It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A man who allegedly planned a Christmas Day bombing and shooting attack at San Francisco's Pier 39 will plead guilty in a federal case.
Court records showed Everitt Aaron Jameson will enter a plea on June 4 in federal court in Fresno.
[NP 8:11 “Speaker [xxxxxxx] your protection against…”]
[JD 8:13 “[ABC] has an interest in this…”]
[NP 8:14 “——————— Pier 39…”]
What is Jack's SECRET T-handle?
'Dummy' accounts to talk.
What you SEE is LIMITED.
Think emails (LL, HRC, HUSSEIN, etc).
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
originally posted by: Grambler
I just want to again applaud you for all of the time and energy you out and not your synopsis.
Rather people believe q or not, your work is exactly the kind that drew me to ats in the the first to place and the effort should be appreciated by everyone from believers to skeptics
Grambler, love your posts, big fan.
But this is really bugging me...
It's whether, not rather. I don't know whether I will weather the weather.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: carewemust
It was a Q authentication I was pointing to. He asked us to search out the name, we do, then it appears in the speech afterwards. Was I mistaken about the timing?
Wasn't it obvious from the second Q post below the speech? Maybe I should have ordered it the other way around?
I'm just trying like the rest of us, no need to get cold and snarky.
Q said in #1371 that 2 NYPD detectives were murdered in mid-2017. Last night, we (this thread) were only able to identify 1, officer Miosotis Familia.
When I saw President Trump honoring the Familia family on stage today, I knew that Q was referring to Miosotis Familia last night, as one of the murdered NYPD detectives.
But who was the 2nd NYPD detective murdered in mid-2017?
I'm used to Q giving us advance insight into things to come.
What's most perplexing to me, is that often times, Q does not share this information, unless an 8-chan ANON asks a question, or makes a statement.
Last night, if the ANON had not made those comments at the top of message #1371, Q would not have told us to look for 2 murdered NYPD detectives who (possibly?) saw the Weiner laptop files.
There are many instances where an ANON initiates the conversation that ends up yielding valuable disclosures from Q. Do you think Q sends an ANON a private message saying, "Ask me about this, so I can share what I know." ??