It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump expected to cut Planned Parenthood funding

page: 1
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:30 AM
link   

The Trump administration may take action to cut federal funding to Planned Parenthood as a result of pressure from congressional Republicans and anti-abortion lobbyists. Opponents of abortion have launched an all-out campaign urging the administration to bring back Reagan-era abortion restrictions on federal family planning dollars that would target Planned Parenthood.

thehill.com...

PP was formed by Margaret Sanger, a racist and eugenics supporter, for the specific purpose of eliminating the Black race. Look it up.

People who support PP are racists who want Black babies to die. President Trump wants to defund PP because he cares about Black people




posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:37 AM
link   
a reply to: NorthernLites

While I support and applaud the decision, don't expect too much actual debate here.

Those for abortion will never change their minds, those against abortion will never change theirs.

It's a sad reflection on society as a whole that this is happening.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: NorthernLites

I don't get it... "People who support PP are racists who want Black babies to die. President Trump wants to defund PP because he cares about Black people"

Nobodies killing black babies...? Planed Parenthood is preventing pregnancy and unfortunately Roe V Wade, aborting babies, but in all races or colors. If the babies make it to the swaddling cloth, I think they are home free. And as far as President Trump, I think he's trying to phase out career welfare recipients.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: NorthernLites
PP was formed by Margaret Sanger, a racist and eugenics supporter, for the specific purpose of eliminating the Black race. Look it up.

People who support PP are racists who want Black babies to die. President Trump wants to defund PP because he cares about Black people

There are many many insane leaps of logic in this and it is beyond dumb that this argument keeps resurfacing. This is like saying that all Republicans are Socialists because the Republican party was formed by Socialists.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: NorthernLites

While I support and applaud the decision, don't expect too much actual debate here.

What's to debate when the OP is one giant strawman accusation against PP supporters?


+1 more 
posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: NorthernLites

Why is it when you kill a pregnant woman they charge you with 2 homicides - the mother and baby? If you just kill the baby it is perfectly legal. The baby is not a person. If the baby isn't a person with legal rights how is it possible to be charged in the first case?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Dead babies
Can't take care of themselves
Dead babies
Can't take things off the shelf
Well we didn't need you anyway
Lalala-la, lalala-la, la la la
Goodbye, Little Betty



Thanks Planned Murderhood !



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:52 AM
link   
“Liberals hate black people and want to exterminate them through planned parenthood.” - Some conservative guy
“Liberals want to see the white race exterminated because of their own white guilt.” That same conservative guy.


What are my opinions today?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: NorthernLites

ya know, it's kind of humorous that in a time when the eugenicists were trying like heck to start (and maybe succeeding) federal programs to sterilized unsuspecting women and men of those unwanted groups of people,
its Sanger's name that is always brought up as being the Eugenicist... although there were many more well known more influential men that made a much bigger mark on history than her....
where those men were working hard in an effort to sterilize through deceit or force....
little Sanger opened one little clinic, not in a black neighborhood, but rather a jewish neighborhood. and where the true eugenicists would have been more than happy to have dumped enough hormones into a tribe's water supply to sterilze the tribe out of existence... those jewish women willingly lined up outside of that clinic eagerly accepting what she was offering... what many of the more affluent white women of the time were traveling to europe for... information and what would now be considered quite primitive birth control devices. just as many white women use the birth control pills that sanger invested in developing during her time. no one is forcing them to, they are choosing to do it!
please explain to me just how it's eugenics to try to provide to the poor minority groups the danged same things that the rich white women were traveling halfway around the world to obtain?
maybe it is you that needs to do a little more "looking up"!

as far as defunding planned parenthood? well good luck on that one. even if he manages to get the move accepted by the court systems, good luck cleaning up the mess that planned parenthood denying patients eligible for medicaid and title x program their services for free would cause...



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:59 AM
link   
Best anti abortion song ever:




posted on May, 16 2018 @ 09:59 AM
link   


PP was formed by Margaret Sanger, a racist and eugenics supporter, for the specific purpose of eliminating the Black race. Look it up.


So what? Do you know how much chit in American history and heritage is racist as hell? Take a number and stand in line.

Planned Parenthood does a lot. And there is nothing wrong with a women having abortions. The people that are against it need to calm down (because they don't care at all) and go down to the social services, and adopt ALL the children there.

That is where those children will end up, what moral authority do you have to force a woman to have a child, especially since no one but her knows their situation. Religion is not any kind of moral authority. It has morality but no authority.

And i'll repeat it again, you don't care. Because you don't care whom or how that unwanted child will be raised. Shame on you all.


edit on 16-5-2018 by cenpuppie because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:06 AM
link   
My take on abortion is that for some reason it is a "social necessity" but it is always an individual tragedy. I wonder how many slums we would have in the western world if abortion was never legalized. Either thought I have on it is just sad. We just all need to keep it in our pants sometimes.

Keeping that in mind, the human element - the need to procreate - is sometimes had with no thought of consequences. I tend to think abortion is one of those consequences.

The oddball thing is that now the west is all morally ok with abortion, the east (muslim peoples) are taking over because they do not get abortions - if they are true believers. So basically the social good of abortion will probably fail in the end because a religion refutes it and has more babies and soon becomes the majority.

Everything is like that with us poor humans isn't it?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: NorthernLites


Why is it that the majority of those who flaunt their (R) and fight like Mad "for the babies" but once those same babies are born, these same folks are nowhere to be found? And when they are located, they're fighting like crazy (again) to have funds cut for the babies, whose Mothers fell for the rhetoric?

Where are they then?

Would it be better for ALL concerned (Like You) if females who found themselves pregnant were back to searching for a back alley Doctor who did abortions with a coat hanger?


How about this remedy...... Make it like the Lottery™. If a person is on Welfare, they can get a 1 time cash settlement in lieu of collecting each month. If You opt for the cake, You're done...

Did You know that when the Automakers were given their FREE $$$ BailOut, the Gov't. could've given every person who paid taxes in 2007, a total of $25,500.00 EACH. My contention is IF that FREE BAILOUT $$$ were dispersed to the U.S. Taxpayer, it would've been way more beneficial than giving the Automakers Board Members raises and bonu$e$ especially after showing a LOSS..

Same thing happened to the MorganStanley™ New York office AFTER they under-reported losses totaling $9BILLION $$$$



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Fools
The oddball thing is that now the west is all morally ok with abortion, the east (muslim peoples) are taking over because they do not get abortions - if they are true believers. So basically the social good of abortion will probably fail in the end because a religion refutes it and has more babies and soon becomes the majority.

Muslims aren't taking over in the west... That is just propaganda. Muslims still only make up around 1% of the total population in the US and 6% in Europe. Even with predicted growth rates neither of those percentages will exceed 10% any time soon.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:16 AM
link   


👼



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Fools
The oddball thing is that now the west is all morally ok with abortion, the east (muslim peoples) are taking over because they do not get abortions - if they are true believers. So basically the social good of abortion will probably fail in the end because a religion refutes it and has more babies and soon becomes the majority.

Muslims aren't taking over in the west... That is just propaganda. Muslims still only make up around 1% of the total population in the US and 6% in Europe. Even with predicted growth rates neither of those percentages will exceed 10% any time soon.


It will happen. If policies do not change it will happen. You can pretend that it won't happen, but it will.



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: NorthernLites

Why is it when you kill a pregnant woman they charge you with 2 homicides - the mother and baby? If you just kill the baby it is perfectly legal. The baby is not a person. If the baby isn't a person with legal rights how is it possible to be charged in the first case?


This!!!!



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Hmmm... What else could Trump do which negates major advantages for humanity (like EPA, Planned Parenthood)?

I wonder how he feels about the #me2-thing..

Come on guys, what else does a Trump-supporter hate? Obviously he would not remove the government, at least not until he leaves (last-day-decision?).
What about..

Cutting funding of public libraries? Check!

Converting National Parks into drilling zones? Check!

Damn! Okay, what about...

Cutting public school funding? Che-eck!

Seriously, what kind of bad decision can he still make that he didn't think of yet?



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Fools

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Fools
The oddball thing is that now the west is all morally ok with abortion, the east (muslim peoples) are taking over because they do not get abortions - if they are true believers. So basically the social good of abortion will probably fail in the end because a religion refutes it and has more babies and soon becomes the majority.

Muslims aren't taking over in the west... That is just propaganda. Muslims still only make up around 1% of the total population in the US and 6% in Europe. Even with predicted growth rates neither of those percentages will exceed 10% any time soon.


It will happen. If policies do not change it will happen. You can pretend that it won't happen, but it will.

Lol. Great rebuttal. "It's going to happen. I have no data or basis to support this argument, but dammit my fears and insecurities tell me its true!"



posted on May, 16 2018 @ 10:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Tekaran

Define "baby".







 
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join