It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trans woman wants 50K because Muslim woman refuses to wax xir's testicles.

page: 4
61
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2018 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: Xtrozero

You sound experienced..

Do the nuts go on holiday? Because I imagine if they're home it'll only make matters worse. Thin skin and all that.


Put your ball sack in place of his chest




posted on May, 16 2018 @ 05:38 PM
link   
If you got 50 grand I have a candle.
Your place or mine?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 05:44 PM
link   
Not too surprising at this point.

Lesbians are apparently bigots now, if they refuse to give oral stimulation to a "woman" with her male parts still.

*eyeroll*



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 05:50 PM
link   
I don’t believe this trans person has a valid discrimination case. Discrimination is based on refusing to provide the same product or service that you provide to everyone else. Since they don’t provide those services to anyone with male genitalia, this is not discrimination.

Now, if they offered the service to cis-gendered males but refused trans people with male genitalia, then that would be discrimination.

Same thing with making a cake. If your bakery sells white wedding cakes, and a gay couple wants a white wedding cake, it’s discrimination if you refuse to sell it to them because they’re gay. If your bakery will not ever decorate a penis on a cake, then it’s not discrimination if you refuse to do that for a gay person.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: NorthernLites

You ask a good question. There was a bakery that refused to bake a cake for a gay couple. I think this was a mistake, as it is discriminatory.

However, in this instance, I do find it reasonable that the spa with only female employees does not provide waxing services to male body parts. So my opinion on the two situations is different.

As the poster above me noted, the policy is to not wax penises. So this applies to everyone, even transgenders, equally.

I find it reasonable for females to not want to touch a penis. I find it unreasonable for someone to deny service to a gay couple when all they would have to do is bake a cake for them. To me, they are two very different things.
edit on 16pmWed, 16 May 2018 17:52:37 -0500kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)

edit on 16pmWed, 16 May 2018 17:53:28 -0500kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 05:56 PM
link   
I think in reality, it is a male penis on a female body. It hasn't been removed yet. When it is replaced by a vulva then she can go get a wax, sure.
edit on 16pmWed, 16 May 2018 17:56:59 -0500kbpmkAmerica/Chicago by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: NorthernLites


Isn't that painful? Easier to shave the balls. No?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:14 PM
link   

edit on 16-5-2018 by SeaWorthy because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: kaylaluv



cis-gendered


Is that lib-speak for normal?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:18 PM
link   
Private business.

As with the cake, business owner sells her services to whom ever she wishes.

If her employees are uncomfortable dealing with male genitalia, that's all she needs say.

Someone saw an easy payday. Why not, instead, google a place that caters to male genitalia?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: kaylaluv



cis-gendered


Is that lib-speak for normal?


“Normal” is bigot-speak for cis-gendered.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: NorthernLites
A "woman" is suing to have "her" testicles waxed. What a time to be alive!



The owner of a local waxing spa is mounting a public campaign to clear the name of his business after he was served a human rights complaint for denying service to a transgender woman.

Jason Carruthers, the president of Mad Wax on Walker Road, said he was surprised at the legal move since he had explained to the complainant that the spa did not offer Brazilian wax services on male body parts. “I have no male wax staff,” Carruthers said Friday. “We are not able to provide that service.”

A local transgender woman claims she was denied services based on her gender identity and gender expression and is seeking $50,000 for “immense harm to my dignity.”

windsorstar.com...

Here is where individual rights collide.

Trans-woman (with male genitalia) wants a genital waxing. Staff is all female and not personally comfortable and/or willing to wax male genitals.

Can spa owner legally force employees into doing something they do not feel comfortable doing?

Where does the rights of one (in this case, a Trans person) end and the rights of others begin?




Read the story:

"Following a conversation with an employee, she asked to speak with the owner. Carruthers said he called her back and explained that the female employee working that day was a practising Muslim who refrains from physical contact with males outside of her family.

He further explained the only staff member he had who did male waxing was off on a sick leave and there was no one else."

They did offer the service, but the individual who handled those customers was on sick leave. They weren't refusing the customer point blank, but just saying there wasn't a suitable time.

No different from a hairdressing shop having the ethnic hair, perm or color specialist being fully booked or on holiday leave. The shop wouldn't want to risk their reputation by assigning an unqualified person.


+5 more 
posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: kaylaluv



cis-gendered


Is that lib-speak for normal?


“Normal” is bigot-speak for cis-gendered.


No, normal is someone not deviating from the norm.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Relax, you totally misunderstood me.

I never once said this particular business should wax nuts, I said in threads like this or the gay wedding cake fiasco I never see people turn around and say:

I'll wax those nuts for $15


Heck, it costs that much to get eyebrow's waxed. This type of waxing starts at $100 minimum !

The trans women should have called ahead to make sure someone was available to do this service. This is all about scamming a small business by insisting they do something unreasonable !



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:27 PM
link   
a reply to: kaylaluv




cis-gendered

New to me, had to look that up. We used to just say normal people.

I have nothing against any human however they are born, but I do have a problem with people who just decide at some point to change into something else. They often put every one who knows them through hell and sometimes have mates and children which is pure selfishness. To consider it no a form of illness or birth defect is foolish in my opinion.

Life is difficult no mater how you :identify" it is also short and painful so why not just go through it with dignity as you are.
Also so many decide they want to go back, what are people like Caitlyn Jenner who now has a Female girlfriend? A mental problem not physical and was made worse by what he has done.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:27 PM
link   
Is the Muslim woman being bigoted to the transgender person for refusing them service?
...or is the transgender person bigoted for suing the Muslim woman's business because she wouldn't violate her religious beliefs and touch her balls?

This case is a confusing, hot, waxy, mess.


+6 more 
posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: SeaWorthy

Yes, she is using a fake word created by some moron in 1998 and apparently if you don’t use their made up word you are a bigot. Another reason I hate liberals.
edit on 2018/5/16 by Metallicus because: Eta



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Well we can't be "normal" because that would imply someone else isn't normal and that hurts feelings. Of course, they can't take the opportunity to look at their status as "special" which I always though of a positive way to be not normal, but I digress.

For some people, it's far more fun to ruin everyone else's day then find ways to make lemonade out of their lemons.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Orwell had nothing on modern SJW doublespeak, ya?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Metallicus

Well we can't be "normal" because that would imply someone else isn't normal and that hurts feelings. Of course, they can't take the opportunity to look at their status as "special" which I always though of a positive way to be not normal, but I digress.

For some people, it's far more fun to ruin everyone else's day then find ways to make lemonade out of their lemons.


Someone's lemons is what started this fiasco of a "news" article...



new topics

top topics



 
61
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join