It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Need To Impeach (Trump) Campaign

page: 3
28
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Surveyor7
a reply to: intrepid

So the main reason for your dislike of Trump is...

twitter?



Pretty much. It was not "presidential" in the least. Childish actually.




posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:14 AM
link   
a reply to: SATURN66

It's because Obama has never relinquished the throne.




posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SATURN66

It's because Obama has never relinquished the throne.





very true



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:16 AM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

I agree, but unlawful? Impeachable? NEEDS to lead to impeachment to protect the rule of law in America? I think this crime can't be twitter rants, it must be another crime I can't find mention of yet.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:18 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

No, Twitter rants aren't impeachable. It was MY issue.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

The Don is a genius moron, says really stupid crap. Well I guess you can't help me find this heinous crime. Still hope someone here can shed some light on it.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:27 AM
link   
Here is Steve Cohen's accusations in his articles of impeachment.

"Donald J. Trump, in violation of his constitutional oath and obligations, has engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct designed to delay and impede an investigation and to conceal information sought by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the course of its investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 United States presidential election, including any possible collusion between Russia and Donald J. Trump."



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:27 AM
link   
Here is Steve Cohen's accusations in his articles of impeachment.

"Donald J. Trump, in violation of his constitutional oath and obligations, has engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct designed to delay and impede an investigation and to conceal information sought by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the course of its investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 United States presidential election, including any possible collusion between Russia and Donald J. Trump."



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
Here is Steve Cohen's accusations in his articles of impeachment.

"Donald J. Trump, in violation of his constitutional oath and obligations, has engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct designed to delay and impede an investigation and to conceal information sought by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the course of its investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 United States presidential election, including any possible collusion between Russia and Donald J. Trump."


Collusion isn't a crime.

So Trump impeded an investigation into a non-crime which they determined to be criminal.




posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

An accusation is not being found guilty of a crime.

Can I accuse you of being a bad hombre and then demand the death penalty?



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr


I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.



The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.


Obstruction would be a high crime or misdemeanor. But there was only an accusation of collusion, which is not a crime as it would be consultation not bribery nor treason as there was no compensation that resulted in loss of property or lives or even secrets. There might be evidence of an exchange of information for relaxing sanctions. But considering the sanctions were placed on accusations of collusion and annexing land from a neighboring country in the first place....seems a little cart before the horse type of argument.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 10:17 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Is this the same group that collected a cool 50 mil to thwart Trump?

I wonder the full amount of money that has went towards that effort, and how somebody's conscious allows that amount of expenditure while "fighting" for the little guy.

We could use this money to actually help the people we supposedly speak for, or we could use it to continually propagandize hate. Hate it is.

It's obviously worked for some, but people can only be kept in such a emotionally enhanced position for soo long, I've seen waning lately.


What crime you say? Being too bold in the face of adversary of course. That's not impeachable?

Questioning our Intel community? If people would just dismiss their actions and question the questioners that would be great, you know National Security is at stake and all.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: TheLead

No, it's a Cali billionaire who went after Trump and Trump fired back at him so now he is trying to impeach him.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 10:27 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Well that ought the be a good enough reason for impeachment, how dare Trump respond. You know all California billionaires have such a high moral proclivity they should not be questioned.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 10:27 AM
link   

edit on 5/6/2018 by TheLead because: Dubious double post



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Who are you talking about? Maybe you want to include some background details?



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Deetermined

He's been running ads here in Virginia for a year now. He has a website.

www.needtoimpeach.com...

There's a petition you can sign.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 11:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Oh no...because he needs summer help at his resort he's okay with letting in seasonal workers but when they're done they need to leave. Win win right?



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

No, I really don't. The point is not to give him publicity, but to discover what this crime was. I will provide quotes offhis ads though, and a twitter comment. I saw his ad on TV.


He’s brought us to the brink of nuclear war, obstructed justice at the FBI, and in direct violation of the Constitution, he’s taken money from foreign governments and threatened to shut down news organizations that report the truth. If that isn’t the case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become?

A Republican Congress once impeached a president for far less, yet today people in Congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who is mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons, and they do nothing.

'Keep America Great' is a dark, twisted joke on the American public as he slowly dismantles our democracy, global standing, & rule of law


Maybe you can help me, what has Trump proven to have done that warrants impeachment? This guy keeps talking about nukes, who did trump nuke again? Or is NK saying it will end it's nuke program bad, maybe I am confused.



posted on May, 6 2018 @ 11:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid

Pretty much. It was not "presidential" in the least. Childish actually.


I wonder what does that mean every time I see someone say "he is not presidential" ? Do we need a career politician that says all the right things but does little so as not to reduce their chances of a life long post or in the case of the President 8 years?

Are we ignorant to not think that ALL presidents talked the same crap, except the others did it in private to protect their professional politician careers?

When I see that statement I read mostly, "we lost, so he is not my President!"




edit on 6-5-2018 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)







 
28
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join