It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My point is maybe if we treat people as individuals and shuck off the narratives rather than reinforce them we can have discussions that are more real.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: luthier
My point is maybe if we treat people as individuals and shuck off the narratives rather than reinforce them we can have discussions that are more real.
Okay... gotcha.... I think... But it seems to me that's exactly what I was doing. I was responding to the comment of one poster who was unaware of anyone on the left calling for a complete gun ban. I gave examples of individuals on the left who had done exactly that. Whereas the comment I responded to addressed the group, I addressed individuals within that group.
In this case, these individuals have "shucked off" the party narrative. It's just as silly to ignore the "ban all guns" folks as it is to ignore the "allow all guns" folks. We cannot treat people as individuals and then ignore individuals when they express themselves.
You are giving a voice to a crazy radical viewpoint which is how these things perpetuate.
i've heard the argument that Liberals [now calling themselves Progressives] are against the public's ownership of guns for the sake of public safety - and the Second Ammendment's use of the words 'well armed militia' meant the mitlitary and police - Which unfortuanlely sounds to many like the call for a 'police state' - Is this what these so called progressives want?
...presenting this as an argument...
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Boadicea
I am sorry to present my replies the way I did. I guess I just want the country to heal and people to stop just trying to win at any cost. It probably made me seem hostile.
I also have children and the gun debate bothers me very deeply as it wages war on the public more people die. The false narratives are the biggest dog wagging in American history. We don't talk about gang violence, we don't talk about mental health, we don't talk about security in any depth or discussion. It just comes down to guns.
Well it doesn't and a party winning or losing doesn't ever seem to change the discussion.
Which unfortuanlely sounds to many like the call for a 'police state' - Is this what these so called progressives want?
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: AlienView
There's a simple reason there's little support for a Centerest party. And its the reason the Red states are Red.......those who today might be called Centerists are in fact more closely aligned with the Libertarian view point.
What does that really mean? It means they dont want to be ruled over or regulated by ANYONE OR ANY POLITICAL PARTY!
originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: Irishhaf
I don't see this as a major, needle moving issue. Yes, ppl have strong feelings about it, but I'm not sure it would be the over riding consideration for most. The leaders of the Democratic party are increasingly radical, to the point of socialism, that centrists/inds won't touch them.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: AlienView
I am going to honest here. I stopped watching news on the tube a few months back but I still make my rounds on the internet. I go to all news sites you can think of. I believe that reading all news sources is helpful to fully understand what is actually going on in the world.
With that being said I have never seen a article from a “left” leaning site that says we should take away guns. I personally believe that is a fabrication made to help further the divide between people. The only organizations that I have seen say that are those that believe that the left is evil.
I have seen articles from left leaning sites that say the AR-15 should be illegal. I think that is bull crap though. Now I may have missed some articles that say we should outlaw guns but if I did see that I just keep scrolling cause that is complete crap.