prosecutions by government agencies.

👋🤦



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

It's only fair for religious people to discriminate.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee

It wasn't about the cake.

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.


It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.


Right. SCOTUS didn't rule that Colorado's law against discrimination of gay people trampled anyone's religious rights. The law still stands.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee




For me it's still about separation of church and state.


It doesn't matter what it's about to you.

What does matter is what the case was really about. Had you actually read the SCOTUS decision and why it applied so widely(7-2) you'd know that this has NOTHING to do with separation of church and state and everything to do with a Colorado government body violating the rights of the baker while simultaneously enforcing the notion that one can demand labor from another for any reason.

1. Slavery is illegal. I don't care how gay you are. You cannot demand anything from me that I don't wanna do.

2. The First Amendment is still a thing.
edit on 4 6 18 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee

It wasn't about the cake.

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.


It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.


Right. SCOTUS didn't rule that Colorado's law against discrimination of gay people trampled anyone's religious rights. The law still stands.


The law stands but now it has bounderies



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:42 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

Yeah, I was basically agreeing with you, and agree with your points. Sorry if that came off a different way.



posted on Jun, 4 2018 @ 12:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Annee

It wasn't about the cake.

MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v.
COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL.


It was about the fact that the Civil Rights Commission trampled on the first amendment rights of an individual to satisfy an unjust demand for labor.


Right. SCOTUS didn't rule that Colorado's law against discrimination of gay people trampled anyone's religious rights. The law still stands.


The law stands but now it has bounderies


Borders.

It has borders now.

💡🔐




top topics



 
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join