Analog Digital Phenomenon Hypothesis

a reply to: zeroPointOneQ

For whatever reason I've noticed, that the 'phenomenon' is able to
establish a link with neurons (such as in the stomach and intestines)
and hormones and neuropeptides (but again in the lower body) much
more easily than a direct connection to the brain.

Then, these hormones and neuropeptides can cross the blood brain
barrier into the brain.

In ancient times, for spiritual purposes, people deprived themsleves
of sex.

This would increase testosterone and other levels, which could then
cross the blood brain barrier.

Only some hormones can do this.. such as cortisol and testosterone.

Cortisol is increased by stress... such as the stress of seeing a strange
UFO, which can, once a foothold is gained in that hormone, can then
cross into the brain.

I really do think that I understand a great deal more of this, than
possibly anyone alive.. and I'm sharing this as I feel comfortable.

Of course I could be wrong.

I'm also so obnoxious that nobody wants to work with me.. so all
that I can do is post on ATS or something like that and hope that
people will steal my work.

Kev

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

No you're right. These hormones can cause an 'infinite loop' after the initial trigger. Very hard to get out of once they last long enough. (don't know how to put it in English)

Thing that bothers me is that certain meditations are supposed to get you out of this loop? (sleep is supposed to as well, but too high levels of these hormone make you unable to sleep if I understand these things correctly)

I need to look more into this to be fair. I'm too much of a generalist ...

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

I couldn't resist and had to at least go through the OP:

Machines don't evolve, that is next to impossible to programme something that keeps constantly adapting to unforseen circumstances and enhance the performance accordingly.
Like the movie "Transcendence" you would really need to upload an analog intelligence, which would be into a quantum computer using DNA as storage medium. Not impossible, but why would someone do that, since we have it already? An analog being using digital intelligence, ie "us".

But I do agree if something can overcome space-time it needs to be matter-less, since we know time is gravity and speed related.


It doesn't always lie. It's spanning throughout all parallel- & multiverse in which all possibilities are true.
Human-Solaris-centered thinking is the problem, which made groups like "The Nine", Bigelow,... fail so hard.

The Intelligence Emerging from information is a natural occurence and constantly learning too.
( Besides that we have a few problems with meme-tulpas. )

The phenomenon itself is not self-aware like we are, it just organizes without self interest, that's why we can't have conversations with it, it doesn't have a "self" which sees any ant, it's always everything itself.

Or at least that's my point of view...

a reply to: zeroPointOneQ

I'd welcome more thoughts on what you just said.

The thing that goes "wrong" with "Kundalini" most of all,
is people get caught in this self-imposed 'reward loop'
that exhausts their ability to create certain hormones
and damages them in many ways.

I'd say that "Kundalini" is actually a harmful practice..
but that a similar practice, if done carefully, can
indeed "terraform" the lower body and eventually
the brain, so that one can become a willing host to
the 'Phenomenon' without damaging oneself.

I'd say that in the Phenomenon's opinion.. that is the
entire purpose of the human race.. to become willing
symbiotes.

But humans tend to disagree.

They tend to think that they have 'souls',
when in fact when there is anything much
there at all.. it's really "the phenomenon".

Humans and the "phenomenon" never learned
how to share this world, and now that their
vast fields of humans are getting destroyed
by EMF, "they" would view that life on Earth
is ending from their perspective.

I'm not in a word mincing mood today.

I could have kept all this to myself and
written some semi-famous book..but
I don't want to...

I have 'terraformed syndrome' I guess..

it's known to happen, especially among
'spiritual teachers'.

Past a certain point, you get so transformed,
that you become really lazy...

it feels like your 'work is done' -- so you don't
want to work anymore.

Or I"m just really lazy and full of sheiss.
I hardly care with which is true..

Kev

a reply to: Peeple

When the Phenomenon is symbiotic with an organic like us,
it gains "selfhood" to some degree.. at least WHILE it's in
the human. this is part of the "drug rush" we give it.

Once the human dies.. most of that "selfhood" evaporates..
but it does carry bits of 'selfhood' into it's transcendant
self.

We are just machines.. no more.. no less... that are
interacting with another group of machines..

or we are all organic.

It hardly matters how you think about it.

Kev

PS: I don't think your thinking is that far off track..
it might just need some more time to mature IMHO.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

But that's not true either, in my personal experience there are "dead people" working on solving this mystery too, from the other side.
We are not one with the phenomenon at least not yet, if we were we could access the 98.8% non-coding DNA. So we are in a way each of us in big parts lonely wanderers.

The organic machine is not the only thing that seperate us from the phenomenon. Even without it you don't miraculously become singularity. There's a 98.8% knowledge barrier.

....It's a work in progress. Isn't it always?

a reply to: Peeple

You and i will have deep differences in opinion on some matters,
as things you assume to be 100% true and important, to me are
100% wrong and harmful (and not important).

That's ok. We are friends.

But you'll find that I won't even converse with you on certain
topics like death, what happens after death, the true nitty
gritty on 'souls' and all that.

Iv'e died twice so far and come back. Once as a "fully realized
yogi" who "went to the afterlife while still alive".

When I say that I'm something of a thanatologist, I'm not joking.

But I'm not discussing this topic with anyone, and don't share
the usual assumptions.

To me, "death and what happens and why" is the single most
unimportant subject that I can imagine.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

I died too, 2014 I remember it like yesterday. I go close to death on purpose quite often, because I have learned it helps me gain permeability.
You slammed the door shut. I say that without judging we are two different people on the same quest, but I go as dark-priest and you as tank/palladin maybe...
If you get that metaphor?
Let's keep thinking and see where we cross-paths and where we collide, could be important.

a reply to: Peeple

I don't mean to be rude.. and hell I might write about it someday for
all I know.

But people get so attached to their delusions / path,
and they get so hurt if something messes with it.

I just don't want to cause anyone needless pain.

And again.. I could be wrong.

Frankly, I'm almost eager to discuss death.. it's one of my favorite
topics.

But I shouldn't.

Kev

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

I'm eagerly waiting for you to do so, when the time feels right.
Frankly I "know" nothing about death. I just use it.
So I might at least learn something it wouldn't be "needless pain".
At least not for me. But you might hurt yourself?

a reply to: Peeple

I might at that.

There is always a price to be paid, when attempting
to 'fly with the eagles'.

I'm not talking philosophically here.. every time in my life
that I've 'made a request' and when it's been granted,
there has always been hell to pay.. for decades upon
decades sometimes.

Kev

Observer 1 brought this up in another thread and I've considered it before. I definitely won't say it's conclusive, but I do believe it deserves a good look-see as regards Dr. Santilli's assertions. He believes he's found entities that are beyond the perception of our senses. It's not a new thought as we all know but is this technique valid? Is it optic aberration or is he on to something?

a reply to: The GUT

Thanks for the vid!

Normally i ignore a lot of links/vids passed to me,
but you are on my short list of respect.

I'll watch it when time permits and respond about it.

Kev

Chinese Gypsies:

www.china.org.cn...

a reply to: The GUT

Well you know that I'm all for the possibility of 'entities'.

But this guy's just a fraud.

Photons have no antiparticle.. there is no such thing
as "anti-matter light".

Concave lenses are also not magical.

If you watch his vids, you see a lot of blurry dust particles.

Frankly I'm not sure how he vids the streamers, but I wouldn't
say that they are anything other than an optical effect.

That's my opinion on this.

Kev

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

I guess that science is further along than I knew.

It was about 10-15 years ago when I was in the 'radiant phase'
of a "kundalini awakening" when I was able to communicate
with the "offspring" right before it went on to the next phase
of it's lifecycle.

Now this communication was not verbal.. it was visual..
so I was able to see various things which have shaped
my point of view ever since.

One of the big things I learned, was how the "information
entities" that run everything use the Casimir force to
symbiotically relate with organic creatures like us.

Well, what I learned was slightly different than in the
paper above.. but I"m a little surprised that science
(at least "black science") is maybe at the same level
or even ahead of my expertise on this point.

And this is a public paper from 2013.

Fascinating.

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Thank you. I'll catch up on it later!

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

That's truly amazing! Thanks for linking!

...2013....gosh am I late to the party!

& as PDF too! I know now what I'll be reading today.

It makes me wonder if that's true for two "universe membrane touching points" too? Ie between two black holes, from one universe to the touching one, space-time functioning as the two non-charged (in this case not metallic of course) plates in an "almost vacuum"?

a reply to: Peeple

From what I know, only 'gravity' could have an effect between
universes.. the ultra fine perturbations of casmiri level effects
wouldn't. I don't do mandela effect.