It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Is six week not enough time to decide upon killing human life?
Some women don't even know if they are pregnant that far out. Plus the hoops that Republicans put women through just to get an abortion could also delay the process if she found out around 3 or 4 weeks. And this doesn't even take into account that decisions like this take time to figure out. Women should be able to take their time to figure out if they want the abortion or not.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Is six week not enough time to decide upon killing human life?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Is six week not enough time to decide upon killing human life?
Some women don't even know if they are pregnant that far out. Plus the hoops that Republicans put women through just to get an abortion could also delay the process if she found out around 3 or 4 weeks. And this doesn't even take into account that decisions like this take time to figure out. Women should be able to take their time to figure out if they want the abortion or not.
That’s a good point. Besides, They’re probably going to kill it anyways.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Is six week not enough time to decide upon killing human life?
I didn't know I was pregnant until I missed my second period. That's about 8 weeks. My step daughter didn't realize she was pregnant until about 12 weeks, because she was still having periods, albeit very light ones. In both our cases, we were using birth control, so pregnancy wasn't in our minds when our periods were not "normal".
Neither of us got an abortion, but that's beside the point. The point is, it is not uncommon at all to be outside a 6 week window before you know you're pregnant. These lawmakers are quite aware of that, so it's obvious this is a sneaky attempt to outlaw abortion. It won't stand, because it clearly goes against R v W.
originally posted by: intrepid
Good luck. This won't survive a SCOTUS challenge. And you KNOW there's going to be one.
originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Oh please . Ban guns for the kids safety but kill the kids before they have a chance..
just because you believe it having a heartbeat means nothing doesn't mean other people think that way..
They have to be idiots and sick to not see it your way and kill something with a heartbeat..
Go ahead and keep championing the killing of fetuses with heartbeats. It makes you look like a nice person.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Oh please . Ban guns for the kids safety but kill the kids before they have a chance..
They have to be idiots and sick to not see it your way and kill something with a heartbeat..
I guess those guns aren't for hunting then.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
That’s a good point. Besides, They’re probably going to kill it anyways.
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Oh please . Ban guns for the kids safety but kill the kids before they have a chance..
They have to be idiots and sick to not see it your way and kill something with a heartbeat..
I guess those guns aren't for hunting then.
Maybe they should suck the fetus out then shoot it with an AR_15 . Just to be sure..
Hey now, don't be giving them ideas now...
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Oh please . Ban guns for the kids safety but kill the kids before they have a chance..
They have to be idiots and sick to not see it your way and kill something with a heartbeat..
I guess those guns aren't for hunting then.
Maybe they should suck the fetus out then shoot it with an AR_15 . Just to be sure..
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
That’s a good point. Besides, They’re probably going to kill it anyways.
Can't you just admit you were wrong without including snipes like that?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Is six week not enough time to decide upon killing human life?
I didn't know I was pregnant until I missed my second period. That's about 8 weeks. My step daughter didn't realize she was pregnant until about 12 weeks, because she was still having periods, albeit very light ones. In both our cases, we were using birth control, so pregnancy wasn't in our minds when our periods were not "normal".
Neither of us got an abortion, but that's beside the point. The point is, it is not uncommon at all to be outside a 6 week window before you know you're pregnant. These lawmakers are quite aware of that, so it's obvious this is a sneaky attempt to outlaw abortion. It won't stand, because it clearly goes against R v W.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Bluntone22
Anti-abortions bills should be unconstitutional. Abortion has been ruled legal in the US, but Republicans keep pushing back on that. It's sickening.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Is six week not enough time to decide upon killing human life?
I didn't know I was pregnant until I missed my second period. That's about 8 weeks. My step daughter didn't realize she was pregnant until about 12 weeks, because she was still having periods, albeit very light ones. In both our cases, we were using birth control, so pregnancy wasn't in our minds when our periods were not "normal".
Neither of us got an abortion, but that's beside the point. The point is, it is not uncommon at all to be outside a 6 week window before you know you're pregnant. These lawmakers are quite aware of that, so it's obvious this is a sneaky attempt to outlaw abortion. It won't stand, because it clearly goes against R v W.
If the law passes then pleading ignorance isn't going to work.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Is six week not enough time to decide upon killing human life?
I didn't know I was pregnant until I missed my second period. That's about 8 weeks. My step daughter didn't realize she was pregnant until about 12 weeks, because she was still having periods, albeit very light ones. In both our cases, we were using birth control, so pregnancy wasn't in our minds when our periods were not "normal".
Neither of us got an abortion, but that's beside the point. The point is, it is not uncommon at all to be outside a 6 week window before you know you're pregnant. These lawmakers are quite aware of that, so it's obvious this is a sneaky attempt to outlaw abortion. It won't stand, because it clearly goes against R v W.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Bluntone22
Anti-abortions bills should be unconstitutional. Abortion has been ruled legal in the US, but Republicans keep pushing back on that. It's sickening.
At one time, slavery was legal in the U.S. too.