It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How far should the US go for Israel??

page: 4
4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 4 2018 @ 03:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: makemap

And only a fraction of the Arab populations..

If it had really been all the Arabs they could have fielded an army of 50 million.. just guessing the fighting age male population.



Arabs at that time were technological backwards and needed support from Soviets. The reason for that is because they didn't really entered WW2 like WW1 from Ottoman Empire. They lacked skill in the mechanized and air division. Even with that 50 million Arab, they won't get through because US and Britain was the one supplying and supporting Israel technologically. Soviet didn't really care all that much about the Arabs either. No one like the Arabs that time. That would be their mistake if Arabians all ganged up on Israel. We all know US/UK troops were under disguise as Israel when it formed.

On the other hand Soviet Union was smart enough to supported China or else WW3 would've started against Soviet Union right after WW2. US still had their War Plans to even invade Canada.

edit on 4-5-2018 by makemap because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 8 2018 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox
World War 3 has been raging since 2009. It does not look like it based solely on news articles, but when you view the actual war footage and the volume of players involved in the actual conflict, you will realize, yes, it has been going on since the conflict in Georgia in 2009 when Russia used force to counter NATO encroachment.

We have already killed many Russians in Syria, and some of the Americans who have perished in Syria as "volunteers for the SDF" or embedded advisors have Russian logistics and intel to thank for it.

You do not recognize it as such because unlike in World War 2, there are billions of hours of entertainment and mind numbing signals to pacify the brain from thinking about it not to mention the government propaganda wing known as the Global Engagement center which is now run by the CIA (Secretary of State).

Open genocide in the Middle East, chemical weapons, a possible mini-nuke in Yemen, all three global military empires with boots on the ground inside Syria, plus a handful of regional military empires present fighting there, in Yemen, in Iraq, threats of nuclear attacks, nearly 100 nations involved in a related global conflict that stretches from Libya through the Red Sea and Persian Gulf and has found its way all the way to the pacific in the Philippines and soon to be more.

Im sorry if you want to deny it or try to make excuses for why it is not true, but we have been living through and watching world war 3 for nearly a decade, more if you measure from 9/11 when we went on a global rampage like others measure by. But as was the case in Germany, it was not considered a global war until somebody fought back. That is why I measure from 2009 when the Russians Struck Back.

And just as an FYI, nearly every citizen in North America was able to continue living care free during the entirety of WW2 with perhaps only rations of certain supplies as the only negative consequence.

Instead of the mass destruction and fighting in Europe though this time it was done in the Middle East. Today, right now, Yemen, Syria, and much of Iraq as well as Libya look very much like 1940's France, Britain, Germany, Italy, Egypt etc..

Here, allow me to show you an example of what WW3 looks like.




new topics
 
4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join