It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dozens of reporters film defendents outside of pedophile trials in UK; no arrests

page: 12
41
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 5 2018 @ 06:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

We know why he was arrested.
As for his first suspended sentence he was filming inside a court building, something he had been told by the court clerk previously that he was allowed to do. That is on video. So it's no surprise he challenged a later demand to stop filming.
When he was given the suspended sentence it was under section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act... the recommended fine for such action is 'not more than 50 pounds'. Real serious stuff right there. Robinson got a 3 month suspended jail sentence.

The most important part of all of this is the clamp down and cover up of reporting on rape gangs - and the undoubted targeting of an individual by the state (something which has been apparent for some time and long before this recent arrest). Crikey, the man has been attacked by a group of masked men in broad daylight with the police standing and watching it happen, and then mocking him when he asked why they didn't do anything.

I care more about the targeting, multi tiered policing and judicial system and stopping rape gangs than I do about a damn court photo.




posted on Jun, 5 2018 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Really, there is video of Robinson being told by a court official its OK to film inside the court building?



posted on Jun, 5 2018 @ 11:36 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

No its placing a gag order so people can get a fair trial.

As for the explanations you provided they are irrelevant in the argument for why he did what he did. The point is he failed to comply with a court order. His previous history suggests he has no regard for the law or the rights of other people.

The irony in your argument is you are trying to defend Robinson by making assumptions and excuses yet you have no problem denying the same to the accused who are on trial.

So do rights only exist when it is something you agree with while they are denied to those who are accused yet not convicted of a crime?

Do Robinson's rights somehow matter more than other peoples?
edit on 5-6-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2018 @ 10:47 AM
link   
I saw the video of Robinson and he was very far from any building. I also heard he researched how far he had to be legally and was as far as necessary. But maybe not, maybe despite there being police on site ready to hammer him, perhaps they let him inside the court with a camera crew and then after he started filming took him?



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 07:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Xenogears

On Tommy's livestream he listed names of innocent people who were not in fact defendants in the case. He also listed the crimes they were charged with, some of which the CPS had already dropped. For a fuller account of why he was arrested - see link. The real reasons for Tommy's arrest



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 07:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: UKTruth

Really, there is video of Robinson being told by a court official its OK to film inside the court building?



Yes and it's not hard to find.



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 08:07 AM
link   
a reply to: BenGee101

thanks for the link, some good details there as to why he was arrested



posted on Jun, 11 2018 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: UKTruth

Really, there is video of Robinson being told by a court official its OK to film inside the court building?



Yes and it's not hard to find.


Whose authority is greater?

The police providing security for the courthouse or the judge overseeing the trial everyone is present to see?




top topics



 
41
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join