It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Oh you guys are gonna have a field day. Cohen was wiretapped!

page: 10
24
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 3 2018 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

That he was ridiculed for using a phrase that doesnt literally apply to new tech, now everyone is using it as default, as Trump did.

My point is people find anything end everything to make fun of him, you know the usual hypocritical stuff.

Thats all.




posted on May, 3 2018 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

My iPad can’t understand my [hick] accent...
Apple ought’na put a Texas algorithm in...but I do declare, it purt near shorted out my brain when silly criticized you...I plum got the vapors...

Sillyofme is the Hillary of ATS....no offense to Antediluvian who is the all time g.o.a.t of the socialist hoardes of ATS....hes the michael Jordan of their ranks..though he probably doesn’t know who Michael Jordan is...

-Chris



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 03:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Have you finished your popcorn? I'm all out.




posted on May, 3 2018 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

I have no more proof than the rest of the speculation on here. It seems to fit the timeline of events.
The refferal came from Mueller. So the Southern district of New York didn't have enough evidence for the raid without Mueller's refferal. Which lends the question that if the Southern district of New York had Cohen under surveillance wire tapped his phone and read all his emails how come they didn't have enough evidence. Why would they need a refferal to raid Cohen's offices.

The only way this makes sense is if Mueller had Cohen under surveillance under the guise of Russian collusion. Found evidence not pertaining to the russia probe. Then handed that evidence over in a refferal to the Southern district of New York. Who then raided Cohen's offices in thier "unrelated" investigation. All the Southern district of New York fbi has to say now is during the course of our investigation into Cohen we found evidence of wrong doing in another ongoing case. We have turned that evidence over to the proper people. This just seems like a way for Mueller to get around attorney client privilege.

The media themselves referred to the Southern district of New York as a taint team to sift through all the evidence so they wouldn't break privilege on the Mueller probe.
edit on 3-5-2018 by Meniscus because: Added the last part



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 03:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Meniscus
a reply to: introvert

I have no more proof than the rest of the speculation on here. It seems to fit the timeline of events.
The refferal came from Mueller. So the Southern district of New York didn't have enough evidence for the raid without Mueller's refferal. Which lends the question that if the Southern district of New York had Cohen under surveillance wire tapped his phone and read all his emails how come they didn't have enough evidence. Why would they need a refferal to raid Cohen's offices.

The only way this makes sense is if Mueller had Cohen under surveillance under the guise of Russian collusion. Found evidence not pertaining to the russia probe. Then handed that evidence over in a refferal to the Southern district of New York. Who then raided Cohen's offices in thier "unrelated" investigation. All the Southern district of New York fbi has to say now is during the course of our investigation into Cohen we found evidence of wrong doing in another ongoing case. We have turned that evidence over to the proper people.

The media themselves referred to the Southern district of New York as a taint team to sift through all the evidence so they wouldn't break privilege on the Mueller probe.


There isn't only one way, it could have come from witness testimony. Or subpoenaed records.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Meniscus



I have no more proof than the rest of the speculation on here.


I figured that would be the case.



It seems to fit the timeline of events.


Not really, unless there is evidence to suggest such a thing.

Talking out of your ass is not evidence.

As for the rest of your post, it appears you may be confused as to what the timeline actually is.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:00 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

If there was a subpoena it would have been reported in the media.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:01 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

The fact of the matter is no one knows who or when the surveillance on Cohen was initiated.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Meniscus
a reply to: introvert

The fact of the matter is no one knows who or when the surveillance on Cohen was initiated.


So then all this "speculation" is nothing more than smoke up our asses.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:04 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

Niether witness testimony or subpoenaed records are what is being discussed in the media today. So to go with what we have is all we can do.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

See ya.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

See ya.


Are you going somewhere?



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: PurpleFox

Yeah well you're going to have to prove that because I just looked for it and I don't see anything that suggests that.
So please. Or point me in the right direction. Thanks.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Meniscus
a reply to: luthier

Niether witness testimony or subpoenaed records are what is being discussed in the media today. So to go with what we have is all we can do.


Yesh why use common sense or probability.

It's better to just follow the talking points and regurgitate them in your little babies mouths.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Don't go!!!!!



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Meniscus

If there was a subpoena it would not be in the media what was found in the records subpoenaed.

A record for something else say gates could have led to another investigative stream.

It's obvious people just follow the media talking points. The same ones that are criticized as bs.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

My grammar. P!ease point out my error teacher.
My parents were very proud of my school grades. They had a piano covered with pictures and awards. I thought it was a bit much myself.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:14 PM
link   
a reply to: proximo

There was no wiretap of trump or trump tower. And trumps tweets , when he gets his spelling correct are banal and empty cheers for his base and nothing more.
He had a Kaiser roll, dinner roll, hamburger roll to play you know. Lol



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:15 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

The only revelation that started this thread is that Cohen was surveiled. We don't know why or when or who initiated the surveillance. But it doesn't look to me that it was the Southern district of New York. Or they wouldn't need a refferal to raid Cohen's offices.

To call me for bringing a different viewpoint to todays new info is weak.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 04:16 PM
link   
so now no wiretap???
this is truely bizzare



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join