It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Grambler
Says it all really, it's not like he was not warned.
Judges/sheriff don't screw around, that's just a fact or reality.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
I am somewhat disturbed by the support for this muppet. The man's a criminal who uses a fake name and who co-founded a failed political movement that is now composed of former football hooligans and other assorted trash.
Im disturbed by a community of people that have admitted thousands of children have been raped for decades, and that in many cases not only was the authorities turning a blind eye to this, but they were sanctioning the few authorities that spoke up, and treating the victims like guilty prostitutes, and yet have more animosity for a man speaking up about this than the rapists themselves.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
Contempt of Court - it’s about being at the court - at the trial - swaying jurors.
Jurors are told not to read news while they are in the midst of the trial so they aren’t swayed. But how do they deal with someone who is there, at the courthouse? They can’t avoid him, like they can avoid the internet.
OP’s thread is rubbish.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Grambler
Says it all really, it's not like he was not warned.
Judges/sheriff don't screw around, that's just a fact of reality.
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: Grambler
Very simplistic. While the number of registered members seems high we had 1600 members on in the last 24 hours. Of those I'd wager maybe 500 are UK members. Of those posting in that thread what? A little over a handful? The odds of them swaying a potential juror is extremely minimal.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: kaylaluv
What I find particularly ironic is, what the far right is all up in arms about what they claim is happening here, is what they have been wanting Trump to do all along: hold the media (CNN) accountable and put ‘em in jail if they put out derogatory stuff about Trump, as it affects his ability to do his job.
So, either you are for it are agin’ it. Which is it?
Well one, I am glad you are assuming people upset with this are "far right" I am not.
Secondly, not only do I not want reporters jailed for negative stories on trump, I have actually called him out for his rhetoric suggesting revoking press passes.
But as long as we are making broad generalizations, allow me to respond in kind.
I find it ironic is you people on the left that proclaim to be feminists that reserve your anger and hatred more for a man who wants to report on child rapes more than the actual child rapsits themselves.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: andy06shake
In addition, tommy received more than just his suspended sentence, and there is no justification for him recieving the additional sentence, as he did not declare the men guilty.
Again, I posted the law on the first post, you do not need to be present at a court case to potentially sway jurors. writings can do the same the law says.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Grambler
Oh brother. You need to calm down dude. Not all Muslims are child rapists. Islam is not a religion of pedophiles and rapists.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Grambler
Oh brother. You need to calm down dude. Not all Muslims are child rapists. Islam is not a religion of pedophiles and rapists.