It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
It's not like the MSM just attacks anything Trump without researching.
New York Times slams AWOL Pompeo, then learns he was rescuing Americans
www.foxnews.com...
βThe absence of Mr. Pompeo and other top State Department officials left perplexed European diplomats privately complaining that they were having trouble getting answers from Washington,β Harris wrote.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: luthier
The press has no right to white house access.
Trump believes that the press is publishing skewed news and hit pieces on him. Many of his supporters do as well. Many who really don't support him do as well. Its not like its a fringe that sees the news as biased and hell bent on taking down the president.
He has a right to take action and disallow what he may believe are seditionists access to the white house.
Sure and he has a right to be called rediculous and a snowflake with thin skin.
I think it's pathetic and shows weak character and I wouldn't watch CNN if you paid me
Shows weak character? To not enable people who have publicly claimed you are their enemy? What kind of bizarro world is this?
Where I come from, being decisive against people who admit their goal is to take you down is what is known as "strong" and "admirable". Those are the folks that people tend to gravitate towards to keep them from being bullied. Its no wonder Trumps popularity is surging. At this point, im likely to be a voter in 2020 (assuming no poisoned water passes underneath the bridge before then).
People's right to call him names is not being discussed. There is no attack on the first amendment. The press has no right to white house access, unless you can show me where this right is granted or guaranteed.
originally posted by: carewemust
Cnn Acosta dangled his credentials to wolf blister and dared Trump to take them away.
The govt can and should bring hell on Earth to cnn corporate.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: amazing
No press should be censured or have credentials taken away. If you are liberal or conservative you should agree with that. We have to have free speech and free press and we have to have some press that disagrees with the status quo. We had that with Obama, with Bush, with Clinton etc. We need it now with Trump and with the next president.
How the Obama administration laid the groundwork for Trumpβs coming crackdown on the press
Yeah but that wasn't a banning conservative news sources from his press conferences.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: hoss53
Honesty, some of you conservatives are so stupid it's beyond logic.
Honestly has an 'l' in it.
Can you provide a quote to that effect?
But he tried to claim fox was not a news organization and did not deserve white house access.
originally posted by: hoss53
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: hoss53
Honesty, some of you conservatives are so stupid it's beyond logic.
Honestly has an 'l' in it.
Seems as if I spell like our dumb as president. cofefe πππππππππππππππππππππππππππ―π―π―πππ―π―π―ππππ π―π―π―π―πππ―π―π―π―π―π―π―π―ππ―π―π―π―ππππππππ
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: dragonridr
Can you provide a quote to that effect?
But he tried to claim fox was not a news organization and did not deserve white house access.