It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -s3V3n-

page: 84
177
<< 81  82  83    85  86  87 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 19 2018 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Q was created by Trump for public information purposes. Thats why there's a pro-Trump tone among Qsters.

Even if it outrages the orwellian-commie-psyop-goodthink-crowd, I hereby officially declare support for Trump.


tbh, when you spend your time creating multi-paragraph rants about the clintons you don't have to explicitly tell ME you're a trump supporter.

trump created Q and i'm a commie, got it. your world is an interesting place!




posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:13 PM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

I'm starting to see this whole Q thing really is all for the children. The common denominator between all the corruption that has been discovered is trafficking/sex abuse.

I firmly believe that most of the perpetrators will be charged with lesser crimes similar to the mobsters. Slowly this problem will diminish and correct itself. We can return to being mindful, loving and compassionate beings.

I wish justice could be served accordingly. However, I think it would be too much for the majority to handle.
edit on 19-5-2018 by nikkib0421 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:13 PM
link   
a reply to: fiverx313

They are linking to yournewswire now, I honestly think they are just trolling ATS



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Whereismypassword

Who are "they"? Care to be more specific about this trolling?



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: LurkNoMore

Finland’s Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by prosecutors to convict a 23-year-old asylum seeker who had sex with a 10-year-old of aggravated rape, ruling she was not forced. The decision baffled prosecutors and caused outrage among members of the public, but was upheld by an appeal court, which agreed there was “no evidence to indicate that the sexual encounter involved violence or that the child was overcome by fear or incapacitated in any other way”, according to Yle.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot



There you go, quoted for someone who missed this



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: nikkib0421
a reply to: MountainLaurel

If we are crazy, well, at least I am in good company. Or....maybe the crazy ones are actually the most sane. Considering the crazy, backwards world we apparently live in.

I have always felt the Law of Attraction was being used in this whole Q thing. An experiment(maybe not the right word) in mass positive group think.


Nik,

What is happening with Q is unique. What is happening on a mass, open source scale, is something that was once taught in "mystery" schools to individuals under the guise of secrecy and special-ness. It may not seem like it due to the all inclusive nature, but I assure it is. Lets go back to the most recent controlled opposition uprising - Occupation Wall Street.

Well meaning people protesting. Demanding others that they think are screwing them change their ways. The speeches and calls for change while heartfelt and earnest, were ignorant of the reality. I heard Rothschild, cabal, credit default swaps, conspiracy this and that. I never heard one person say, "in 1933 the government took away money, the legal remedy was to agree to cover all debts and they are failing to do that...." Why not? Without that start, the Wall Street folks giggled at how the ignorant protesters want change without knowing the truth. The thing they wanted changed did not exist in their reality to begin with, so instead of change, occupiers fueled their energy into creating more the same: anyone see a different world today?

Now, far more important. Law of Attraction is a lie, we create. Source creates, there is nothing outside of source, so what can it attract? We are source, therefor we create and only create, but we perceive we attract: brain glitch combined with programming and a deeper level soul choice. Try and attract an apple from the kitchen to you? If you are attracting how come it is only sometimes?

Why does this matter? The controllers know this. They get us to CREATE the reality we see. Q school is helping people, in ways they cannot yet perceive (yet....) that we/you/source are creating a new reality. You can only create a new reality when you finally know what the old one really looks like. Again, until you truly see/understand the reality you are creating, you cannot create a new one. This happens because people fear that if they give up the old reality they will die or suffer (irony I know), so they hedge, repeat the old, asking for tiny, safe changes.

So. Q gives clues, people get together and use their energy to both, simultaneously suss out what the reality they are creating is, and open up to a new reality by truly seeing the reality as it stands. Empowerment. This is the feeling part of this enterprise, the feeling is the power, and where that energy goes it will create.

The Q clues are complex for a reason, ambiguous for reason, so that each person can find a tiny pocket of creation that needs to be uncreated to open up a liberation reality instead of a slightly modified version that OWS produced.

What is very interesting is many here have said, "look what has happened in 6 months..." While others have said, "what has happened, nothing..." Are both right? Those who see change have changed, are empowered, those who do not see change can't see it in themselves yet (yet....)



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:43 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

It truly is a "Great Awakening" I believe that is the best term for our current situation.



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Whereismypassword

Thanks, I did.



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Whereismypassword


Finland: No aggravated rape sentence for 23-year-old migrant who raped 10-year-old girl



A 23-year-old migrant, named Juusuf Muhamed Abbud, was acquitted from aggravated rape despite having intercourse with a ten-year-old girl. The court said it was not clear that the girl was “unable to defend herself and express her lack of consent”.


Voice of Europe


Ruling in child sexual abuse case goes against public sense of justice



The Turku Court of Appeal has generated intense debate on social media by acquitting a 23-year-old man of the charge of aggravated rape, despite his having had intercourse with a ten-year-old girl.


Helsinki Times

Where it is sourced from doesn't negate the fact that it is true.



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:03 PM
link   
as disturbing as this Finland case is, i don't understand the relevance to Q. isn't this off-topic?




posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Re: The Royal Wedding

I noticed how as the camera panned around, so many like Charles and Philip sat stone faced and completely unmoved by Rev. Michael Curry's passionate and excellent sermon about the redemptive power of love and of God's love. It was funny to see.

www.cnn.com...



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
Re: The Royal Wedding

I noticed how as the camera panned around, so many like Charles and Philip sat stone faced and completely unmoved by Rev. Michael Curry's passionate and excellent sermon about the redemptive power of love and of God's love. It was funny to see.

www.cnn.com...



Those guys are having some "preoccupied" thoughts I think.

😄🦔



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: fiverx313
as disturbing as this Finland case is, i don't understand the relevance to Q. isn't this off-topic?


It's the hook, was for me anyway, and now that hook's in my gullet.



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:28 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Another excellent Q eduction lesson, CrankyOldMan. Thank-you!



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:31 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:47 PM
link   
On May 5, Rel came up with the magic square result:



originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
A quiet posting night so i'll add some magic square results:
Q post #1317;
May 4 2018 21:21:37 (EST) Q !2jsTvXXmXs, 65:


Input parameters
grid= 21x21 - why? Hr:mins from post
keyword = UNPRECEDENTED - Why? only capitalised word from post!

Result
On diagonal as per COVFEFE method = "MWKJTHNVICOXVD"


Found here

Today I stumble on this Washington Examiner story, Trump endorses Republican businessman John Cox for California governor

The results of Rel's magic square look like John Cox is in there. But what caught my attention about the article was a single paragraph.


Cox and Orange County Assemblyman Travis Allen, both Republicans, are seeing to woo enough voters for the June 5 primary in order to gain one of two spots in the November general election. In the event Republicans fail to garner enough support, two Democrats could go head-to-head.


What is that all about, Two Dmocrats going head to head in the November election. So I looked it up, and the Wiki sayeth thus regarding the California Governor's race:


A primary election will be held on June 5, 2018. Under California's nonpartisan blanket primary law, all candidates appear on the same ballot, regardless of party. Voters may vote for any candidate, regardless of their party affiliation. The top two finishers – regardless of party – advance to the general election in November, regardless of whether a candidate manages to receive a majority of the votes cast in the primary election.


I didnt know that is how California runs things. That seems like a high hurdle to clear for any party except the Democtratic party. It's not my state, so I have no skin in the game, but I was unfamiiliar with how they do it out there.

edit on 19-5-2018 by CoramDeo because: Be Bold



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:53 PM
link   
Since today is slow and a great time for reading I ran across this spreadsheet. It has links to articles that lays out the whole timeline of treason. Whoever compiled this spreadsheet did a superb job. I am still reading it but thought I would share with the Qsters and naysayers. I'm sure that the Qsters know this timeline already but it is a great starting point for anyone who is just waking up to dive into.

Timeline of treason



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Thanks cranky. By the way, I think you should change your name to crankyoldsage. Your posts always challenge me to think of things from an alternative angle.

I do understand what you're saying (I think). I'm going to ponder this more.



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: CoramDeo

good one !!

👍



posted on May, 19 2018 @ 02:02 PM
link   


twitter.com...



Who said yesterday watch the passenger list?

Somebody did and they were right.




top topics



 
177
<< 81  82  83    85  86  87 >>

log in

join