It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: rickymouse
Unless the moon is what governs the earth instead of the other way around.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: rickymouse
Unless the moon is what governs the earth instead of the other way around.
The moon moves in a straight line, the magnetic field of the earth alters that straight line and makes it circle the earth...but the moon is still traveling in a straight line. Same with the planets around the sun from what I read.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: DpatC
I to have thought of this from time to time.
Our rotation around the sun for all intents and purposes is a perpetual motion machine.
If only we could harness that energy somehow.
It is my belief that this is at the heart of the technology that nikola tesla was working with.
originally posted by: fakedirt
a reply to: scraedtosleep
I am sure that tesla considered maxwells hyperdimensional torsion theory prior to conducting tests in that area.
apologies if I am mistaken.
f
originally posted by: hombero
a reply to: rickymouse
I think you mean gravity...
There is no energy generated by the rotation of our solar system, so the answer would be zero. The planets have kinetic energy which is what is keeping them in orbit. You could try to extract some of that kinetic energy, but if you do that enough the orbits would decay because then they would no longer have enough kinetic energy to maintain their orbits.
originally posted by: DpatC
I have A bit of a strange question but would anyone have an idea as to the total ammount of kenetic energy generated by the rotation of our solar system.
The sun does generate a tremendous amount of energy through nuclear fusion, which is emitted as electromagnetic radiation. But the rotation calculation is easy, the answer is zero energy generated.
I am only trying to world out the engergy generated by our sun and planets not its rotation around the milky way.
Any help or pointers in the right direction as to how I should apprach this calculation would be greatly appreciated
But it's not a perfect energy source. We can extract small amounts of energy without slowing the earth's rotation much, but the more energy we extract, the more the rotation slows down and this means days would no longer be 24 hours long. If it was really a perfect energy source it wouldn't make days longer.
originally posted by: StallionDuck
a reply to: DpatC
Googled: kenetic energy generated by the rotation of our solar system
Found:
Rotational energy - Wikipedia
Earth's Spinning Kinetic Eenrgy - A Perfect Energy Source
originally posted by: rickymouse
Why doesn't the moon just stop orbiting when the magnetic field flips? Seems to me since the moon actually travels in a straight line it should leave when the magnetic field reverses.
originally posted by: stormcell
originally posted by: rickymouse
Why doesn't the moon just stop orbiting when the magnetic field flips? Seems to me since the moon actually travels in a straight line it should leave when the magnetic field reverses.
The strength of a magnetic field follows an inverse cubed equation. Gravity follows an inverse squared equation. Fortunately, the Moon isn't a giant ball bearing so magnetic fields don't affect it - it's own magnetic field has long since died.