Adam Schiff says its LieGate not SpyGate

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Sure that's what there doing.
Or as I like to call it... Crickets. Reep reep reep reep.

I said it once and I'll say it again. These names are dumb. Putting gate at the end of every scandal is dumb. What's worse is we cherry pick which scandals we put gate on the end of. They don't all get gates. LOL I say if we decide this is the way we wanna go, then we need to put gate on the end of every scandal.

MorganFreemangate, Cosbygate, Russiagate, Lewinskigate, Benghazigate, IRSgate, Birthergate, AffordableCaregate, grabembythegate, Stormygate, Christiebeachgate, georgezimmermangate, JFKgate, CIAcreatesAlQuedatofightrussiansthentheydo911onusgate,

I really like this.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Of course that means they have nothing or they'd be booking lots of three for all of the Friday night shows . KellyAnne, Giuilani, Scaramucci. On Tucker Carlson, and Ingram and Hannity.
They would have been on Fox and Friends this morning. Trump would have been tweeting...well he still is but he has no backers lol.

a reply to: six67seven

Wow you just wasted a lot of bandwidth.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Schiff getting so desperate he's resorting to poetry !!

responding to a TrumpTweet...

Adam Schiff
‏Verified account @RepAdamSchiff

Adam Schiff Retweeted Donald J. Trump

It is one thing to imagine a fictional world. It is another to repeatedly assert that something imagined is real. The first is the realm of the novelist. The second is that of a demagogue.

😀

Just cuz...

originally posted by: UKTruth
Ah well, Adam Schifty says so, so it must be true.

Agree that he sounds like a worried man.

We couldn't say how the right sounds cuz they haven't said a peep.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Yeah I'm have trouble believing people can be lied to over and over and still get for more.

Meanwhile back at the ranch there's was tet another meeting at trump tower to arrange more pay for play opportunities for trump. so let's play Russian roulette with the North Koreans because I don't like the headlines.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Aw my biggest fan has shown up to the party.
Yeah girl that's what I'm doin.
Of course there's no word in English for the show you guys are putting on.

This was another notch on the obstruction of justice belt Mueller is wearing.
Just more establishing a pattern that Mueller can point out.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Irishhaf

Of course that means they have nothing or they'd be booking lots of three for all of the Friday night shows . KellyAnne, Giuilani, Scaramucci. On Tucker Carlson, and Ingram and Hannity.
They would have been on Fox and Friends this morning. Trump would have been tweeting...well he still is but he has no backers lol.

So again.. all you have opinion got anything resembling evidence... proof of your opinion cause your opinion is no more valid than mine or anyone else at this point.

Yet you keep claiming what you say is fact, with out a single solitary piece of evidence to back you up.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Bull. They have proof and Democrats are admitting it and changing the definition of "a spy" and saying they were targeting Russians !!

Even Comey has admitted it.

Sun.✴️.Burn 🔑=🔓.open

a reply to: amazing

Conspire.a.gate

😁

a reply to: Sillyolme

Adam is sooo poetic isn't he.

🎁✍

Remember what Chuchy said .....
back in Jan 2017 before the Inauguration !!!

The SOB knew about the "Spy-gating" !!!

Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you'

🔑=🔓=🎁

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: amazing

Conspire.a.gate

😁

You get it!!!!

a reply to: xuenchen

There weren't any FBI agents involved. There was one informant who worked for them. But was not an agent.
But like trump don't let facts get in your way.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

There weren't any FBI agents involved. There was one informant who worked for them. But was not an agent.
But like trump don't let facts get in your way.

Who cares what you believe? What you believe or don't believe has no bearing on any of this.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

There weren't any FBI agents involved. There was one informant who worked for them. But was not an agent.
But like trump don't let facts get in your way.

So that must mean the "informant" reported to nobody right? 😀

They had 5 active agents inside the Campaign and dozens of DNC operators.

And still the Democrats claim they were hacked by Russians !! 😁

Loosers and Boozers = Fail ✴️

a reply to: Sillyolme

Or...

Snappy Crackly Pop

😎

Sorry for your loss Adam !!

50 U.S. Code § 1802

a reply to: xuenchen

You said that not me.
I'm sure the informant reported to the FBI.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Ok I give.
What have you got?
What shows you that there was important condemning information in that documentation they reviewed Thursday.