It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
There will be no other service. Comcast? How many of you are chain-linked like slaves to this one ISP? I heard that Comcast has a marketshare which would qualify as a monopoly in several states..
"Statism?"
Like.. your ISP's bandwidth did not double or quadruple or made a tenfold increase over the last decade? Is that this statism?
What the Declaratory Ruling Would Do:
•Restore the classification of broadband Internet access service as an “information service”—the classification affirmed by the Supreme Court in the Brand X case.
•Reinstate the private mobile service classification of mobile broadband Internet access service.
•Clarify the effects of the return to an information service classification on other regulatory frameworks, including the need for a uniform federal regulatory approach to apply to interstate information services like broadband Internet access service. What the Report and Order Would Do:
•Adopt transparency requirements that ISPs disclose information about their practices to consumers, entrepreneurs, and the Commission.
•Restore the Federal Trade Commission’s ability to protect consumers online from any unfair,
deceptive, and anticompetitive practices without burdensome regulations, achieving comparable benefits at lower cost.
•Eliminate the vague and expansive Internet Conduct Standard, under which the FCC micromanaged innovative business models, along with the bright-line rules
.
What the Order Would Do:
•Find that the public interest is not served by adding to the already-voluminous record in this proceeding additional materials, including confidential materials submitted in other proceedings
The only internet anyone on these boards has ever used/known has been neutral. Strange how the moment Trump's administration wants to repeal neutrality his supporters hop on the bandwagon as if the internet they've been using for two decades was the worst thing ever. Like lemmings following king lemming over the edge.
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
How much should we bet if Trump was for Net Neutrality there would be a different tune from his supporters?
Gosh.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
The internet was neutral pre-2015, only when ISP's started trying to price gouge certain customers and block certain websites behind paywalls did it become law. The whole reason it was codified was because the ISP's were trying to screw the customer over. You want the ISP's to screw you over then repeal net neutrality.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
“Net neutrality” was always a euphemism for government-enforced conformity.
How?
Isn't it much more of "equality to all data"? How could that be seen as bad, besides from Comcast et al?
It’s the government determining how companies should operate, sticking its fingers in industries where it doesn’t belong.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: Southern Guardian
VETO PLEASE!
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
There will be no other service. Comcast? How many of you are chain-linked like slaves to this one ISP? I heard that Comcast has a marketshare which would qualify as a monopoly in several states..
"Statism?"
Like.. your ISP's bandwidth did not double or quadruple or made a tenfold increase over the last decade? Is that this statism?
No, statism is the belief that the government should control social and economic affairs.
I don't use comcast.
originally posted by: dug88
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
“Net neutrality” was always a euphemism for government-enforced conformity.
How?
Isn't it much more of "equality to all data"? How could that be seen as bad, besides from Comcast et al?
It’s the government determining how companies should operate, sticking its fingers in industries where it doesn’t belong.
To you and everyone else saying this idiotic #...
THE INTERNET IS NOT A #ING INDUSTRY
The internet was not created by private companies, the Internet's infrastructure was not built by private companies. It is a #ing global network of machines linked together.
The internet is not an American thing, the internet is not private property. It never has been and it never should be.
how the #ing internet works
originally posted by: Grambler
I am noy informed enough to have an opinion on rather this is good or bad.
I do wonder though if this isnt a first step in the government saying other things are like a utility.
I can see republicans that are angry with google, facebook, and twitter now saying they should be able to ensure those "utilities" do not censor conservative views.
It would be interesting to see both sides flip their arguments if it comes to that.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
The only internet anyone on these boards has ever used/known has been neutral. Strange how the moment Trump's administration wants to repeal neutrality his supporters hop on the bandwagon as if the internet they've been using for two decades was the worst thing ever. Like lemmings following king lemming over the edge.
Want slower internet unless you pay more? Repeal net neutrality. Want certain sites blocked unless you buy a more expensive package? Repeal net neutrality. Those who want net neutrality repealed on the basis that it is "control by the government" are only giving that supposed control fully to corporations who only care about "controlling" the money in your pocket.