It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bicent
a reply to: ArMaP
They offered help. But my understanding is the British government did not allow them to help, can you help justify and help me understand that logic?
Let me ask a question, say god forbid we get an illness that is not curable a terminal illness and doctors say they can’t save us in the country we live in, but say a foreign country has a trial procedure they can try on you that has a chance to save you
originally posted by: Bicent
They offered help.
But my understanding is the British government did not allow them to help, can you help justify and help me understand that logic?
originally posted by: Bicent
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Bull crap the courts are the government. They enforce the laws of the land... Am I missing something?
originally posted by: Bicent
Exactly why didn’t the hospital let the parents take the child somewhere else that would allow them to keep the child on life support RIGHT OR WRONG.
originally posted by: Bicent
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I think this is where I am right. The debate ends here courts enforce governmental law henceforth the government.. it was sad but arguing over semantics, is arguably cumbersome. Would not be surprised if you guys are part of the authority.
originally posted by: Bicent
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I think this is where I am right. The debate ends here courts enforce governmental law henceforth the government.. it was sad but arguing over semantics, is arguably cumbersome. Would not be surprised if you guys are part of the authority.