It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
they are illegal already for children to have , w out being under the observation of an adult.......
How does that work out for you??
Again my meme comes into play.......
No he didnt use a car..........but he DID have and USE bombs, he just didnt set them off because he didnt have a chance.......
Had he no other option he would have blown the whole school up.........
Thats not an avocation for gun violence BTW because I know thats how people like you will spin it.......what it is , is an example as he was going to do this WITH or WITHOUT guns.....
Guns are not the problem.........period........this whole case poitns that out.....even the interview with him........but hey you guys wont acknowledge that because it doesnt push the narrative......
but keep it up.....youre just proving our point, with every single mass shooting involved and kids that die, that you guys refuse to fortify the schools and do what SHOULD be done.......because "only removing guns are the answer" you prove it.........
Its not the kids you care about.......its the guns....
and I can list at least 5 devices right now that cost 100 or less that, TOMORROW, could be installed within 10 min or less that are permanent, and some within SECONDS of hearing of a shooting....... would block entry to an assailant.........but nooooooo........we dont want to mandate that do we........
because its a false narrative......its not about the kids......its about the agenda......
This crap makes me sick
I live in Boise Idaho, one of the most consistently top rated safest cities and STATES to live.........we have open carry.....
If you are 18 and not a felon or mental condition, you can own , and carry a firearm, concealed or open , without a permit.....
We also have one of the densest populations per capita for firearms .........so tell me.......if guns are the issue....
WHERE ARE OUR MASS SHOOTINGS.......again the evidence does NOT bear out the political bs.........
You really should face it straight up. No amount of twisting words are going to help you take away guns from law abiding US citizens.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: whywhynot
You really should face it straight up. No amount of twisting words are going to help you take away guns from law abiding US citizens.
No-one wants take guns away from law abiding citizens. That is just NRA fear mongering. The goal is to make it harder for criminals and other dangerous individuals to get access to them. The NRA, for all its talk, has no interest in doing that because criminals and psychopaths are the gun industry's best customers.
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: whywhynot
You really should face it straight up. No amount of twisting words are going to help you take away guns from law abiding US citizens.
No-one wants take guns away from law abiding citizens. That is just NRA fear mongering. The goal is to make it harder for criminals and other dangerous individuals to get access to them. The NRA, for all its talk, has no interest in doing that because criminals and psychopaths are the gun industry's best customers.
That is an old worn line that isn’t believed anymore if ever at all. Look how gunsales increased during Obummers reign.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: whywhynot
You really should face it straight up. No amount of twisting words are going to help you take away guns from law abiding US citizens.
No-one wants take guns away from law abiding citizens. That is just NRA fear mongering. The goal is to make it harder for criminals and other dangerous individuals to get access to them. The NRA, for all its talk, has no interest in doing that because criminals and psychopaths are the gun industry's best customers.
That is an old worn line that isn’t believed anymore if ever at all. Look how gunsales increased during Obummers reign.
Yes, the NRA has you wrapped around its finger. You actually believe "they" are literally coming to take your guns away. The NRA exists to drive gun sales, not defend your rights.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: network dude
But he didn't use a van. He used his father's guns.
And as I said, if he couldn't have gotten them, would he have gave up? I don't know, but since he went ahead and killed his classmates, it stands to reason that he was resolved in his decision. Why did he feel like this was the right choice? Was it because guns existed? Because his dad had guns? Or were the guns just the thing he used to direct his anger?
No he would have just set off the pipe-bombs and pressure cooker bombs he had set up all over the school and possibly killed many many more.......
I suppose then they would want to restrict access to fertilizer and plumbing equipment
But everyone pushing this gun control agenda are CONVENIENTLY leaving out the fact he had bombs too......because it doesnt forward the narrative....
The same as arming teachers or armed guards every 75 feet is a stupid narrative. Unless you secure a perimeter and you know exactly what enters the building as best as possible like a courthouse neither banning guns or arming staff is going to stop it.
I agree we secure court houses businesses but leave schools with limited security. Schools should have fence around campus and people should have to go through security just the same as we do in court houses. Me personally I think kids are much more important to protect them some judge.