Evidence Russia Tipped Election For Trump Staggering Says James Clapper

originally posted by: proximo


Come on really, this crap again.

How did Russia influence squat ...

They didnt in the way Clapper is lying about.

Clapper: No Evidence Russians Changed Votes in Presidential Election, But They Tried to Interfere With Propaganda

Testifying in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday morning, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper made it clear Russian hacking didn't change the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

"They did not change any vote tallies or anything of that sort," Clapper stated.

So I ask again for those who are desperate to undo the election Hildbeast lost..

Was Clapper lying then or is he lying now.

a reply to: DupontDeux

Think about what you wrote for a moment.
The airways and social media was full of political ads for months.

Why do you think that was?

Because political ads aren't effective?
Did everybody waste their money because advertising doesn't work?

a reply to: Xcathdra

Was Clapper lying then or is he lying now.

If he is speaking there is a good chance it is not true.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: proximo


Come on really, this crap again.

How did Russia influence squat ...

They didnt in the way Clapper is lying about.

Clapper: No Evidence Russians Changed Votes in Presidential Election, But They Tried to Interfere With Propaganda

Testifying in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday morning, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper made it clear Russian hacking didn't change the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

"They did not change any vote tallies or anything of that sort," Clapper stated.

So I ask again for those who are desperate to undo the election Hildbeast lost..

Was Clapper lying then or is he lying now.

LOL!

It's like they forget that these things happened...or just ignore them.

Didn't they try to change it to the Chinese were behind it at some point too?

a reply to: Rewey

What is foolish is this constant claim that advertising is ineffective. Someone better notify Madison ave because there are a few hundred thousand people making a living depending on just the opposite.

You guys really don't think these things through do you?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Because political ads aren't effective?
Did everybody waste their money because advertising doesn't work?

and

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Rewey

What is foolish is this constant claim that advertising is ineffective. Someone better notify Madison ave because there are a few hundred thousand people making a living depending on just the opposite.

You guys really don't think these things through do you?

Well, Clinton wasted 1.2 billion on her election and used the dossier and lost so you tell us.

This guy is a serious liar.

Just for laughs you should google his name with liar and see for yourself.

a reply to: Sillyolme
Oh really....

Think about what you wrote for a moment.

unintentionally funniest line of the thread
keep them coming
www.washingtonpost.com... f-his-campaign/?utm_term=.39c0231c884c

“The ad spending from the Russian outfit was dwarfed by overall spending,” reported the New York Post. Reuters offered a comparison: “More than $1 billion was spent on political ads during the 2016 presidential campaign, thousands of times more than the presumed Russian spending identified by Facebook's security team.”

The Washington Post's Carol D. Leonnig, Tom Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman, who broke the story on Wednesday, pointed out that “the ad spending from Russia is tiny relative to overall campaign costs.” Talking Points Memo noted that “the amount of money involved is minuscule by any campaign standard,” and the Associated Press explained that “the number of ads is relatively small.”

again...

Think about what you wrote for a moment.

too good

a reply to: Sillyolme

originally posted by: Sillyolme
You guys really don't think these things through do you?

Right. I see you have thought this through as well.

So when can we expect the Great American Firewall to rival the one the Chinese have and to protect us from evil FAKE Russian news? Oh wait....thinking it through....what about domestic fake news? Check. We'll just have our inteigence agencies completely control the internet and decide what is safe for us to see.

Thinking it through...

a reply to: kurthall

Don't pay any attention to that one. All they do is call people names or say things like they feel sorry for you but have never actually offered anything of substance.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: kurthall

Don't pay any attention to that one. All they do is call people names or say things like they feel sorry for you but have never actually offered anything of substance.

Clapper: No Evidence Russians Changed Votes in Presidential Election, But They Tried to Interfere With Propaganda

Testifying in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday morning, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper made it clear Russian hacking didn't change the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

"They did not change any vote tallies or anything of that sort," Clapper stated.

Was Clapper lying then or is he lying now?

a reply to: kurthall

A-Okay.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: kurthall

Don't pay any attention to that one. All they do is call people names or say things like they feel sorry for you but have never actually offered anything of substance.

Yes please ignore everything Silly says . Agreeing with her makes you look like you ride the short bus..

a reply to: kurthall

That moment when you realize that you wrote something so stupid that even people who don't like Trump are against it.

Priceless!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

a reply to: shooterbrody

Madison avenue who have made their living in advertising for decades. But don't let anything like history or facts get in your way.

a reply to: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Xcathdra

Was Clapper lying then or is he lying now?

Actually, neither time.

You have to accept what Clapper is now saying is that even though not a single vote was physically or electronically tampered with, your vote is nonetheless illegitimate if you happen to agree with something he doesn't agree with.

Think about that for a moment. I think that is a terrifying position to hold.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Trump is the liar here.
Trump who has waged an all out war to discredit everyone who came before him.
Because he can never hope to measure up so taking them down fixes his ego issue.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Xcathdra

Was Clapper lying then or is he lying now?

Actually, neither time.

You have to accept what Clapper is now saying is that even though not a single vote was physically or electronically tampered with, your vote is nonetheless illegitimate if you happen to agree with something he doesn't agree with.

Think about that for a moment. I think that is a terrifying position to hold.

Lol my concern is certain people not being able to understand that. Even better is the absolute difference of opinion on why Clinton lost. Clapper says one thing and Clinton blames 15 other things.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

Trump is the liar here.
Trump who has waged an all out war to discredit everyone who came before him.
Because he can never hope to measure up so taking them down fixes his ego issue.

Your ego is so much bigger...

In October 2016 Obama told Trump to STOP WHINING about the upcoming election being rigged. It can't happen.
www.nytimes.com...