It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ghost
You need to ship 100 tons of food across the country. You have a tractor-trailer that can carry 20 tons at one time, and you have a light box truck that can carry 5 tons at a time. They are equal in reliability. Here's the question: would you rather make 20 trips with the small truck or 5 with the big one?
This shows you my point about why heavy bombers are more efficent then smaller fighters. Even with the most advanced and reliable smart bombs and precision guided missiles: If you have 30 seprate targets, you will need a minimum of 30 bombs to hit all of them! Making weapons more accurate and reliable, will NOT reduse the number of targets that need to be hit. More planes, mean more people(many of whom have families) in harm's way!
MYTH#1: Light strike Aircraft are more accurate then heavy bomber.
FACT: That might have been true in WW2, but with today's smart weapons size no longer affects accuracy.
Myth#2: Fighter are more reliable then heavy bombers.
Fact: Reliability has to do with design, and manafacturing, not how big it is or how complicated.
Myth#3: Fighters are built with better reliabilty.
Fact: All aircraft for the military have to meet the comparable standards for reliability. (Remember: the B-52 is over 50 years old, None of the fighter designs we use today are even close to that age; bombers, like fighters, have improved since then.)
Originally posted by Mr Carburetor
Also our major bombers can travel a much longer distance with enormous payload much more efficiently than a small fighter jet could. Its also about efficiency, shock, and awe!!!
Originally posted by W4rl0rD
If huge bombers are so good,then why build the F-117 earlier? Simple,because, big cargo planes have poor penetration ability. You will not be able to just fly over a S-300 like that,unlike a F-117. B-2s might be able to do that,but they are limited in number in the first place.
Originally posted by ghost
As for the limited number of B-2's built, I'm positive that had to do with Politics, and not strategy. Remember, A politician can put their fingers into anything, even if they are clueless about it! (The Rest of this Argument would better be addressed in another thread!)
Originally posted by ghost
You need to ship 100 tons of food across the country. You have a tractor-trailer that can carry 20 tons at one time, and you have a light box truck that can carry 5 tons at a time. They are equal in reliability. Here's the question: would you rather make 20 trips with the small truck or 5 with the big one?
MYTH#1: Light strike Aircraft are more accurate then heavy bomber.
FACT: That might have been true in WW2, but with today's smart weapons size no longer affects accuracy.
Myth#2: Fighter are more reliable then heavy bombers.
Fact: Reliability has to do with design, and manafacturing, not how big it is or how complicated.
Myth#3: Fighters are built with better reliabilty.
Fact: All aircraft for the military have to meet the comparable standards for reliability. (Remember: the B-52 is over 50 years old, None of the fighter designs we use today are even close to that age; bombers, like fighters, have improved since then.)
Tim
ATS Director of Counter-Ignorance
Originally posted by JamesBlonde
Originally posted by ghost
You need to ship 100 tons of food across the country. You have a tractor-trailer that can carry 20 tons at one time, and you have a light box truck that can carry 5 tons at a time. They are equal in reliability. Here's the question: would you rather make 20 trips with the small truck or 5 with the big one?
This seems like an oversimplification.
It depends what the roads are like. You might not be able to use the big truck all the time. Maybe it is too slow and the food will spoil before it gets there whereas the smaller truck could be faster and refrigerated.
MYTH#1: Light strike Aircraft are more accurate then heavy bomber.
FACT: That might have been true in WW2, but with today's smart weapons size no longer affects accuracy.
Myth#2: Fighter are more reliable then heavy bombers.
Fact: Reliability has to do with design, and manafacturing, not how big it is or how complicated.
Myth#3: Fighters are built with better reliabilty.
Fact: All aircraft for the military have to meet the comparable standards for reliability. (Remember: the B-52 is over 50 years old, None of the fighter designs we use today are even close to that age; bombers, like fighters, have improved since then.)
Myth#1 Well heavy bombers are a more vulnerable target which impacts their usefullness.
Myth#2Agreed. Different aircraft are intended for different roles. Put the rund peg in the round hole
Myth#3 Is actually Myth#2 worded differently.