The issue with atheism

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Welcome to the world of Randyvs.

It would be more apt for my avatar to be his

a reply to: noonebutme

Lol, I actually like Randy in any discussion outside of god claims.
I'll be like a dog with a bone everytime he pulls his faith/belief out as fact.
It isn't, and he knows it as well.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Lol no, you are the one who looks ridiculous, making claims of gods, like claiming goblins exist then expecting people to believe you...because 'you know' LMFAO, you know # all, you just have blind faith.

No you're more of it

You're not worth my time

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Lol no, you are the one who looks ridiculous, making claims of gods, like claiming goblins exist then expecting people to believe you...because 'you know' LMFAO, you know # all, you just have blind faith.

No you're more of it

What is that even supposed to mean?
Try a logical argument mate, instead of cryptic woo woo bull#.

originally posted by: randyvs
Answers are what you should be looking for instead of wasting your time heckling the answers i for see you finding. You have a job cut out for you before you can say I'm wrong. Stick to it or continue this bullshlt arrogant premature immature argument.

Whoa, steady on, snowflake. No need to get triggered. We're having a civil discussion.

And hey - you could be right. Science might eventually find there is some supernatural realm. That the sub-sub-particles of atoms have a 'god-wuz-here' signature on them. And you know what? Science would say, "Yup, looks like there is a God." You know why? E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E.

But, you lack any demonstrable proof. Out of all your cajoling, mewing and spittle-laden quips, you haven't given anyone anything to back up anything you have said.

You demonstrate to me how life came from God. Don't just say "Life begets life" that isn't an answer. That's like a petulant 5 year old arguing his point by repeatedly saying "Because" louder and louder

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
Lol, I actually like Randy in any discussion outside of god claims.
I'll be like a dog with a bone everytime he pulls his faith/belief out as fact.
It isn't, and he knows it as well.

To be fair, I do too. As much as I argue with him, he's not a bad guy.

Just misguided and living in a cave.

originally posted by: noonebutme
And hey - you could be right. Science might eventually find there is some supernatural realm. That the sub-sub-particles of atoms have a 'god-wuz-here' signature on them. And you know what? Science would say, "Yup, looks like there is a God." You know why? E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E.

And if it was verifiable then I'd accept it in a heartbeat.
As my former professor asserted in his belief, science just explains how his god did it. I have no problem with that theory, just a pity the religious ones are so unwilling to have open minds.

a reply to: noonebutme

I cannot criticise religion or theism or the 'metaphysical' because it offends you? Just like how the Muslims in Denmark didn't like cartoons of the prophet, or any criticisms to their faith. You're implying that because I don't believe in it, I'm not allowed to comment, critique or debate? 

Dear member assume what you like I'm
not offended by any of this. I assure you
my skin is far to thick for any of this panzy
ass crap. And the only thing I implied you can't
do is storm off in your stilettos in the middle
of an argument. The only thing I criticize is
your atheist hate. Not real scientific for
boasting so much science.

And you could've said man cave

a reply to: randyvs

Oh come on Randy, again you bleat about 'atheist hate' like a lost lamb on the hillside, go on, quote the alleged specific hate you've seen in this thread, or is it you just want to to be a theistic victim.
That's how I see it.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Must be one of those last word freaks

Until next time gentleman

a reply to: randyvs
So you have nothing then sir?

originally posted by: randyvs
of an argument. The only thing I criticize is your atheist hate.

Please provide an example of this.

originally posted by: turbonium1
Atheism has many forms, and ideologies.

Some are benign, some are diabolical.

Today, I see much more of becoming the latter case.... sadly.

Science has become a platform for promoting such types of atheism.

We are not created, we do not exist in another form. We came from apes. Life was created out of nothing more than slimy heaps of crap, over 5 billion years, give or take a billion, all by random 'chance'.

That's atheism at it's worst.

Wrong. Atheism has only one form and it has ZERO ideologies.

Atheism means ONLY one thing, that someone does not believe that gods are real. That is the only thing it means and nothing else.

You don't seem to know what you're talking about at all, everything you are saying above is either untrue or makes absolutely no sense at all. Also science is not a platform for atheist nor does it have anything to do with it. Science is science.

Atheism ONLY means that someone does not believe gods are real.
It's like how theism ONLY means that someone thinks a god or gods are real.

Atheism is the "no" answer to the question "Are gods real". Theism is the answer "yes" to that question.

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
This is what doesn't add up with atheism.

Atheism is the distantiation of God. These people claim to worship nothing, so are in fact claiming to be souvereign/supreme beings, actually God himself.

I wonder what their doctrine is about.

They very much lack souvereignity if you ask me.

or perhaps this is what you call souvereign:

Lets start at the beginning and say that before light there was a period called Chaos. This according to Wikipedia is an interdisciplinary theory stating that within the apparent randomness of chaotic complex systems, there are underlying patterns, constant feedback loops, repetition, self-similarity, fractals, self-organization, and reliance on programming at the initial point known as sensitive dependence on initial conditions.Whatever religious doctrine you read into I think what ever came before and created Light was F@@king intelligent. Very, but how do you create something from nothing

Mathematics :

= 0 + 0 + 0 + ...
= (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + ...
= 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ...
= 1 + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + ...
= 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ...
= 1

An elegant way of explaining how you can create something from noting.

Now I must admit, Im a man who likes a gamble.From Chaos to Light. Whoever took that bet was seriously one brave son of a bitch. So much could have went wrong. Essentially the transformation from "one point of existance" into another, it's quite scary im told.

But at the end of the day a belief in zero or nothing is actually a belief in something. Proved above

I have unquestionable belief in zero. It's the GOD and infinity bit that I struggle with.

Now here is a video with a subliminal message to atheism

www.youtube.com...



I

a reply to: DpatC

I don't hold any beliefs, I am faithless. How do you deal with people like me?

a reply to: DpatC

I had to star your post. Regardless

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: DpatC

I don't hold any beliefs, I am faithless. How do you deal with people like me?

Randy???

a reply to: randyvs

Eh... I've got suckered a couple of times with incorrectly attributed quotes because... Internet. Happens to the best of us.

a reply to: RenderMan

Wow, really, did it, s what's your point
Or do you think that your statement is relevant in some way because I don't see the point of it.
I don't see the point of your post

Talking history, play along