It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Hecate666
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Grambler
Quick question.
Did any of those reporters have a suspended sentence with a condition saying they can’t report at court houses?
If the answer is no, then your thread is bull.
Didn't read any further because I had to say something. First of all, his suspended sentence was also unfair in the first place and secondly, they arrested him for this reason:
Breach of peace.
Not anything else, don't care what they say now [it has changed, which in itself is a farce]. The 'breach of peace' was totally made up on the spot because he literally was one guy walking around, speaking into a mobile phone with not many people around him [actually only a couple that walked by].
It wasn't for reporting on the trial, that's what they say now!!!!
I don't easily forget original news.
Of course any arrest will then be linked with his suspended sentence. They made up any old codswallop to arrest him and then send him down.
He was arrested for 'breach of peace', but didn't commit any. Then they said he can't do this because of his suspended sentence and without a jury and in 5 hours flat, he was sentenced to 13 months.
If you don't get it, I fear you don't read enough about the topics you comment on.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Grambler
The gary glitter nfootage is him on his way out of the court
see what you typed here.
The rolf harris footage was footage of him entering the court
Before the case had started.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Grambler
thesecretbarrister.com...
Explanation in here.
No its not!
I love this theme from you lot.
Post a link, say it answers everything, and then smugly claim anyone who doesnt agree doesnt know anything about english law.
Show me anywhere in that amatuer name calling screed that it remotely explains why there were allowed to be press outside the court during gary glitter and rolf harris's trial yelling questions at him.
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Grambler
thesecretbarrister.com...
Explanation in here.
No its not!
I love this theme from you lot.
Post a link, say it answers everything, and then smugly claim anyone who doesnt agree doesnt know anything about english law.
Show me anywhere in that amatuer name calling screed that it remotely explains why there were allowed to be press outside the court during gary glitter and rolf harris's trial yelling questions at him.
It states clearly that accurate and factual reporting is allowed outside of a court house, you obviously didn't read all of the link or you would no this. It was written by a Judge btw.
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Grambler
thesecretbarrister.com...
Explanation in here.
No its not!
I love this theme from you lot.
Post a link, say it answers everything, and then smugly claim anyone who doesnt agree doesnt know anything about english law.
Show me anywhere in that amatuer name calling screed that it remotely explains why there were allowed to be press outside the court during gary glitter and rolf harris's trial yelling questions at him.
It was written by a Judge btw.
details of Yaxley-Lennon’s situation that were inevitably flooded through social media by his knuckle-dragging cheerleaders, not least his racists-in-arms across the pond.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth
There is on certain types of cases!! You can support Robinson as much as you like but that still doesn't prove you right.
Victims of a wide range of sexual offences are given lifetime anonymity under the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992.
The 1992 Act imposes a lifetime ban on reporting any matter likely to identify the victim of a sexual offence, from the time that such an allegation has been made and continuing after a person has been charged with the offence and after conclusion of the trial. The prohibition imposed by s.1 applies to “any publication” and therefore includes traditional media as well as online media and individual users of social media websites, who have been prosecuted and convicted under this provision
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth
Victims of a wide range of sexual offences are given lifetime anonymity under the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992.
The 1992 Act imposes a lifetime ban on reporting any matter likely to identify the victim of a sexual offence, from the time that such an allegation has been made and continuing after a person has been charged with the offence and after conclusion of the trial. The prohibition imposed by s.1 applies to “any publication” and therefore includes traditional media as well as online media and individual users of social media websites, who have been prosecuted and convicted under this provision
From your link.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: UKTruth
Victims of a wide range of sexual offences are given lifetime anonymity under the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992.
The 1992 Act imposes a lifetime ban on reporting any matter likely to identify the victim of a sexual offence, from the time that such an allegation has been made and continuing after a person has been charged with the offence and after conclusion of the trial. The prohibition imposed by s.1 applies to “any publication” and therefore includes traditional media as well as online media and individual users of social media websites, who have been prosecuted and convicted under this provision
From your link.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: djz3ro
Tommy didn’t call your hero’s, the child rapists guilty
He merely reported on publicly available details and filmed, like all of the media did for the two trials I posted
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Grambler
thesecretbarrister.com...
Explanation in here.
No its not!
I love this theme from you lot.
Post a link, say it answers everything, and then smugly claim anyone who doesnt agree doesnt know anything about english law.
Show me anywhere in that amatuer name calling screed that it remotely explains why there were allowed to be press outside the court during gary glitter and rolf harris's trial yelling questions at him.
It was written by a Judge btw.
Oh and if a judge wrote the following
details of Yaxley-Lennon’s situation that were inevitably flooded through social media by his knuckle-dragging cheerleaders, not least his racists-in-arms across the pond.
then your system has far more problems with fair trials than a guy reporting outside the court steps.
What a biased immature scum bag to say that, and you think we should somehow lend legitimacy to this author because he is a judge?
Wow.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Grambler
Go read the link provided by UKTruth.