It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Gowdy: FBI Acted Properly With Use of Informant

page: 14
36
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 06:35 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

But trump lies. And changes his mind on a dime.




posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 06:47 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Who trump? Sounds like you're describing him. Mueller on the other hand has a pretty #ing good reputation soooo.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 06:52 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Gowdy is running as fast and as far as he can from the current administration. I seriously doubt he's going to join them.
Congress has already told trump they won't approve another AG for his administration.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 07:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Who trump? Sounds like you're describing him. Mueller on the other hand has a pretty #ing good reputation soooo.


I hope all of Trump's supporters remember this when the time comes:

I hate memes, but they seem to be the only thing Trump supporters can read.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Ask your former marine about the 4 innocent people he helped put on death row.
Withholding evidence from the defense seems to be his modus operandi.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 09:06 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Sure.

That's why he was so successful at the FBI right?👌
edit on 612018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 10:01 AM
link   
www.nytimes.com...



BOSTON, July 26 — In what appears to be the largest sum of money ever awarded to people who were wrongfully convicted, a judge today ordered the federal government to pay $101.8 million to make amends for framing four men for a murder they did not commit. Two of the men died in prison after being falsely convicted in the 1965 gangland murder. Another, Peter Limone, spent 33 years in jail before he was exonerated in 2001. The fourth, Joseph Salvati, spent 29 years in prison. “It took 30 years to uncover this injustice,” Federal District Judge Nancy Gertner said in announcing her decision. She said the case was about “the framing of innocent men,” adding that “F.B.I. officials allowed their employees up the line to ruin lives.”




www.courthousenews.com...




As their clients awaits sentencing on a charge of lying to the FBI, a federal judge delivered some good news to attorneys for former national security adviser Michael Flynn. He order special counsel Robert Mueller to turn over any “exculpatory evidence” he has in the criminal case to the ex-Trump official’s defense team. In an order signed Friday, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said federal prosecutors must timely provide Flynn’s defense team with “any evidence in its possession that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment.”



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 10:24 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Who trump? Sounds like you're describing him. Mueller on the other hand has a pretty #ing good reputation soooo.


I hope all of Trump's supporters remember this when the time comes:

I hate memes, but they seem to be the only thing Trump supporters can read.


o u got pics


kinda odd that both pics are old and in the first they point out 5 highlights of a long career and in the other they stay focused on the time period the pic was taken in...



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 10:46 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

It is going to get much brighter and hotter.
Some will faint.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Gandalf77

Actually based on the questions released he will NOT sit down as the questions are designed.


Slow your roll.

It has already been all but confirmed that those were questions composed by Trump's legal team, not Mueller.

They were practice questions to see if Trump could tolerate the heat.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burgerbuddy

That is incorrect.

Perhaps you need to read about the Saturday Night Massacre, Nixon, his articles of impeachment, specifically article 1 section 4, and how his actions (pushing to fire a special prosecutor) became part of the impeachment charges.


nterfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees;


Trump has said he wont fire mueller or try to fire him so....there goes your theory on addin tthat to impeachment charges.


Weird post.

Trump has no legal authority to fire Mueller.

That is the whole premise of the Special Counsel.

Rosenstein can fire Mueller.
Sessions can fire Mueller if he un-recuses.
Trump can fire both Sessions and Rosenstein if they don't fire Mueller like he tells them to.
Whoever becomes Acting AG or Acting Deputy AG can fire Mueller.
But Trump can't fire Mueller.

It is like saying Trump assured people he would not flap his arms and fly.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: soberbacchus

Idictments of whom though? Since you have to unseat the president before he can be prosecuted for anything.


You don't seem to be following.

Did I say Trump was going to be indicted? Or just the opposite?



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 11:42 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

he probably still has that trophy.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

State prosecutions are not the responsibility of the Fed's and the story points out that they are not required to share info with state prosecutors.
And do I need to point out that these guys were mafia and no angels even if they didn't kill that particular person. Its not like they sent boy scouts to prison.
The Fed's were protecting a source and were going g after the mob. Much bigger fish. Those thugs were acceptable collateral damage.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burgerbuddy

That is incorrect.

Perhaps you need to read about the Saturday Night Massacre, Nixon, his articles of impeachment, specifically article 1 section 4, and how his actions (pushing to fire a special prosecutor) became part of the impeachment charges.


nterfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees;


Trump has said he wont fire mueller or try to fire him so....there goes your theory on addin tthat to impeachment charges.


Weird post.

Trump has no legal authority to fire Mueller.

That is the whole premise of the Special Counsel.

Rosenstein can fire Mueller.
Sessions can fire Mueller if he un-recuses.
Trump can fire both Sessions and Rosenstein if they don't fire Mueller like he tells them to.
Whoever becomes Acting AG or Acting Deputy AG can fire Mueller.
But Trump can't fire Mueller.

It is like saying Trump assured people he would not flap his arms and fly.


You are wrong.

Trump has all legal authority to fire anyone involved in a cointel op..

However if mueller was investigating trump then he could not fire him.

You choose is it a counter intel operation or is it an investigation of trump?

rock and hard place



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 12:17 PM
link   
Keep in mind that spy's and informants are usually employed in cointelops.

Spy's are not so common in criminal investigations. However snitches are. The folks labeled as spy's in this case were not snitching.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




Its not like they sent boy scouts to prison. The Fed's were protecting a source and were going g after the mob. Much bigger fish. Those thugs were acceptable collateral damage.

We are truly blessed the founders did not think like you do.
It is really scary what you people find politically acceptable.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burgerbuddy

That is incorrect.

Perhaps you need to read about the Saturday Night Massacre, Nixon, his articles of impeachment, specifically article 1 section 4, and how his actions (pushing to fire a special prosecutor) became part of the impeachment charges.


nterfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees;


Trump has said he wont fire mueller or try to fire him so....there goes your theory on addin tthat to impeachment charges.


Weird post.

Trump has no legal authority to fire Mueller.

That is the whole premise of the Special Counsel.

Rosenstein can fire Mueller.
Sessions can fire Mueller if he un-recuses.
Trump can fire both Sessions and Rosenstein if they don't fire Mueller like he tells them to.
Whoever becomes Acting AG or Acting Deputy AG can fire Mueller.
But Trump can't fire Mueller.

It is like saying Trump assured people he would not flap his arms and fly.


You are wrong.

Trump has all legal authority to fire anyone involved in a cointel op..

However if mueller was investigating trump then he could not fire him.

You choose is it a counter intel operation or is it an investigation of trump?

rock and hard place


That is dumb.

Answer is neither.

Hard to respond to posts that have no reality tether.



posted on Jun, 1 2018 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: howtonhawky

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burgerbuddy

That is incorrect.

Perhaps you need to read about the Saturday Night Massacre, Nixon, his articles of impeachment, specifically article 1 section 4, and how his actions (pushing to fire a special prosecutor) became part of the impeachment charges.


nterfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees;


Trump has said he wont fire mueller or try to fire him so....there goes your theory on addin tthat to impeachment charges.


Weird post.

Trump has no legal authority to fire Mueller.

That is the whole premise of the Special Counsel.

Rosenstein can fire Mueller.
Sessions can fire Mueller if he un-recuses.
Trump can fire both Sessions and Rosenstein if they don't fire Mueller like he tells them to.
Whoever becomes Acting AG or Acting Deputy AG can fire Mueller.
But Trump can't fire Mueller.

It is like saying Trump assured people he would not flap his arms and fly.


You are wrong.

Trump has all legal authority to fire anyone involved in a cointel op..

However if mueller was investigating trump then he could not fire him.

You choose is it a counter intel operation or is it an investigation of trump?

rock and hard place


That is dumb.

Answer is neither.

Hard to respond to posts that have no reality tether.

Gowdy is that you again?

Shillin like a villain

keep playin dumb cause it suits you



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join