Legal Reference to Mind Control, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 18-2-2005 @ 11:31 AM by MemoryShock
Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced the Space Preservation Act of 2001 to the House of Representatives. Following is an excerpt from the original draft.........



(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or


This passage was drawn as a legal definition for:


(1) The term `space´ means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2)(A) The terms `weapon´ and `weapons system´ mean a device capable of any of the following:


Notice that a congressman saw fit to acknowledge the potential for, "mood management and mind control." For a congressman to note the potential for an abuse is to recognise the existence of current methods, which are useful upon a population in a limited service as factors can help to vary the exposure or interpretation of the stimulii by any given person. The inclusion of this in an "outer space" reference implies the possibility for a much broader application of said techniques, also impling at least a rudimentary knowledge of EMG, ELF, and other effects that longe-range waves of intense frequencies can have on an individual.

Following are two links, one for the proposed bill with the references to mood management and mind control, the other for the passed proposal, which no longer contains said references.
First

Second


My take on this is that the omition of the mind control references in the accepted bill was to prevent a legal definition of mind control and subsequent legal identification and analysis of techniques as well as sciences supporting it. Also, the unquantifiable nature of any given persons mindset would have made such an attempt to define mind control a difficult one. That would have given rise to the speculation, based in curiosity not incredulity, on the many applications in our society for satellites and other longe-range wave inclusive technologies, such as HAARP.

Of course, one could attribute this to the paranoid mind of a congressman, but also notice the terms "psychotronic," and "information war." These are accepted and widely used tactics that are designed for the population, read propoganda. To influence the opinion and personality of an individual goes a long way to ensure a support base for your own operations/ideals. In tandem with propoganda, mood management would create an ideal combination for the application of the desired opinions/ideals, and this could be expanded to create a few prominent mindsets. "Divide and Conquer," as the population would be to busy with infighting(if a population can be viewed as an entity in the political-socio-economic forum) to effect any thing that is not supprted by existing information disseminations. But these are my own ruminations.........
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags