It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: FlyingFox
I understand your point that the story has been re-crafted to make it more palatable....that's the world we live in.
I don't have a problem with that but people should have enough common sense to realize that you are not going to sell your soul to god for sex, drugs and rock-n-roll.
The premise itself sounds off.
John Locke (1632–1704) is among the most influential political philosophers of the modern period. In the Two Treatises of Government, he defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. He argued that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property. Since governments exist by the consent of the people in order to protect the rights of the people and promote the public good, governments that fail to do so can be resisted and replaced with new governments. Locke is thus also important for his defense of the right of revolution. Locke also defends the principle of majority rule and the separation of legislative and executive powers. In the Letter Concerning Toleration, Locke denied that coercion should be used to bring people to (what the ruler believes is) the true religion and also denied that churches should have any coercive power over their members. Locke elaborated on these themes in his later political writings, such as the Second Letter on Toleration and Third Letter on Toleration.
Assange has betrayed many Anons.
But, has he betrayed "Anonymous?"
Who is Anonymous?
In reply to the criticism that microtubules are found in (unconscious) plant cells too, Hameroff said that plants have only a small number of microtubules, likely too few to reach the threshold needed for consciousness. But he also noted that Gregory Engel of the University of Chicago and colleagues have observed quantum effects in plant photosynthesis. “If a tomato or rutabaga can utilize quantum coherence at warm temperature, why can't our brains?” Hameroff said.
originally posted by: CoramDeo
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Revisiting the photos as I was thinking something.
NASA 11. I assume the 11th? Eleventh of what?? 11/11/2018???
I wonder, for the more skilled Knights. Cor, Rel et al....
If the pictures contain more detailed information in the image proportions or details? As in maybe Image size or Canvas size? Could the measurements, say on the island photos, show Long and lat? Or a date code? In the above photo notice the odd crop, why not full frame?
So, I went ahead and downloaded the picture of Space Shuttle Columbia from Qpost 1412 to take a look at it.
Of course there is no significant EXIF data. Probably stripped out prior to or as a by-product of uploading to the Chans.
Second thing i dug into was the file name. The hex hash didn't yield anything significant, either. I'm guessing that the original file name is ether given as a hash of the original file name or it is generated, again, by the Chan board, or both.
You noted that the picture was cropped oddly, so I went to Web page for the California Science Center / Space Shuttle Endeavor - Los Angeles, CA where, presumably, the original picture could be found.
In doing so, I found something interesting. I thought the picture Q posted was a cropped and blown up version of the original, but I don't believe that it is. The picture Q posted is either an original taken at a close, but slightly different angle approximating the one posted on the page for the science center, or its an unpublished pic from the same roll as the science center pic.
In the first shot you can see that the margin where the flap is on the trailing edge of the wing is in a sligtly different position in the two pics. I think this shows that the position of the camera is slightly different in the two images, even if its only off by a few inches.
In the second pic you can see that the light fixture hanging from the ceiling is illuminated along its entire length in the pic from the science center. It's probably a reflection caused by another light that isn't in the frame. In the pic posted by Q, the fixture does not capture this reflected light. Again, probalby due to a slightly different camera position.
As to the U in "United" printed on the wing cropped fromthe bottom to look like an 11, I'm not sure it has any significance. Maybe 11/11, but I have no idea.
I also took a look at the picture dimensions to see if maybe Q's pic was cropped specifically. The dimensions in inches are W:8.89'', and H:4.10''. I took 8.89 as a date of August 1989. On 08-08-89, Space Shuttle Columbia (the doomed shuttle, not Endeavorform the pic) flew mission STS-28, which was a classified DOD mission to put two satellites into orbit. The statellites were either photo reconaissance or Satellite Data Relay rigs.
If I get time tomorrow I'll take a look at some of the other pics and see if there are some interesting connections. I don't really think I hit on anything tonight, maybe I'll have an epihany after I sleep on it.
Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 5a8a44 No.1366780 📁
May 10 2018 22:54:21 (EST)
Note the pictures we post are ALL originals.
Think about what that means.
How can assange be betraying anyone at this point when he an only communicate with his lawyer?
originally posted by: Skyfloating
Julian Assange IS Wikileaks.
If Julian Assange cant communicate, Wikileaks cant communicate.
So WHO exactly is the "Wikileaks" that is denigrating Q?
First they shut him up and then they take over his Wikileaks and post on his behalf. And one of the most important posts of post-Assange days is one smearing Q. What a coincidence. All for a LARP.
Over the weekend, the International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation held its annual conference in Chicago, and some of the sessions they held were advocating the same kinds of pseudoscience used in the 1980s to fuel the Satanic Panic.
That’s why members of The Satanic Temple’s Grey Faction were outside the Palmer House Hilton on Saturday, where the event was being held, to protest the harmful practices pushed by the ISSTD.
Today’s protest action is intended to draw awareness to the issues surrounding pseudoscience Recovered Memory Therapy, Dissociative Identity Disorder, and the hazards of an insular therapeutic community self-policing against harmful practices against their own economic interests. … Self-described as a “non-profit, professional association” that promotes “clinically effective, empirically based resources” for Mental Health professions, the ISSTD’s professional and scientific facade does not conceal their continued history of using therapy to promote debunked and discredited notions of international conspiracy.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: Skyfloating
Wikileaks isn't even aware of the fact that Q migrated to 8. They are still confusing people with the lie that it's 4chan trolls. Since when does WL care about a LARP anyways. When was the last time they leaked real damaging intel? WL is comped. The Krassenstein fraudsters picked this "story" up and that's another nail in the coffin for the LARP yelling crowd. The more they try to discredit Q the more resilient we become. I just laugh when another e-celeb outs himself as a moneywhore. We don't need people like them who are only in it for Fame,Glory and Money. This is bigger than all of us.