It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not my place to prove anything.
The Bible says...
originally posted by: TerryDon79
You see all those words?
Prove it.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
probably several ways to identify a creator.
originally posted by: Incandescent
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Yes. If those characters are sufficiently complex enough to understand such concepts.
Please do explain how these game characters - no matter their level of intelligence - could prove to other characters in the game that a programmer created them and their world. What would suffice as evidence?
1) the creator makes themselves known. This would be the easiest process of course.
2) the characters identify the code used, and are able to use that code to rewrite reality in ways that would otherwise be impossible. (Breaking the physics of the game.
I’ll try to think of some more. That was a pretty fun exercise.
originally posted by: WarriorMH
originally posted by: whereislogic
a reply to: WarriorMH
The elephant remains in the room no matter how many people stick their heads in the sand and embrace agnosticism or Pontius Pilate's way of thinking when he insincerely asked Jesus "What is truth?", demonstrating his disdainful attitude towards truth. An attitude that has been adopted by many nowadays, especially politicians and philosophers who like to be called scientists; who share a lot of other things in common as well.
Everything is subjective, this is your opinion only, ...
1. based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
1. accept or admit the existence or truth of.
Cogito, ergo sum; I think, therefore I am. - René Descartes (in my opinion an unreliable untrustworthy philosopher, but that phrase makes sense to me, but I also see the downside slogan-like attributes of it that could allow various people to interpret the phrase whichever way tickles their ears best)
originally posted by: DictionaryOfExcuses
I hate this place
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: cooperton
Blah blah blah.
Got any evidence for your sky daddy creator?
If I was going to make up a fake religion, one so absurd that I knew a lot of people wouldn’t believe it, I would definitely include that line somewhere within the scripture.
originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: TerryDon79
It's not my place to prove anything. The Bible says that God reveals himself to those he chooses. When or if he wants to reveal himself to you, He will.
originally posted by: Barcs
originally posted by: DictionaryOfExcuses
I hate this place
If you hate this one, you should go look at the other thread asking the same about evolution
I love the double standards creationists invoke to desperately defend an ancient belief system. This thread highlights them perfectly.
When creationists ask for evidence of evolution:
The evidence is provided and then is either ignored completely or excuses are made to not read it or falsely claim it doesn't count and to change the subject away from the evidence. It happens like clockwork here.
When skeptics ask for evidence of god / religion:
Evidence is not provided, merely subjective mythology quotes and presumptive assumptions. The claim that "the evidence is everywhere" despite it not being anywhere and being unable to give a specific example, and a myriad of other fallacious arguments are used, but not a single thing based on testable evidence or that can actually be verified in any way whatsoever.
So one side provides peer reviewed testable evidence and it's instantly dismissed over fairy tales. The other side provides zilch and won't even admit the faith is faith. This is what happens when we allow the psychological abuse of our young children by religionists. It closes off their minds to anything outside of their predefined box. They can't leave their comfort zone to critically think about anything because they are trapped in a prison of delusion.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Barcs
originally posted by: DictionaryOfExcuses
I hate this place
If you hate this one, you should go look at the other thread asking the same about evolution
I love the double standards creationists invoke to desperately defend an ancient belief system. This thread highlights them perfectly.
When creationists ask for evidence of evolution:
The evidence is provided and then is either ignored completely or excuses are made to not read it or falsely claim it doesn't count and to change the subject away from the evidence. It happens like clockwork here.
When skeptics ask for evidence of god / religion:
Evidence is not provided, merely subjective mythology quotes and presumptive assumptions. The claim that "the evidence is everywhere" despite it not being anywhere and being unable to give a specific example, and a myriad of other fallacious arguments are used, but not a single thing based on testable evidence or that can actually be verified in any way whatsoever.
So one side provides peer reviewed testable evidence and it's instantly dismissed over fairy tales. The other side provides zilch and won't even admit the faith is faith. This is what happens when we allow the psychological abuse of our young children by religionists. It closes off their minds to anything outside of their predefined box. They can't leave their comfort zone to critically think about anything because they are trapped in a prison of delusion.
I could point out that there is no end-to-end evidence for the entire process of evolution as formulated in the MES and demand that you present that, before I will accept it, but if that were the case it would be particularly stupid of me, wouldn't it?
You exist in a universe of existence, are asking big questions about existence and the evidence is all around you. What more could be offered?
Even if there was a flashing neon sign brighter than 100 suns, you'd probably still ask for evidence.
The evidence is there and it is voluminous at a universal scale.
Science, on the other hand, has no evidence for the ultimate origins of everything. Consider the old "stuff from quantum fluctuation" BS. Try and derive a non-zero answer from Schrödinger's equation with inputs of zero. You can't. To further extend the 'quantum fluctuation' bit to say it produced a singularity (ignoring Pauli exclusion) is just so unphysical and unscientific I'm surprised that so few people point out how stupid and mythological it is.
If I'm wrong, show me the evidence. I'm pretty sure you have none, you just have convinced yourself that a 'sciency' sounding mythology is acceptable as evidence but other hard objective and rational evidence isn't.
There is a saying about the elephant in the room...
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: TerryDon79
Hilarious, 24 pages in and still nothing from the creationists aside from speculation, philosophical argument, and faith.
Hell of a lot more evidence to support the theory of evolution than 'God did it' lol, but I keep an open mind so if any creationists have something new to show the class, please do.
...I won't hold my breath though.
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Barcs
originally posted by: DictionaryOfExcuses
I hate this place
If you hate this one, you should go look at the other thread asking the same about evolution
I love the double standards creationists invoke to desperately defend an ancient belief system. This thread highlights them perfectly.
When creationists ask for evidence of evolution:
The evidence is provided and then is either ignored completely or excuses are made to not read it or falsely claim it doesn't count and to change the subject away from the evidence. It happens like clockwork here.
When skeptics ask for evidence of god / religion:
Evidence is not provided, merely subjective mythology quotes and presumptive assumptions. The claim that "the evidence is everywhere" despite it not being anywhere and being unable to give a specific example, and a myriad of other fallacious arguments are used, but not a single thing based on testable evidence or that can actually be verified in any way whatsoever.
So one side provides peer reviewed testable evidence and it's instantly dismissed over fairy tales. The other side provides zilch and won't even admit the faith is faith. This is what happens when we allow the psychological abuse of our young children by religionists. It closes off their minds to anything outside of their predefined box. They can't leave their comfort zone to critically think about anything because they are trapped in a prison of delusion.
I could point out that there is no end-to-end evidence for the entire process of evolution as formulated in the MES and demand that you present that, before I will accept it, but if that were the case it would be particularly stupid of me, wouldn't it?
You exist in a universe of existence, are asking big questions about existence and the evidence is all around you. What more could be offered?
Even if there was a flashing neon sign brighter than 100 suns, you'd probably still ask for evidence.
The evidence is there and it is voluminous at a universal scale.
Science, on the other hand, has no evidence for the ultimate origins of everything. Consider the old "stuff from quantum fluctuation" BS. Try and derive a non-zero answer from Schrödinger's equation with inputs of zero. You can't. To further extend the 'quantum fluctuation' bit to say it produced a singularity (ignoring Pauli exclusion) is just so unphysical and unscientific I'm surprised that so few people point out how stupid and mythological it is.
If I'm wrong, show me the evidence. I'm pretty sure you have none, you just have convinced yourself that a 'sciency' sounding mythology is acceptable as evidence but other hard objective and rational evidence isn't.
There is a saying about the elephant in the room...
LMAO!
You have no verifiable evidence, just speculation and philosophical argument.
It's hilarious, the OP is asking for your evidence, start yourown thread if you have your own questions fella.