It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump brings on Clinton impeachment lawyer.

page: 4
15
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 2 2018 @ 05:32 PM
link   
likra reply to: hoss53
He won't resign, even though he should
(i'm not worthy !)

but he'll cling on, like a turd to a cats arse
till the very end


He's so dumb, that imminent impeachment will not stop him
His tiny thumbs'll carry on Tweeting even as helico' 1 sweeps him and familly into infamy

and into the dustbin of history

Trump, the abberation of american history
Trump, the dirty stain, best forgotten and not talked about
Trump, he national shame
How's that for a legacy ?




posted on May, 2 2018 @ 05:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Cassi3l

I have a question for you and the other ardent never trump people posting here just to take a jab sans any real contribution to the thread...who did you or would you have voted for and why do you think they were a better choice?



posted on May, 2 2018 @ 06:15 PM
link   
given that the bombing of Syria through russian no fly zones
"would spark off ww3", the Clinton option was a sure fire no-no
(the consequenses would be tooooo dire to contemplate)

Trump has, not-withstanding,
done the same thing

To what consequence ?

Same result !
Zero result
no ww3

Clinton or Trump
Same need to show strength and resolve
same result, irrespecitve of party affiliation
a reply to: RickyD



posted on May, 2 2018 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Cassi3l

I to agree we should have not been there, and ought to seek a way to remove our assets from the area. I am sure there are other places we can put a pipe that even if more out of the way still less costly if you factor the money spent waging war for access.

However, that leaves the question...who would you have voted for that ran?



posted on May, 2 2018 @ 07:10 PM
link   
a reply to: RickyD


..who would you have voted for that ran?


with gritted, worn away, teeth ?
For 4 years only ?
Clinton

Trump was an evident non starter
He's an idiot, a chancer and a bankrupting shyster
his 'previous' is an attestation

an attestation to to his 'unfit-fullness' for the job
edit on 2-5-2018 by Cassi3l because: tidying up



posted on May, 2 2018 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: soundguy

sounds like a snowflake, must be a fraking snowflake,you piece of dog extrament. he won get over it.



posted on May, 2 2018 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Scrubdog

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: soundguy

This is great news! Maybe he can prevent Trump from being impeached, like he did for President Clinton!


Clinton was impeached, by the House, run by Republicans. He wasn't convicted in the Senate, where it takes 66 votes to convict.

Which takes only one part of Congress. And the Senate was near 50-50. Not to mention it takes 67 votes in either
So , your point is ? Other than you can conveniently leave out facts.....
Clinton was impeached due to lying under oath. Perjury.
So that means old dude knows his stuff. Took a good lawyer to prevent obstruction of justice charges against Bill.

edit on 5/2/18 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 12:13 AM
link   
a reply to: Cassi3l

Well economy wise I don't think he is doing very bad. His foreign policy needs work...Korea was nice though. He is a bit manipulatable by the military brass it seems though.

I would wager he is no idiot either as the guy has managed not to lose a fortune over a lifetime as well as win the presidency.

As far as unfit...with as much as we are finding out about Hilary and the corruption surrounding her on almost all fronts as well as her decietfulness how is it she would be more fit in the office? That's what I can't get past. I can understand some of the more rational criticisms of trump...not all the name calling and sensationalism, but the legitimate issues with his policies, of which there are more than a couple I don't like myself. To think Hilary fit for anything but selling us out for her gain though, after she has shown she is more than willing to do so, to me, is unforgivable.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 05:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Cassi3l
a reply to: RickyD


..who would you have voted for that ran?


with gritted, worn away, teeth ?
For 4 years only ?
Clinton

Trump was an evident non starter
He's an idiot, a chancer and a bankrupting shyster
his 'previous' is an attestation

an attestation to to his 'unfit-fullness' for the job


that's your opinion, and it's noted. Sadly for you, more people thought differently and elected Trump. And much like when Obama was elected twice, those of us who didn't like him had to deal with it. So my advice to you is.....deal with it.



posted on May, 3 2018 @ 09:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Cassi3l
a reply to: manuelram16
mouahahaha
and Stormy to take notes
She has exceptionel ...digital ... skills :p


Wow! now you're talking, Double wammy!!!




top topics



 
15
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join