It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump finally admits Russia interfered in the election

page: 2
18
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 27 2018 @ 07:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

But your fantasies are not what happened.





posted on May, 27 2018 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

Seeing. No one on these boards worships Obama, please show me a thread equating Obama to Moses or Cyrus the Great like we have seen with Trump.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 07:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Pretty sure this is just Trump gearing up for the possibility of Russian meddling being proven. He's got both Obama and Hillary in the Tweet so it's a guaranteed deflection tactic on his part, a pre-emptive deflection if you will.


It doesn't matter if Russia DID meddle and it's proven though. Remember the investigation must link Trump to that meddling, which he didn't do. How did Russia meddle? Facebook ads? Twitter?

They didn't need Trump's help for that, although they might have gotten more coverage using Trump's overt style of "twittering"


Sorry to disappoint, but the actual thing must tie Trump to teaming up with Russia for this joke of scam to work against him. They let that cat out of the bag long ago, and now it is up in a tree and they can't get it down again. So no amount of spin or twisting the issues are going to help anti-Trumpers at this point.


edit on 27-5-2018 by NoCorruptionAllowed because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 07:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Pretty sure this is just Trump gearing up for the possibility of Russian meddling being proven. He's got both Obama and Hillary in the Tweet so it's a guaranteed deflection tactic on his part, a pre-emptive deflection if you will.


Meddling was already addressed in Mueller's indictment of the 13 Russians. You know, the indictment where Mueller admits that it started back in 2014. The indictment where he also admitted that the Russians played both sides of the fence and spent time and money toward both Trump's and Hillary's campaigns.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 07:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Deetermined

So you're saying the media saw smoke and reported on the possible source of said smoke? They were at least half right yet people like to claim they're 100% liars.

I haven't really been keeping up with any of it other than the tidbits I read on here, but is there a link to an article where a mainstream media outlet has said that Trump absolutely and undoubtedly colluded with Russia? An article than leaves no room for any doubt that it is 100% fact that he conspired with Russia to be elected?
edit on 5/27/2018 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Deetermined

So you're saying the media saw smoke and reported on the possible source of said smoke? They were at least half right yet people like to claim they're 100% liars.


Well, Mueller's indictment appears to be backfiring at this point. One of the Russians he indicted bothered to show up for a court hearing asking for proof of what Mueller had. Then there was the little incident where one of the names of the organizations that was being indicted didn't appear to exist during Mueller's timeline. Last I heard, Mueller was asking to delay the hearing indefinitely.


edit on 27-5-2018 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seeker1963

Seeing. No one on these boards worships Obama, please show me a thread equating Obama to Moses or Cyrus the Great like we have seen with Trump.


Nice bait to throw people off topic.

Real clever.

🥁💥



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Wait wait wait... so you're telling me that I'M the one throwing the thread off-topic when I was simply responding to a poster that brought Obama into the thread for no other reason than to make it about him instead of Trump?

Riiiight... Trump is the topic, not Obama, so if anything my post was more on topic than the post I was replying to, a post that you are conveniently ignoring as being the first post to veer the discussion off-topic.
edit on 5/27/2018 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seeker1963

Seeing. No one on these boards worships Obama, please show me a thread equating Obama to Moses or Cyrus the Great like we have seen with Trump.


The topic might be about Trump but it was proven that Obama new about it and did nothing! Try applying some ruby red nail polish and some heels. You are so desperate to promote your political belief I am worried about people like you coming to power!

I am sure Hitler would applaud you????



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Cb bunchanumbers does...for one



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:28 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

What is my political belief? Tell me since you are so sure that it is bad and something that Hitler would applaud. What exactly is my political belief?


(post by seeker1963 removed for a manners violation)

posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Pretty sure this is just Trump gearing up for the possibility of Russian meddling being proven. He's got both Obama and Hillary in the Tweet so it's a guaranteed deflection tactic on his part, a pre-emptive deflection if you will.


I think that Russian collusion has been pretty much proven by now.

The problem with the narrative is that it was the DNC and the Obama administration...

So he's probably right, just not in the way you are thinking.




posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seeker1963

What is my political belief? Tell me since you are so sure that it is bad and something that Hitler would applaud. What exactly is my political belief?


Hitler would have been solidly behind how the DNC and how the previous administration worked. Hell, read Mein Kampf. Then look at the Democrat's talking points. Hint.. it's the same thing.

Of course, in this age he would have been rounding up and taking conservatives to camps...



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:46 PM
link   
I don't see the word meddling.

And he's not wrong, the Obama admin knew, so why didn't they do anything?

Don't you have bigger things to worry about in the UK?



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seeker1963

What is my political belief? Tell me since you are so sure that it is bad and something that Hitler would applaud. What exactly is my political belief?


Hitler would have been solidly behind how the DNC and how the previous administration worked. Hell, read Mein Kampf. Then look at the Democrat's talking points. Hint.. it's the same thing.

Of course, in this age he would have been rounding up and taking conservatives to camps...


Holy snip you went there? God forbid we educate the brainwashed ijits who claim to be educated?



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Pretty sure this is just Trump gearing up for the possibility of Russian meddling being proven. He's got both Obama and Hillary in the Tweet so it's a guaranteed deflection tactic on his part, a pre-emptive deflection if you will.


Russian meddling was never in doubt. What is, is Trump-Russia collusion. Still waiting on the tie that binds.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: seeker1963

What is my political belief? Tell me since you are so sure that it is bad and something that Hitler would applaud. What exactly is my political belief?


Hitler would have been solidly behind how the DNC and how the previous administration worked. Hell, read Mein Kampf. Then look at the Democrat's talking points. Hint.. it's the same thing.

Of course, in this age he would have been rounding up and taking conservatives to camps...


Holy snip you went there? God forbid we educate the brainwashed ijits who claim to be educated?


Holy snip back up your reply. What is actually different?

Read Mein Kampf and educate yourself.

It's easy, after all.. it's all online!



Edited to add... the only real problem they have had so far in furthering the agenda is all those pesky armed civilians. Care to point out to me the party that has a problem with armed civilians?
edit on 27-5-2018 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: PheonixReborn

Interference? Yes. Collusion? No.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 09:01 PM
link   

edit on 27-5-2018 by mekhanics because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
18
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join