It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
According to MSNBC the wiretap was initiated by the Fed's in NY not Robert Mueller. The tap may have been in place for weeks before the raid and also confirms that this was a current crime.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: intrepid
Yes I'm sure it was all underhanded and done by breaking every law applicable to surveillance and was paid for by money that Hillary got by selling baby kitten skins to the Berman brothers. In Russia...
Apparently Hillary is the best scapegoat people can think of. Never mind that we should be held responsible for our own actions and Trump and friends are the ones that have put themselves in this position.
It's become reasonable to blame others....because Hillary.
originally posted by: Tempter
I just have one question:
Can Republicans do all of these horrible, criminal things to Democrats next cycle?
originally posted by: introvert
It appears Muller and his team had nothing to do with this, accept a referral to the NY authorities, which they are legally and ethically bound to do.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DexterRiley
That's why when Mueller discovered this activity he handed it off. It was out of his scope. That's him sticking to the boundaries laid out for him. What's the problem?
Should they have just ignored a possible crime in progress? If so Why?1
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
This is the most bat # crazy script I've ever seen. I wonder how they've written the ending? I'm sure they've got years of material they're waiting to release to us. I wonder how long it took them to write it?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DexterRiley
That's why when Mueller discovered this activity he handed it off. It was out of his scope. That's him sticking to the boundaries laid out for him. What's the problem?
Should they have just ignored a possible crime in progress? If so Why?1
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: introvert
It appears Muller and his team had nothing to do with this, accept a referral to the NY authorities, which they are legally and ethically bound to do.
I don't think this wiretapping is new news...the Feds used NY authorities because it was out of the jurisdiction of the feds and the state could legally do it working hand in hand.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Tempter
If it ultimately brings down both major parties and purges our political system of corruption then I say go for it.
originally posted by: DexterRiley
However, I have to ask: What does the Donald Trump, Stormy Daniels, and Michael Cohen situation have to do with Russian election meddling and Trump campaign collusion? That's where the Mueller investigation started.