It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Collusion? Porn Star Fiasco? Obstruction? Racist? Now Trump Is Accused Of Child Trafficking? WTF?

page: 4
27
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:15 PM
link   
Pretty low.

She stooped to the level of fox news/info wars. Reminiscent of Hannity, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, and Alex Jones style of slanderous reporting.

The crap of the right doesn't excuse the left doing it now, but people shouldn't be surprised that aforementioned styles are being mimicked now since there are successful models to follow.
edit on 27-5-2018 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle


$$$$$$$$$$$$ All about the money brother. Look at Harvey Weinstein yesterday who I am shocked it didn't hit the ATS boards. But he got freaking railed and turned himself in.


He had MONEY so he got released with an ankle bracelet!

Grant you innocent until proven guilty is a thing of the past, but FFS If you don't have a million dollars like Harvey you get locked the F up?


How is that freakin justice?????


edit on 27-5-2018 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Chadwickus

Oh But !!

CNN Says Trump cracking down on child sex trafficking is a conspiracy theory

you're busted.

🤦👋


You keep linking to articles that are just slightly different than what the actual subject is. Instead of linking to an article stating trump is running a child sex trafficking ring you link to an article about some people thinking trump is not cracking down on child sex trafficking enough?

Is this on purpose to mislead people who are unable to differenciate or are you just not bothering to read the articles you are using to somehow prove your false narratives? And why?



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: crtrvt

Here's a hint. If you click on the names showing the previous conversations to the post, you'll understand why it was posted.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

On opinion.

Opinion and Fair Comment Privileges
The right to speak guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution includes the right to voice opinions, criticize others, and comment on matters of public interest. It also protects the use of hyperbole and extreme statements when it is clear these are rhetorical ploys. Accordingly, you can safely state your opinion that others are inept, stupid, jerks, failures, etc. even though these statements might hurt the subject's feelings or diminish their reputations. Such terms represent what is called "pure opinions" because they can't be proven true or false. As a result, they cannot form the basis for a defamation claim.


Protected Speech

Over the years, the courts have clarified when and how speech can, and cannot, be restricted by the government.

For example, true threats and obscenity are not protected speech
On the other hand, provocative or offensive political opinions are protected speech
The government can only regulate protected speech in very specific instances, such as protecting public safety or national security


People need to realize that Op/Eds are protected speech and they can and often do contain deception and partisan crapola. They can pretty much say anything.

In the Senate also, there is a rule they can't be held accountable for any opinion they give on the Senate floor, so anything they say can be a lie at any time. I'm not sure about the House. I've only read about the Senate.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: underwerks

I think these children being over here in the first place is a bad thing. I'm in no position to say whether or not they would be "at risk" by being on a military base. I doubt that things are any better for these children in any other detention facility that we keep them in until we can figure out how to send them back to their home countries, which I hope, is what we are doing.

So do you agree with Obama and Trump?

Or do you think that taking children from their parents and holding them on military bases is a bad idea?


First of all, we don't know that anyone is taking children from their parents. Read my post above. It could be more hype from the left.

Secondly, I've already stated that I don't know how safe any of the detention facilities (including military bases) are that hold these children to begin with, so I don't have an opinion one way or the other on where they should be held.

It’s quite a conundrum when agreeing with Trump also means you’re agreeing with Obama, huh?

Strange that.


What's strange is the idea that you think I'm agreeing with either one of them when I've already stated twice that I have no opinion on the matter. I say send them home so they don't have to stay in a detention facility or military base!

I don’t expect you to agree with either of them. I expect you to try to weasel out of answering them because being critical of the government under Trump isn’t something a lot of people here are capable of.

I wasn’t disappointed.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen



@Hadas_Gold 4 hours ago
Deleted previous tweet because gave impression of recent photos (they’re from 2014)

Busted Xuen!
Oops.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: underwerks

I think these children being over here in the first place is a bad thing. I'm in no position to say whether or not they would be "at risk" by being on a military base. I doubt that things are any better for these children in any other detention facility that we keep them in until we can figure out how to send them back to their home countries, which I hope, is what we are doing.

So do you agree with Obama and Trump?

Or do you think that taking children from their parents and holding them on military bases is a bad idea?


First of all, we don't know that anyone is taking children from their parents. Read my post above. It could be more hype from the left.

Secondly, I've already stated that I don't know how safe any of the detention facilities (including military bases) are that hold these children to begin with, so I don't have an opinion one way or the other on where they should be held.

It’s quite a conundrum when agreeing with Trump also means you’re agreeing with Obama, huh?

Strange that.


What's strange is the idea that you think I'm agreeing with either one of them when I've already stated twice that I have no opinion on the matter. I say send them home so they don't have to stay in a detention facility or military base!

I don’t expect you to agree with either of them. I expect you to try to weasel out of answering them because being critical of the government under Trump isn’t something a lot of people here are capable of.

I wasn’t disappointed.


While I highly support Trump on his efforts to bring back law and order, I was very disappointed that he encouraged Congress to support DACA and a replacement health care plan for Obamacare, which isn't feasible. We shouldn't be encouraging more illegal children to come here and I believe that DACA would have done just that. We also should have repealed Obamacare without a replacement. Our government has proven that it is not capable of running any kind of health care program without fraud, waste, and abuse, not to mention the fact that we aren't even close to being able to financially support it.


edit on 27-5-2018 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
Pretty low.

She stooped to the level of fox news/info wars. Reminiscent of Hannity, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, and Alex Jones style of slanderous reporting.

The crap of the right doesn't excuse the left doing it now, but people shouldn't be surprised that aforementioned styles are being mimicked now since there are now successful models to follow.

I agree. The right throwing truth out the window for money and exposure shouldn’t be replicated by the people who are trying to fight against that.

It’s interesting to me the uproar this one article caused. When the same thing is done by right leaning “news” it’s just business as usual.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks


I agree. The right throwing truth out the window for money and exposure shouldn’t be replicated by the people who are trying to fight against that.


Do you mind sharing what truth was thrown out the window for money and exposure?



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: underwerks


I agree. The right throwing truth out the window for money and exposure shouldn’t be replicated by the people who are trying to fight against that.


Do you mind sharing what truth was thrown out the window for money and exposure?

All you have to do is go to the front pages of most right wing news sites. Or browse through ATS. But I’m sure you and others believe that spin on reality is actually reality.

So I don’t really expect you to acknowledge when something is untrue if it contradicts what Trump or the government under Trump says. So that’s a non starter.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: RowanBean
a reply to: xuenchen



@Hadas_Gold 4 hours ago
Deleted previous tweet because gave impression of recent photos (they’re from 2014)

Busted Xuen!
Oops.


LOL - thats the tweet that hyper-racists Linda Sarsour, Sean King and a CNN tard tweeted out this morning (all within 15 mins of each other) as a dog whistle to their low-info base that has come back to bite them in the ass - LOL, stupid libtards.




posted on May, 27 2018 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: underwerks


I agree. The right throwing truth out the window for money and exposure shouldn’t be replicated by the people who are trying to fight against that.


Do you mind sharing what truth was thrown out the window for money and exposure?

All you have to do is go to the front pages of most right wing news sites. Or browse through ATS. But I’m sure you and others believe that spin on reality is actually reality.

So I don’t really expect you to acknowledge when something is untrue if it contradicts what Trump or the government under Trump says. So that’s a non starter.


You're not able to pick just one?

When the Inspector General's report is released will you believe it? Michael Horowitz was appointed by Obama even though he filed an official grievance against Obama for not allowing him to do his job. Would you hold that against Horowitz's upcoming report?



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 06:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Journalists from left and right getting trolled and/or trolling their base is nothing new. You laugh at "libtards" and I laugh at "contards" for taking the bait. This thread is a very perfect example of that.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 06:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: RowanBean
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Journalists from left and right getting trolled and/or trolling their base is nothing new. You laugh at "libtards" and I laugh at "contards" for taking the bait. This thread is a very perfect example of that.


Yet you participate? roflmao



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: RowanBean

Censoring works !!

The trap was sprung.

😎🎁



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 06:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: RowanBean
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Journalists from left and right getting trolled and/or trolling their base is nothing new. You laugh at "libtards" and I laugh at "contards" for taking the bait. This thread is a very perfect example of that.


Yet you participate? roflmao

You and me both.



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: underwerks


I agree. The right throwing truth out the window for money and exposure shouldn’t be replicated by the people who are trying to fight against that.


Do you mind sharing what truth was thrown out the window for money and exposure?

All you have to do is go to the front pages of most right wing news sites. Or browse through ATS. But I’m sure you and others believe that spin on reality is actually reality.

So I don’t really expect you to acknowledge when something is untrue if it contradicts what Trump or the government under Trump says. So that’s a non starter.


You're not able to pick just one?


Steve Bannon. Who the president of the United States in his infinite 5D wisdom chose to take as an advisor.

Pretty much anything he’s written. Have fun reading up.




posted on May, 27 2018 @ 06:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: underwerks


I agree. The right throwing truth out the window for money and exposure shouldn’t be replicated by the people who are trying to fight against that.


Do you mind sharing what truth was thrown out the window for money and exposure?

All you have to do is go to the front pages of most right wing news sites. Or browse through ATS. But I’m sure you and others believe that spin on reality is actually reality.

So I don’t really expect you to acknowledge when something is untrue if it contradicts what Trump or the government under Trump says. So that’s a non starter.


You're not able to pick just one?


Steve Bannon. Who the president of the United States in his infinite 5D wisdom chose to take as an advisor.

Pretty much anything he’s written. Have fun reading up.



What has he written? Bannon doesn't even work at Breitbart any longer, so unless he has his own blog that I don't know about, I don't know what you're getting at.

Are you going to answer my question about whether or not you would believe the DOJ's Inspector General's report that's going to be released? I'm curious to see how you feel about that.


edit on 27-5-2018 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 06:11 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Heh, typical deflection/projection. I still believe John Podesta's use of FBI-compiled pedophile code words is suspicious. And this type of deflections/projection is a page out of their play book.



new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join