It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
F A C T !
originally posted by: Bicent
Let me ask a question, say god forbid we get an illness that is not curable a terminal illness and doctors say they can’t save us in the country we live in, but say a foreign country has a trial procedure they can try on you that has a chance to save you, and you want to go, but your government says you can’t and you end up having to go thru the judicial branch of your government to try and get permission to go and in the end some guy you don’t even know mighta had a fight with his wife before he hears your case with his wife deciding your fate and he says no, and decides to end your treatment and you die a week later because he feels that is the best choice for you..
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Bicent
Nobody killed the child that implies murder, this child died of a disease.
When you use Language like killed it’s difficult to answer
No the child died because they stopped feeding him and removed his breathing tube and refused any additional treatment..... Even from another country
Fact
Wrong he was not starved to death.
Get a better argument
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Wrong he was not starved to death.
Get a better argument
originally posted by: Bicent
Again, why did a court intervene with what parents of a sick child want to do?
There is no conspiracy, the wee guys dead because bureaucratic retards stood in the way of the parent's wishes and perhaps Italian doctors could do what ours could not!
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
No the child died because they stopped feeding him and removed his breathing tube and refused any additional treatment..... Even from another country
Fact