It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Devin Nunes: AG Jeff Sessions should be held in contempt of Congress

page: 3
28
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04




You can't say I don't need to get a warrant because I am worried about a Judge leaking.


But you can be concerned about turning information about an ongoing investigation over to a body which has been known to leak such information.




posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You had stated you were unaware of the issues with the other cases, a judge being RECUSED, then the new judge asking for ALL the evidence(forged 302s),
so its judges plural with issues with muellers cases.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mach2




The focus, as I see it, is the fact that a congressional oversight committee is being stonewalled.
As I see it the Republicans on the committee are bound and determined to destroy the credibility of the investigation before its report is made.


There is no credibility to the investigation by the Special Counsel. It was illegal to start with, so it's credibility can not be ruined.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT




That's almost never done in the case of a guilty plea unless the judge suspects prosecutorial malfeasance.


But it was Mueller who requested the delay.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You can be concerned, but you still have to do it. Like I said, both sides have leakers, bury them all and charge them with treason. You still have to follow the checks and balances.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:45 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04




You can be concerned, but you still have to do it.
We'll see what happens. Like with that 2 page memo that Nunes struggled so hard for and was so disappointed with.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Even more telling. Meuller is in a hard spot after the Contreras recusal and the info contained in the Strzok/Page texts about Rudy. Not to mention the demand for Discovery.

Read shooterbrody above and the recent actions of Judge Ellis and one other in the last few days: Holes are springing up all over Mueller's witch hunt. I don't think it will sustain much longer as more become emboldened to be on the right side of history.




edit on 6-5-2018 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: OccamsRazor04




You can be concerned, but you still have to do it.
We'll see what happens. Like with that 2 page memo that Nunes struggled so hard for and was so disappointed with.

Well, when someone has requested literally thousands of documents going back nearly a year, and receives 2 pages of non sequitur, he has a right to be disappointed. Don't you think?



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: The GUT




That's almost never done in the case of a guilty plea unless the judge suspects prosecutorial malfeasance.


But it was Mueller who requested the delay.

Yeah Mueller asked for a delay in the case of the Russian company that showed up to plead not guilty to those indictments of the "Russian oligarchs".
That judge also said no way jose.
Amazing Mueller gets all these biased judges....



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Mach2

Nunes asked for an unredacted copy of one particular document. That document was supposed to prove that the FISA warrant was based on the Steele dossier. Apparently it did not do so. Nunes was bummed, even though he apparently didn't even read it.


Nunes told Fox's Laura Ingraham that the document will confirm why the FBI opened its original investigation into the Trump campaign.

thehill.com...
edit on 5/6/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: OccamsRazor04




You can be concerned, but you still have to do it.
We'll see what happens. Like with that 2 page memo that Nunes struggled so hard for and was so disappointed with.
I don't care what is found, what I want to happen is the law followed. If nothing is found great.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

They know this is just a ploy to see what Mueller has. A way to look at his hand and report back to trump.
Rosenstein already told them it's an ongoing investigation and he wasn't going to give them anything from an ongoing investigation.
Contempt of Congress is a misdemeanor no biggy.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

What connection to the case does Mueller have?



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No, he asked for the documents that were provided to the FISA judge to obtain the warrant. Surely there was more than that one memo.

Maybe there wasn't?

In any case if you are argument is that Nunes has been given all he has asked for, you are incorrect. That is the whole point. The congressional oversight committee has the right to anything they want, as it pertains to their investigation.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Sorry, oversight is a real thing. When you fools start wanting to US to operate lawlessly because you want to embarrass someone I don't want to hear you complain when the precedent you set comes back to bite you in the butt because you willingly gave away your Constitutional rights for a laugh.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Mach2

Not in an open investigation. They're just looking for info to report back to trump.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Mach2



In any case if you are argument is that Nunes has been given all he has asked for, you are incorrect.
That is not my argument.


The congressional oversight committee has the right to anything they want, as it pertains to their investigation.
We'll see what happens.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: seeker1963

What connection to the case does Mueller have?


Mueller is dirty as hell! I am not going to spoon feed you. Look up his criminal behavior in Boston, Whitey Bulger and how he forced FBI agents in charge in different cities to either move to DC after 5 years or resign or take a demotion!

Mueller is psychopath!

Also let's not forget Obama pulled all kinds of strings to get the scum bag another 2 years!
edit on 6-5-2018 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Mach2

Not in an open investigation. They're just looking for info to report back to trump.

Can you provide a statute, or case law that supports that statement? I've looked, and I cannot. To have such a statute would mean congress would have had to pass a law that would undercut their own power. That is not likely.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963

Mueller is dirty as hell! I am not going to spoon feed you. Look up his criminal behavior in Boston, Whitey Bulger and how he forced FBI agents in charge in different cities to either move to DC after 5 years or resign or take a demotion!

Mueller is psychopath!


He truly is a sickening individual. It's not even debatable as the documentation is clear and damning.

Mueller’s History of Cover-Ups

Robert Mueller: Unmasked







 
28
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join