It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump too lazy to practice cellular security

page: 2
8
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 21 2018 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: Lumenari


It's to point out the utter hypocrisy of the left.





if you say so
i see it differently


Of course you do.

Doesn't mean it is correct... far from it.

But that's how you see things.

An opinion from someone of the Cancer party... the party that wants to take so much from the host that it kills it... then won't understand why it died.

A part of me sometimes hopes that you and your ideology get their perfect fantasy Utopia going, so we can let it crash and get on with rebuilding... that way it could leave a cultural memory that would never let progressives get into power again.

You have to learn somehow, after all. Those life lessons.





posted on May, 21 2018 @ 07:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
a reply to: Lumenari

So are you saying you have a problem with Trump doing this, or you now don't have a problem with Hillary doing it? Don't be a hypocrite yourself.

As for me, I didn't have a problem with Hillary and her server, and I don't have a problem with Trump and his phones....see how easy it is not to be a hypocrite.


So point out the law Trump broke and the law Hillary broke.

See how easy this is?

You probably don't.

You're not being a hypocrite... you are just being willfully ignorant.


edit on 21-5-2018 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 07:46 PM
link   
Good thing his 10 year old son is really good at the cyber.


edit on 21-5-2018 by SKEPTEK because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:04 PM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

I have to ask this question.
Do you even know why a Blackberry phone was used in the past?



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

So you go at the facetious comment that does have relevancy due to the source, and ignore the most pertainent comment of it being for only that purpose?



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:06 PM
link   
a reply to: SKEPTEK

Cute video.... didn’t explain anything though and probably took maybe 10 min to make.



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: SKEPTEK

Cute video.... didn’t explain anything though and probably took maybe 10 min to make.



To think that the most powerful man in the free world doesn't have cellular security is completely idiotic.

I don't think it deserves any more of a response than that.



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: roadgravel

There is no evidence the Clinton server was ever hacked. There is no question the State Department non-classified server that she was supposed to use was infiltrated. Twice actually.

Remember when Trump says her server was hacked, he is lying. Was it probed? No question about it. Anything connected to the internet gets probed.



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Allaroundyou

The NSA set up a special Blackberry for Obama. At the time, nothing else was as secure out of the box, let alone souped up. If you had a government cell phone, it was generally a Blackberry with the camera removed.

What was really funny back in the day was seeing Eric Schmidt using a Blackberry. It was so strange that people photographed him using one.



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: roadgravel

There is no evidence the Clinton server was ever hacked. There is no question the State Department non-classified server that she was supposed to use was infiltrated. Twice actually.

Remember when Trump says her server was hacked, he is lying. Was it probed? No question about it. Anything connected to the internet gets probed.


No evidence it was hacked, but the probability is 99.9%.

Government unclassified servers are not behind encryption and are subject to infiltration like any other unclassified server, although steps are taken to prevent this.

That really has nothing to do with putting classified information on an unclassified network.


If you had ever been involved in any type of IT security work....you would understand how easy it would have been for just about anyone with some hacking knowledge to access her server.
edit on R372018-05-21T20:37:22-05:00k375Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
5 posts and already we have the but obama and but hillary people



hilarious


And worse . Ignorance showing it's pitiful self...

edit on 5/21/18 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: roadgravel

There is no evidence the Clinton server was ever hacked. There is no question the State Department non-classified server that she was supposed to use was infiltrated. Twice actually.

Remember when Trump says her server was hacked, he is lying. Was it probed? No question about it. Anything connected to the internet gets probed.


No evidence it was hacked, but the probability is 99.9%.

Government unclassified servers are not behind encryption and are subject to infiltration like any other unclassified server, although steps are taken to prevent this.

That really has nothing to do with putting classified information on an unclassified network.


If you had ever been involved in any type of IT security work....you would understand how easy it would have been for just about anyone with some hacking knowledge to access her server.


It also means that there was no guarantee that secure offsite archived backups were regularly scheduled and run. No OpSec oversight of that server at all. Those that have no awareness of what that means, and the actual penalties for violating that are the ones calling this a nothing-burger.



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: roadgravel

There is no evidence the Clinton server was ever hacked. There is no question the State Department non-classified server that she was supposed to use was infiltrated. Twice actually.

Remember when Trump says her server was hacked, he is lying. Was it probed? No question about it. Anything connected to the internet gets probed.


It was in reference to her phones, which seemed to be a big deal in the past.



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 08:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

the most clever.
his IQ is like 6,000



www.newsweek.com...


Great to have our incredible First Lady back home in the White House. Melanie is feeling and doing really well. Thank you for all of your prayers and best wishes!”


covfefe for life!!!!!


So who misspelled the Wife's name? You or the husband?



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

As long as he's not re-using his twitter password, I don't see an issue if it's compromised. Now if there's credential re-use, or if someone in the government ever lets him plug it in to a computer to charge, well...



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 09:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
5 posts and already we have the but obama and but hillary people



hilarious



Agreed.

He should take the matter seriously as a point of leadership.



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: SKEPTEK

Fair enough



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 10:14 PM
link   
a reply to: gariac

why would you use a secure device for the twatter?

that would be a foolish idea and open you to more risk as you are connecting your device to an unsecure site . You might as well use it as a burner cell and throw it away as it could be compromised.

You use secure devices over secure lines to other secure sites or devices not public sites.

I'm pretty certain he uses the secure devices for certain national security discussions , or cnn would be all over it 24/7.

its almost like they are baiting him to get him to use his secure device in an unsecure site to infiltrate it.


edit on 21531America/ChicagoMon, 21 May 2018 22:21:24 -0500000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 10:21 PM
link   


why would you use a secure device for the twatter?

that would be a foolish idea andopen you to more risk as you are connecting your device to an unsecure site


It's the purpose of having a more secure device. So the less secure the device, the less risk?
edit on 5/21/2018 by roadgravel because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2018 @ 10:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: gariac
a reply to: roadgravel

There is no evidence the Clinton server was ever hacked. There is no question the State Department non-classified server that she was supposed to use was infiltrated. Twice actually.

Remember when Trump says her server was hacked, he is lying. Was it probed? No question about it. Anything connected to the internet gets probed.





Yeah , Your Right . No Evidence , Unless you ask these Russian Ladies...........






new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join