It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I SAY, ALONG WITH MILLIONS
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Plotus
Who says abortion is immoral?
originally posted by: carewemust
May 9, 2018
These covert solicitations to Black women are, at the very least, improper and immoral.
Planned Parenthood Tweet: “If you’re a Black woman in America, it’s statistically safer to have an abortion than to carry a pregnancy to term or give birth.”
You see, Planned Parenthood has unfortunately made themselves the hero in women’s stories, claiming that without their organization, women are powerless to make informed and healthy decisions about their sexuality and pregnancies.
The irony here is that Margaret Sanger’s original goal with Planned Parenthood was to eliminate the “Negro population.” This deeply eugenist view is often swept under the rug by Planned Parenthood supporters today.
Source: freebeacon.com...
More P.P. Soliciting Tweets at: twitter.com...
Why does an organization with the word "Parent" as part of their name, try so hard to keep women (especially Black Women) from being parents? Does Planned Parenthood receive a cash bounty from U.S. Taxpayers for each child they murder?
President Trump needs to also fulfill this campaign promise...His promise to defund Planned Parenthood. Using our money to attract moms, and to kill their unborn children, is just plain WRONG.
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: MRinder
When did I ever say that human women weren't pregnant with human enbryos/fetuses? But, an embryo isn't a person, it's a potential person. A fetus isn't a person, it's a potential person. On the other hand, the woman is a person, and she has the right to decide when to and whether to become a mother.
Usually considered to have been rational, the Founding Fathers explicitly stated that constitutional rights extend to "persons born", not to person unborn. Also, usually considered to a rational body of individuals is the US Supreme Court, that ruled that abortion would be a decision exclusiviely made between a woman and her doctor, until "viability", when the states have an option to regulate the procudure to protect the developing life.
originally posted by: Plotus
I SAY, ALONG WITH MILLIONS
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Plotus
Who says abortion is immoral?
That seems totally irrational to me. Its a form of denial. A potential child (embryo or fetus) is a child, because barring the embryo or the fetus doesn't die naturally or unnaturally it will always result in a child.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Anyway, there should be something like Planned Parenthood that isn't just a liberal front.
Planned Parenthood is liberal, and progressive, by its very nature. PP has always been on the front lines in the "war" for women's reproductive rights. They were there when married women wanted the legal right to use birth control. They were there when unmarried women fought for the right to use birth control. They were there when women were dying in back allies, so desperate they were giving themselves to dirty and dangerous procedures.
They are there now as regressive religious RWNJ try to chip away at women's autonomy and question their ability to make rational decisions for themselves and their families. They are there to fight for rights of living autonomous women over her embryo's/fetus' fetus rights.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: incoserv
This is what Planned Parenthood was built to do.
Seems that racism and eugenics doesn't pay much attention to color. Lot of white folk getting abortions.
Abortion Statistics
BTW, did you know that Nicola Tesla as a eugenicist?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: MRinder
That seems totally irrational to me. Its a form of denial. A potential child (embryo or fetus) is a child, because barring the embryo or the fetus doesn't die naturally or unnaturally it will always result in a child.
Abortion isn't "denial", it's a rejection.
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Bluntone22
their main objective is birth control and family planning so abortions are NOT needed. why do people act like they don't understand that AND what's so damn awful about it??
This is just the voice of reason. And don't give me that crap about liberals being more intelligent. In some cases, they're incidentally on the right side but not always. In some ways they're stupid as all hell and proud of it. Just the same as conservatives. This is too important to be just partisan BS.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Families should not be considered "stuff" or things to be acquired or achieved, I agree with you. A lot of thought and preparations, both financial and emotional stability need to established for a healthy family unit to thrive. Too many people sleep walk through their familial and parental obligations, hoping society will work it out their interpersonal problems for them.
If 80% of the people in the world who are considering kids didn't do it, the human race would survive and there would be more of everything for the people of the future.
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: kaylaluv
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that luv...
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: BrianFlanders
If 80% of the people in the world who are considering kids didn't do it, the human race would survive and there would be more of everything for the people of the future.
So which 20% SHOULD reproduce?