It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: UKTruth
I wouldn't be so sure of that he could easily return the case to Virginia and its prosecutor. Mueller took this from them saying he had jurisdiction to do so. If the judge decides he does not and returns it to them huge win for Mueller. Because the likely outcome will become paying a fine as opposed to going to jail.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Xcathdra
Thanks for the info and link.
If Manafort broke the law he should be held responsible, but Mueller doesn't get to break the law in order to hold him responsible.
Funny how there is trouble in all these cases except for the "lying to the fbi" portions(Flynns case will blow that open).
originally posted by: xxspockyxx
I recently read that a lot of Muellers scope was given to him verbally by Rosenstien so I wonder how that will hold up in court?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Xcathdra
I think its crazy these are CAREER law enforcement people.
Our law enforcement agencies have been fubar for decades.
These are the situations the founders warned us about.
originally posted by: Willtell
A 78-year-old Reagan appointed judge. He obviously is letting his politics get in the way of doing his job
Irrelevant.
You have no more credibility with me.
Justice is not subjective.
I think I figured it out.
originally posted by: RickinVa
This thread should have come with a trigger warning.
The fact that a judge would question the Special Council was bound to trigger someone.
Read back through the thread and see if you can figure out who got triggered. Happy hunting!
NO, Muellers indictment of Manafort is looking highly suspect and you are in fact wrong.
originally posted by: Willtell
No, Mueller’s indictment of Manafort is well within the legal responsibilities of the special prosecutor.
Only a die-hard political judge would say otherwise.
Clintons SP was chosen to investigate Whitewater but they ended up going after Clinton for lying about sex
Clintons SP was chosen to investigate Whitewater but they ended up going after Clinton for lying about sex
originally posted by: carewemust
Judge T.S. Ellis is now in possession of the ultra top-secret "scope of authority" memo that AAG Rosenstein wrote to Bob Mueller in August of last year.
Story: www.foxnews.com...
Now we'll see if judge Ellis feels that putting Manafort on trial for his pre-2016 activities is lawful, or was it just another chapter in Bob Mueller's overall witch hunt.
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: carewemust
Judge T.S. Ellis is now in possession of the ultra top-secret "scope of authority" memo that AAG Rosenstein wrote to Bob Mueller in August of last year.
Story: www.foxnews.com...
Now we'll see if judge Ellis feels that putting Manafort on trial for his pre-2016 activities is lawful, or was it just another chapter in Bob Mueller's overall witch hunt.
Case dismissed.......