posted on Mar, 4 2005 @ 03:19 PM
I think the only one acting like a kid here, is yourself, whose calling everyone names. I am also surprised you have not been warned by any
moderators. I was warned once for simply insinuating what someone said was stupidity, and here you can blantantly call people idiots and others names,
and get away with it? Anyhow, I am not going to stoop to your level, just to demonstrate to you who the real adults are.
You did not actually answer my point about why the UN is powerless, instead you just started making insults, something you would expect from a child.
I certainly would not expect a child to be able to discuss sensibly or intelligently when challenged intellectually, they would instead bad mouth you
or throw mud at you, which indeed you have(I am sure if you could, you would throw mud too) so it is indeed interesting that you psychologically
project your immaturity and lack of sense onto others. Just that you know I've already graduated from school and college.
Here at ATS we have certain rules and regulations about how you conduct yourself. If you have not done so already, please read the terms and
conditions. As a responsible member, I am letting you know, just so in the future you will know the rules, and thus any violations thereafter were
The UN history you provided is not complete, and I am not surprised, as your source probably has the incomplete history. Now, please allow this humble
adult to give you the complete history from it's inception to it's prehistory:
The UN is the result of an organization proposed by Woodrow wilson, though created by Edward Mandell House, called the league of nations to be formed
for a global government with America as a member. However, the senator refused to ratify the treaty, as obviously it was no different than asking
America to become a colony of the empire again. However, the efforts did not end here. The original proponents of this were Paul Warburg, J. P.
Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, John W. Davis, an elite circle of friends who were involved in the forming of the federal reserves. The next year, House
arranged an assembly of dignitaries and went to Europe for post-war peace talks, leading to the formation of the INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS,
which has two branches; one in London under the name of Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA); and the other in New York, which was called
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), formed officially July 29, 1921. The purpose was to invite the most wealthiest members in the society that
could influence US foreign policy and form a world government. In 1941, two weeks after Pearl harbour attacks by Japan, Cordell Hull, secretary of the
state, recommended a presidential post-war advisory committee for the planning of the UN. This committee consisted of 14, out of which 10 were CFR
members. In 1945, UNESCO(United Nations, Educational Scientific and Culture Organization) was formed to prepare for the people for world government or
NWO. A point to be taken note of: both UN and UNESCO was formed at a time of war and instability.
So as the UN was formed by an organization whose interests were US foreign policy, UN therefore became nothing but a medium through which US foreign
policy was conducted. Henceforth, why the UN is ultimately powerless, as it is nothing more than another arm of US foreign policy, henceforth why UN
works alongside US in all issues and affairs and henceforth why US has the power to overrule it. Which it has been done in the Iraq war.
I am sorry to burst your bubble of the pie-in-the-sky hopes you had for the UN, but in the real adult world, it is not true. Russia and China do not
require the UN to conduct their foreign policy. They are sovereign states and have vested interests in Iran and the middle east, and a US
transgression against those interests, is a hostile act towards them. Thus, why I am telling you, but I do not expect your feeble mind to understand,
that the framework for WWIII is already laid down and an allied attack on Iran will set WWIII into motion. And even you should not be naive enough to
think that if US goes to war with Russia and China, that your entire land is not at risk of nukes raining down on you.
If you are sensible, which seems not to be the case, you would recognize that if and when this does happen, it was not worth it. You see, there are
two choices, you either go to war with Iran, who has done nothing to you, nor is capable of it, or don't go to war and save your economy and the
thousands of US soliders that will die needlessly in war for no reason at all, other than twirps at home cheering them on.
I got some advice for you, go and watch a game of baseball and something, war is not a game.
[edit on 4-3-2005 by Indigo_Child]