It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: karl 12
The usual narrative seems to be that benevolent
aliens are watching over us, and don't want us to
destroy ourselves. (and thus play with our nukes
to show us who is boss).
But there is no evidence for that.. none..
Kev
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: karl 12
The most believable "UFO" evidence of all, is those
tens of thousands of cored out cattle, elk, deer,
cats, dogs, badgers, seals, bison, and the dozens
of other species, including the mutilated humans.
Kev
MUFON Case #1,024 Gatcheville, Pennslyvannia, United States - March 8, 1977
Physical Trace Cases
Eleven (11) witnesses at various locations reported seeing a "red ball of fire" moving very slowly at very low level. Duration of sighting was 25 minutes. A ground fire was reported and an area 30 x 100 feet was found burnt. In this burnt area a triangular section was not burnt. The area measured 72"x 54"x 52". A hole was found at each point of the triangle.
Report from John Lutz to CUFOS
originally posted by: majickJimi
a reply to: one4all
I would have but one simple question: "Where is the geological evidence of the last event?"
originally posted by: majickJimi
a reply to: one4all
I would have but one simple question: "Where is the geological evidence of the last event?"
I think the multidimensional paraphysical explanation for U.F.O.'s is purely hypothetical.
I looked at that and I don't see any threat to national security other than the existence of the missiles themselves, this is the threat:
originally posted by: karl 12
when it comes to the claim that 'UFOs are of no defense significance' then how do they reason that incidents like this do not affect National Security- the mind boggles.
MinotUFO
A 1979 US government study [PDF] into the effects of a nuclear exchange estimated that 40 to 60 per cent of the world population would have been dead within 30 days, and the casualty rate could have been 90 per cent in the decade following a war. There would have been no internet, probably no power and – as this hack was living next to a target – no one writing this.
That should be obvious to everybody who knows anything about radar from looking at the radar recordings, that the radar didn't appear to be tracking an kind of solid object like a threatening aircraft.
There was a good correlation between the times of the radar sightings and visuals but radar sightings do not correlate well with visuals in reference to movement, quantity of objects involved and position of objects. This combined with the statement by the RAPCON console operator that he thought the paints were radar “ghosts’ indicated that the radar paints were indeed due to anomalous propagation.
originally posted by: one4all
originally posted by: majickJimi
a reply to: one4all
I would have but one simple question: "Where is the geological evidence of the last event?"
I like the question so much it deserves two answers......once upon a time I was an Oil Drilling Rig worker....working with most of the Oil fields/deposits being recovered in NA.....I have TASTED ABSOLUTELY FRESH OIL...….it doesn't taste bad to be frank.....I have been an EYE-WITNESS to pieces of interesting objects which have been brought up and run over our massive shale shakers...…..I have seen PURE GOLD AND GEMSTONES in our samples because I was a smart cookie and had a 50.00 microscope I bought at a garage sae then carried everywhere with me and hid in my Boiler-room so I could learn ahead of everyone else what the Geologists were finding and find ways to get ahead of the curve in our drilling programs or ways to make my own job easier to streamline my time better and be able to anticipate what we would be doing next as per the data being fed to the Geologists and Engineers.
The genetic mapping that has been done on the human geonone on a Global scale......has shown us exactly where the last groups of human survivors emanated from....a clear template which shows us with a 100% certainty that all groups alive today originated in uber-high altitude areas and then migrated down .....pal there are literally thousands of examples of the evidence of these cycles all around us if you know how to dentify and parse them properly.
What we have backing this theory/TRUTH are vidences of repeatable results on multiple Continents....the theoretical model experimentation produces REPEATABLE RESULTS when applied properly....when an experiment produces repeatable results it is no longer considered to be a theory.
The so-called Earth Changes...the Apcoolypse...Armageddon....The Rapture....The End of Days....The arrival of the Destroyer.....the passing of Nibiru.....Wormwood....Ziusudra....Gilgamesh...Noah....et al..........every Global Flood
story in history......these stories ALL DESCRIBE THIS.......................Global Continental Displacement and the proxy Global Continental Displacement Waves which rise up and over the Continents wiping them clean of life and limb....caused by the near-by passing of a massive body in space which transits between the Earth and Sun and exerts a massive pull on our Planet.
Disclaimer....this name has nothing to do with any past current or future member of ATS,there has been conversation on this topic with someone by this name and it has caused confusion and friction ,however to keep things clear it is simply a name that has caught my attention because of this online definition which IMHO applies directly to what I am doing to conventional wisdom and academia with this discovery and evidence....acronyms.thefreedictionary.com... ........very low anterior resection or in my more olde fashioned terms ....ripping them a new pie-hole......so to be EXACT and ON THE RECORD.....I call this action model the Vlar Global Continental Displacement Model and have named the proxy wave actions Vlar Global Continental Displacement Waves.Consider this to be as stated a VLAR/ VERY LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION....of past and current Academia lies and deceptions and mis-leading models....or in other words ripping them a new pie-hole.
originally posted by: majickJimi
originally posted by: one4all
originally posted by: majickJimi
a reply to: one4all
I would have but one simple question: "Where is the geological evidence of the last event?"
I like the question so much it deserves two answers......once upon a time I was an Oil Drilling Rig worker....working with most of the Oil fields/deposits being recovered in NA.....I have TASTED ABSOLUTELY FRESH OIL...….it doesn't taste bad to be frank.....I have been an EYE-WITNESS to pieces of interesting objects which have been brought up and run over our massive shale shakers...…..I have seen PURE GOLD AND GEMSTONES in our samples because I was a smart cookie and had a 50.00 microscope I bought at a garage sae then carried everywhere with me and hid in my Boiler-room so I could learn ahead of everyone else what the Geologists were finding and find ways to get ahead of the curve in our drilling programs or ways to make my own job easier to streamline my time better and be able to anticipate what we would be doing next as per the data being fed to the Geologists and Engineers.
The genetic mapping that has been done on the human geonone on a Global scale......has shown us exactly where the last groups of human survivors emanated from....a clear template which shows us with a 100% certainty that all groups alive today originated in uber-high altitude areas and then migrated down .....pal there are literally thousands of examples of the evidence of these cycles all around us if you know how to dentify and parse them properly.
What we have backing this theory/TRUTH are vidences of repeatable results on multiple Continents....the theoretical model experimentation produces REPEATABLE RESULTS when applied properly....when an experiment produces repeatable results it is no longer considered to be a theory.
The so-called Earth Changes...the Apcoolypse...Armageddon....The Rapture....The End of Days....The arrival of the Destroyer.....the passing of Nibiru.....Wormwood....Ziusudra....Gilgamesh...Noah....et al..........every Global Flood
story in history......these stories ALL DESCRIBE THIS.......................Global Continental Displacement and the proxy Global Continental Displacement Waves which rise up and over the Continents wiping them clean of life and limb....caused by the near-by passing of a massive body in space which transits between the Earth and Sun and exerts a massive pull on our Planet.
Disclaimer....this name has nothing to do with any past current or future member of ATS,there has been conversation on this topic with someone by this name and it has caused confusion and friction ,however to keep things clear it is simply a name that has caught my attention because of this online definition which IMHO applies directly to what I am doing to conventional wisdom and academia with this discovery and evidence....acronyms.thefreedictionary.com... ........very low anterior resection or in my more olde fashioned terms ....ripping them a new pie-hole......so to be EXACT and ON THE RECORD.....I call this action model the Vlar Global Continental Displacement Model and have named the proxy wave actions Vlar Global Continental Displacement Waves.Consider this to be as stated a VLAR/ VERY LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION....of past and current Academia lies and deceptions and mis-leading models....or in other words ripping them a new pie-hole.
Okay...So, I guess I should reiterate my question!
"Where is the geological evidence of the last event?"
You have not provided any evidence of your event, only what might be interpreted as "word-salad "
You speak of a theoretical model...where is it? Oh and by the way; a theory that produces consistantly repeatable experimental results is still only a theory until you can prove that there can be no other result or explaination. In science there are a plethora of theory, and very few actual "Laws"
originally posted by: majickJimi
a reply to: one4all
I would have but one simple question: "Where is the geological evidence of the last event?"
originally posted by: one4all
You are speaking to a regular person....not to a so-called academic....what the hades do YOU think I sould do ...write a Paper and submit it to some Major Universities.....LMAO.....I have already published outlines of this theory and its different models by posting them here on ATS....do your own groundwork man....lol....
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
I looked at that and I don't see any threat to national security other than the existence of the missiles themselves, this is the threat:
originally posted by: karl 12
when it comes to the claim that 'UFOs are of no defense significance' then how do they reason that incidents like this do not affect National Security- the mind boggles.
MinotUFO
originally posted by: majickJimi
originally posted by: one4all
You are speaking to a regular person....not to a so-called academic....what the hades do YOU think I sould do ...write a Paper and submit it to some Major Universities.....LMAO.....I have already published outlines of this theory and its different models by posting them here on ATS....do your own groundwork man....lol....
Well, I'm not an academic either. I'm just some old-a$$ed retired Engineer (electrical / software)…
So, what do I expect from you? Certainly NOT the publishing of your paper at some University; they probably wouldn't anyway. And I don't think you could survive the peer review process.
However, you could, and perhaps have?, publish a "White Paper" it is far less strenuous when it comes to "review". And, it appears that you have published something, or so you say. But, you could have the "professional" courtesy to include link when you mention your paper.
The point here is that it is customary to provide links, etc. to external data, papers, etc. that give some support to your hypothesis, and I think you should be honest with yourself and call your work to date a "hypothesis" as opposed to a theory, since you don't have a body of data to rely upon for confirmation (proof) of your ideas.
Anyway, man; we're done here.